Neighbor Selection and Recommendations in Social Bookmarking Tools

Web 2.0 applications innovate traditional informative services providing Web users with a set of tools for publishing and sharing information. Social bookmarking systems are an interesting example of this trend where users generate new contents. Unfortunately, the growing amount of available resources makes hard the task of accessing to relevant information in these environments. Recommender systems face this problem filtering relevant resources connected to users' interests and preferences. In particular, collaborative filtering recommender systems produce suggestions using the opinions of similar users, called the neighbors. The task of finding neighbors is difficult in environment such as social bookmarking systems, since bookmarked resources belong to different domains. In this paper we propose a methodology for partitioning users, tags and resources into domains of interest. Filtering tags and resources in accordance to the specific domains we can select a different set of neighbors for each domain, improving the accuracy of recommendations.

[1]  A. Dattolo,et al.  Visualizing personalized views in virtual museum tours , 2008, 2008 Conference on Human System Interactions.

[2]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Introduction to information retrieval , 2008 .

[3]  Francesco Ricci,et al.  Locally Adaptive Neighborhood Selection for Collaborative Filtering Recommendations , 2008, AH.

[4]  Flaminia L. Luccio,et al.  A State of Art Survey on ZigZag Structures , 2009 .

[5]  Theodor Holm Nelson,et al.  A Cosmology for a Different Computer Universe: Data Model, Mechanisms, Virtual Machine and Visualization Infrastructure , 2006, J. Digit. Inf..

[6]  Gediminas Adomavicius,et al.  Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[7]  Andrei Z. Broder,et al.  Mirror, Mirror on the Web: A Study of Host Pairs with Replicated Content , 1999, Comput. Networks.

[8]  Jonathan L. Herlocker,et al.  Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems , 2004, TOIS.

[9]  Zanardi,et al.  Social Ranking: Finding Relevant Content in Web 2.0 , 2008, ECAI 2008.

[10]  G. Iannizzotto Modeling a publication sharing system 2.0 , 2010 .

[11]  Licia Capra,et al.  Social ranking: uncovering relevant content using tag-based recommender systems , 2008, RecSys '08.

[12]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  Introduction to Information Retrieval , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Antonina Dattolo,et al.  Supporting Personalized User Concept Spaces and Recommendations for a Publication Sharing System , 2009, UMAP.

[14]  John Riedl,et al.  Altruism, Selfishness, and Destructiveness on the Social Web , 2008, AH.

[15]  Bamshad Mobasher,et al.  Personalized recommendation in social tagging systems using hierarchical clustering , 2008, RecSys '08.

[16]  Flaminia L. Luccio,et al.  A formal description of ZigZag-structures , 2009 .

[17]  Antonina Dattolo,et al.  Modeling a publication sharing system 2.0 , 2009, 2009 2nd Conference on Human System Interactions.

[18]  Reyn NakamotoShinsuke,et al.  Tag-Based Contextual Collaborative Filtering , 2007 .