Assessment of Flex-Grid/MCF Optical Networks with ROADM limited core switching capability

The majority of the research studies on Flex-Grid over multi-core fiber (Flex-Grid/MCF) networks are built on the assumption of fully non-blocking ROADMs (FNB-ROADMs), able to switch any portion of the spectrum from any input core of any input fiber to any output core of any output fiber. Such flexibility comes at an enormous extra hardware cost. In this paper, we explore the trade-off of using ROADMs that impose the so-called core continuity constraint (CCC). Namely, a CCC-ROADM can switch spectrum from a core on an input fiber to a chosen output fiber, but cannot choose the specific output core. For instance, if all fibers have the same number of cores, the i-th core in the input fibers can be just switched to the i-th core in the output fibers. To evaluate the performance vs. cost trade-off of using CCC-ROADMs, we present two Integer Linear Programming (ILP) formulations for optimally allocating incoming demands in Flex-Grid/MCF networks, where the CCC constraint is imposed or not, respectively. A set of results are extracted applying both schemes in two different backbone networks. Transmission reach estimations are conducted accounting for the fiber's linear and non-linear effects, as well as the inter-core crosstalk (ICXT) impairment introduced by laboratory MCF prototypes of 7, 12 and 19 cores. Our numerical evaluations show that the performance penalty of CCC is minimal, i.e., below 1% for 7 and 12-core MCF and up to 10% for 19-core MCF, while the cost reduction is large. In addition, results reveal that the ICXT effect can be significant when the number of cores per MCF is high, up to a point that equipping the network with 12-core MCFs can yield superior effective capacity than with 19-core MCFs.

[1]  Jose-Luis Izquierdo-Zaragoza,et al.  Evaluating internal blocking in noncontentionless flex-grid ROADMs [invited] , 2015, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[2]  N. Wada,et al.  Impact of Intercore Crosstalk on the Transmission Distance of QAM Formats in Multicore Fibers , 2016, IEEE Photonics Journal.

[3]  Jose A. Lazaro,et al.  Flex-grid/SDM backbone network design with inter-core XT-limited transmission reach , 2016, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[4]  Georgios Zervas,et al.  Resource Allocation for Space-Division Multiplexing: Optical White Box Versus Optical Black Box Networking , 2015, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[5]  M. Koshiba,et al.  409-Tb/s + 409-Tb/s crosstalk suppressed bidirectional MCF transmission over 450 km using propagation-direction interleaving. , 2013, Optics express.

[6]  T. Kawanishi,et al.  Space Division Multiplexed Transmission of 109-Tb/s Data Signals Using Homogeneous Seven-Core Fiber , 2012, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[7]  A. Gnauck,et al.  Penalties from in-band crosstalk for advanced optical modulation formats , 2011, 2011 37th European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communication.

[8]  Juan P. Fernández Palacios,et al.  Planning fixed to flexgrid gradual migration: drivers and open issues , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[9]  P. Poggiolini,et al.  The GN-Model of Fiber Non-Linear Propagation and its Applications , 2014, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[10]  B. Zhu,et al.  Spatial Superchannel Routing in a Two-Span ROADM System for Space Division Multiplexing , 2014, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[11]  Gabriella Bosco,et al.  EGN model of non-linear fiber propagation. , 2014, Optics express.

[12]  R Nejabati,et al.  Fully-elastic multi-granular network with space/frequency/time switching using multi-core fibres and programmable optical nodes. , 2013, Optics express.

[13]  Toshio Morioka,et al.  High-Spatial-Multiplicity Multicore Fibers for Future Dense Space-Division-Multiplexing Systems , 2016, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[14]  Naoya Wada,et al.  19-core MCF transmission system using EDFA with shared core pumping coupled via free-space optics. , 2014, Optics express.

[15]  Brandon Collings,et al.  New devices enabling software-defined optical networks , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[16]  Peter J. Winzer,et al.  Spatial multiplexing: The next frontier in network capacity scaling , 2013 .

[17]  L. Nelson,et al.  Space-division multiplexing in optical fibres , 2013, Nature Photonics.

[18]  S. Tibuleac,et al.  N-degree ROADM architecture comparison: Broadcast-and-select versus route-and-select in 120 Gb/s DP-QPSK transmission systems , 2014, OFC 2014.