EORTC workshop on clinical trial methodology in older individuals with a diagnosis of solid tumors.

BACKGROUND Due to the aging of the population, the number of older patients diagnosed with a malignant disease is increasing. A multidisciplinary approach to the senior adult cancer patient is mandatory, to assure optimal diagnosis and therapeutic management. DESIGN European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) has currently defined senior adult oncology as one of its priorities and has established an active Elderly Task Force (ETF). Under the auspices of the EORTC, the ETF organized a workshop on clinical trial methodology in older cancer patients and in this article, we present the conclusions of this workshop. RESULTS Besides the 'classical' efficacy end points, quality of life, functional status and independence of the patient should be assessed in clinical trials in older patients. The participants of the workshop agreed on the use of a minimum dataset for the assessment of global health and functional status in older cancer patients. The panel also recommended that optimization of collaboration with pharmaceutical industry requires reporting of age-related data (subgroup analyses of clinical trials, age-related pooled analyses and obligatory post-marketing studies in vulnerable and frail older patients). CONCLUSION The identification of proper clinical outcomes and the validation of geriatric screening tools are needed for conducting sound and comparable clinical trials.

[1]  D. Lacombe,et al.  Questionnaires and instruments for a multidimensional assessment of the older cancer patient: what clinicians need to know? , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[2]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2009 , 2009, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[3]  S. Mathoulin-Pélissier,et al.  Validation of a screening test for elderly patients in oncology , 2008 .

[4]  L. Husain,et al.  Choices in cancer treatment: a qualitative study of the older women's (>70 years) perspective , 2008, Psycho-oncology.

[5]  B. Röhrig,et al.  Age, severe comorbidity and functional impairment independently contribute to poor survival in cancer patients , 2007, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[6]  C. Earle,et al.  Surgical mortality in patients with esophageal cancer: development and validation of a simple risk score. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  B. Röhrig,et al.  Impairment in functional status and survival in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia , 2006, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[8]  R. V. van Klaveren,et al.  Prognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancer surgery. , 2006, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[9]  B. Weber,et al.  Comprehensive geriatric assessment predicts tolerance to chemotherapy and survival in elderly patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma: a GINECO study. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[10]  S. Barni,et al.  Pretreatment quality of life and functional status assessment significantly predict survival of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy: a prognostic analysis of the multicenter Italian lung cancer in the elderly study. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  R. Audisio,et al.  Preoperative assessment of surgical risk in oncogeriatric patients. , 2005, The oncologist.

[12]  J. Overcash Using narrative research to understand the quality of life of older women with breast cancer , 2004, Oncology nursing forum.

[13]  G. Nagel,et al.  The impact of comorbidity on the survival of postmenopausal women with breast cancer , 2004, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[14]  Edward L Spitznagel,et al.  Prognostic importance of comorbidity in a hospital-based cancer registry. , 2004, JAMA.

[15]  E. Gore,et al.  Comorbidity and Karnofksy performance score are independent prognostic factors in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: an institutional analysis of patients treated on four RTOG studies. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  M. Bousamra,et al.  Comorbidity and KPS are independent prognostic factors in stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  L. Balducci Geriatric oncology: challenges for the new century. , 2000, European journal of cancer.

[18]  V. Lorusso,et al.  Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine versus vinorelbine alone in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  C. Coltman,et al.  Underrepresentation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer-treatment trials. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  G. Lyman,et al.  Comorbidity and functional status are independent in older cancer patients. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  W. Satariano,et al.  The Effect of Comorbidity on 3-Year Survival of Women with Primary Breast Cancer , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[22]  P. Carter,et al.  The Charlson comorbidity score: a superior comorbidity assessment tool for the prostate cancer multidisciplinary meeting , 2006, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[23]  H. Moffitt Management of Cancer in the Older Person : A Practical Approach , 2000 .

[24]  M P Lawton,et al.  Scales to measure competence in everyday activities. , 1988, Psychopharmacology bulletin.

[25]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.