Grasping component alterations and limb transport

The kinematic changes associated with the manipulation and transport components during a prehensile movement were examined using an experimental paradigm that required alterations in only the manipulation component. Instead of starting with the thumb and index finger naturally together (control condition), subjects began the reach-to-grasp movement with their thumb and fingers fully extended (experimental condition). In contrast to the control condition, in the experimental conditions the thumb and index finger started to close during wrist transport, then opened again prior to object grasp. In addition, there was a brief inflection in the ascending portion of the velocity profile of the wrist in over half the trials. However, all the primary features of the transport component profile remained unaltered. The results suggest that there can be substantial reorganization of the grip aperture during the first part of the reach without altering the temporal and spatial relationships between grip aperture and transport as the object to be grasped is approached.

[1]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  The coupling of arm and finger movements during prehension , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  H. Kuypers,et al.  Intrahemispheric cortical connexions and visual guidance of hand and finger movements in the rhusus monkey. , 1975, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  T. Milner,et al.  A model for the generation of movements requiring endpoint precision , 1992, Neuroscience.

[4]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Does the type of prehension influence the kinematics of reaching , 1992, Behavioural Brain Research.

[5]  Christine L. MacKenzie,et al.  Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task , 1990 .

[6]  C. MacKenzie,et al.  The speed-accuracy trade-off in manual prehension: effects of movement amplitude, object size and object width on kinematic characteristics , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  J. A. Scott Kelso,et al.  Temporal constraints in reaching and grasping behavior , 1990 .

[8]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  S. Chieffi,et al.  Coordination between the transport and the grasp components during prehension movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements , 1991, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  U. Castiello,et al.  Reach to grasp: the natural response to perturbation of object size , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  Accepted April,et al.  Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension , 1991 .

[13]  Donald G. Stein,et al.  Effects of posterior parietal lesions on visually guided behavior in monkeys , 1978, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  M. Jeannerod The timing of natural prehension movements. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[15]  M. A. Arbib,et al.  Models of Trajectory Formation and Temporal Interaction of Reach and Grasp. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[16]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  Parietal cortex neurons of the monkey related to the visual guidance of hand movement , 1990, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  M. Gentilucci,et al.  Temporal coupling between transport and grasp components during prehension movements: effects of visual perturbation , 1992, Behavioural Brain Research.

[18]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Orienting the finger opposition space during prehension movements. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.

[19]  Alan M. Wing,et al.  Remote responses to perturbation in human prehension , 1991, Neuroscience Letters.

[20]  M. Jeannerod Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects , 1981 .

[21]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Grip reorganization during wrist transport: the influence of an Altered aperture , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.