Critical velocity and anaerobic paddling capacity determined by different mathematical models and number of predictive trials in canoe slalom.

The purpose of this study was to analyze if different combinations of trials as well as mathematical models can modify the aerobic and anaerobic estimates from critical velocity protocol applied in canoe slalom. Fourteen male elite slalom kayakers from Brazilian canoe slalom team (K1) were evaluated. Athletes were submitted to four predictive trials of 150, 300, 450 and 600 meters in a lake and the time to complete each trial was recorded. Critical velocity (CV-aerobic parameter) and anaerobic paddling capacity (APC-anaerobic parameter) were obtained by three mathematical models (Linear1=distance-time; Linear 2=velocity-1/time and Non-Linear = time-velocity). Linear 1 was chosen for comparison of predictive trials combinations. Standard combination (SC) was considered as the four trials (150, 300, 450 and 600 m). High fits of regression were obtained from all mathematical models (range - R² = 0.96-1.00). Repeated measures ANOVA pointed out differences of all mathematical models for CV (p = 0.006) and APC (p = 0.016) as well as R² (p = 0.033). Estimates obtained from the first (1) and the fourth (4) predictive trials (150 m = lowest; and 600 m = highest, respectively) were similar and highly correlated (r=0.98 for CV and r = 0.96 for APC) with the SC. In summary, methodological aspects must be considered in critical velocity application in canoe slalom, since different combinations of trials as well as mathematical models resulted in different aerobic and anaerobic estimates. Key pointsGreat attention must be given for methodological concerns regarding critical velocity protocol applied on canoe slalom, since different estimates were obtained depending on the mathematical model and the predictive trials used.Linear 1 showed the best fits of regression. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge and considering practical applications, this model is the easiest one to calculate the estimates from critical velocity protocol. Considering this, the abyss between science and practice may be decreased. Coaches of canoe slalom may simply apply critical velocity protocol and calculate by themselves the aerobic and anaerobic estimates.Still considering practical application, the results of this study showed the possibility of calculating the critical velocity estimates by using just two trials. These results are extremely relevant regarding saving time and easy applicability of this protocol for canoe slalom.

[1]  T J Housh,et al.  Effect of mathematical modeling on the estimation of critical power. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  D. Poole,et al.  Critical speed in the rat: implications for hindlimb muscle blood flow distribution and fibre recruitment , 2010, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  C. Gobatto,et al.  Critical load estimation in young swimming rats using hyperbolic and linear models. , 2013 .

[4]  Bill Davoren,et al.  Critical power may be determined from two tests in elite kayakers , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[5]  G J Bell,et al.  A comparison of critical velocity estimates to actual velocities in predicting simulated rowing performance. , 2000, Canadian journal of applied physiology = Revue canadienne de physiologie appliquee.

[6]  Jeffrey R Stout,et al.  Determination of aerobic and anaerobic performance: a methodological consideration , 2011, Physiological measurement.

[7]  I. D. dos Reis,et al.  Physiological, psychological and biomechanical parameters applied in canoe slalom training: a review , 2014 .

[8]  T J Housh,et al.  A methodological consideration for the determination of critical power and anaerobic work capacity. , 1990, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[9]  T. Housh,et al.  The effect of mathematical modeling on critical velocity , 2001, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[10]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[11]  W G Hopkins,et al.  Reliability of Power in Physical Performance Tests , 2001, Sports medicine.

[12]  D. Poole.  Measurements of the anaerobic work capacity in a group of highly trained runners. , 1986, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  The reliability of the intermittent critical velocity test and assessment of critical rest interval in men and women , 2012, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[14]  P. Zamparo,et al.  The critical velocity in swimming , 2007, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[15]  C. Gobatto,et al.  Relationship between Anaerobic Parameters Provided from MAOD and Critical Power Model in Specific Table Tennis Test , 2012, International Journal of Sports Medicine.

[16]  Lloyd Bb,et al.  The energetics of running: an analysis of world records. , 1966 .

[17]  David W. Hill,et al.  The Critical Power Concept , 1993, Sports medicine.

[18]  Jorge M Zuniga,et al.  Differences Among Estimates of Critical Power and Anaerobic Work Capacity Derived From Five Mathematical Models and the Three-Minute All-Out Test , 2014, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[19]  H. Monod,et al.  THE WORK CAPACITY OF A SYNERGIC MUSCULAR GROUP , 1965 .

[20]  J. Borin,et al.  Anaerobic threshold and critical velocity parameters determined by specific tests of canoe slalom: Effects of monitored training , 2014 .

[21]  D. Bishop,et al.  The Critical Power Function is Dependent on the Duration of the Predictive Exercise Tests Chosen , 1998, International journal of sports medicine.

[22]  Jonathan Fulford,et al.  Muscle metabolic responses to exercise above and below the "critical power" assessed using 31P-MRS. , 2008, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[23]  Anni Vanhatalo,et al.  Critical power: implications for determination of V˙O2max and exercise tolerance. , 2010, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.

[24]  Toshio Moritani,et al.  Determination and validity of critical velocity as an index of swimming performance in the competitive swimmer , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[25]  T. Moritani,et al.  Critical power as a measure of physical work capacity and anaerobic threshold. , 1981, Ergonomics.

[26]  R. Hughson,et al.  A High Velocity Treadmill Running Test to Assess Endurance Running Potential* , 1984, International journal of sports medicine.

[27]  B. B. Lloyd.  The energetics of running: an analysis of world records. , 1966, Advancement of science.

[28]  J. González‐Gallego,et al.  Determination and validity of critical swimming velocity in elite physically disabled swimmers , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.

[29]  A Garfinkel,et al.  Estimation of critical power with nonlinear and linear models. , 1995, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.