Analysis of adhoc routing protocols: A retrospective view

Adhoc networking field has been interestingly accepted by the research society due to its surprising features. Almost every aspect of the network has been explored by the researchers at some level of detail. A lot of analyses/surveys have been presented in the literature for showing the performance of well accepted adhoc routing protocols viz. AODV, DSR, AOMDV, CBRP etc. This paper presents some rationale behind these analyses and identifies certain open routing issues which are yet to be worked upon. This work has been done to show and believe that routing in Mobile Adhoc Networks (MANETs) may continue to be an active research effort for the years to come.

[1]  Priyanka Sarkar,et al.  Performance Comparison of AODV, DSR, DYMO and TORA Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2014 .

[2]  Azzedine Boukerche,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 2004, Mob. Networks Appl..

[3]  Samir Ranjan Das,et al.  Simulation‐based performance evaluation of routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks , 2000, Mob. Networks Appl..

[4]  Charu Jain,et al.  Performance Considerations in Implementing Offline Signature Verification System , 2012 .

[5]  David Jörg,et al.  Performance Comparison Of MANET Routing Protocols In Different Network Sizes Computer Science Project , 2004 .

[6]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Behavioral Study of MANET Routing Protocols , 2011 .

[7]  Robert A. Scholtz,et al.  Performance Analysis of , 1998 .

[8]  Vinay Kumar,et al.  Performance Analysis of AODV, CBRP, DSDV and DSR MANET Routing Protocol using NS2 Simulation , 2013 .

[9]  Jalan Sultan Sulaiman,et al.  Modeling and Simulation Of Dynamic Intermediate Nodes And Performance Analysis in MANETS Reactive Routing protocols , 2011 .

[10]  R K Rathy,et al.  Traffic Pattern Based Performance Comparison of AODV , DSDV & OLSR MANET Routing Protocols using Freeway Mobility Model , 2011 .

[11]  Meeta Singh,et al.  Performance Evaluation of AODV and DSR using Random Way Point Mobility Model , 2012 .

[12]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks , 2001, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[13]  Tat-Chee Wan,et al.  Performance Comparison of MANETs Routing Protocols for Dense and Sparse Topology , .

[14]  Kiranveer Kaur,et al.  A Comprehensive Performance Analysis of Proactive and Reactive MANET Routing Protocols , 2014 .

[15]  G. Lakshmikanth,et al.  Simulation based comparative performance analysis of adhoc routing protocols , 2008, TENCON 2008 - 2008 IEEE Region 10 Conference.

[16]  Krishan Kumar,et al.  PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF MOBILE AD HOC NETWORK ROUTING PROTOCOLS , 2014 .

[17]  V. D. Mytri,et al.  Performance Comparison Of AODV, DSR And Cluster Based Routings In Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2013 .

[18]  Bartosz Mielczarek,et al.  Scenario-based performance analysis of routing protocols for mobile ad-hoc networks , 1999, MobiCom.

[19]  Rahul Rishi,et al.  Comparative Analysis of CBRP, DSR, AODV Routing Protocol in MANET , 2010 .

[20]  S. S. Tyagi.  Study of MANET: Characteristics, Challenges, Application and Security Attacks , 2013 .

[21]  S. Jaap,et al.  Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks in City Traffic Scenarios , 2005 .

[22]  Samy S. Abu Naser,et al.  Impact of Electronic Human Resources Management on the Development of Electronic Educational Services in the Universities , 2017 .

[23]  Sabina Barakovi,et al.  Comparison of MANET Routing Protocols in Different Traffic and Mobility Models , 2010 .

[24]  Subir Kumar Sarkar,et al.  Performance Evaluation and Comparison of AODV and AOMDV , 2010 .

[25]  Abhishek Swaroop,et al.  A Comprehensive Performance Analysis of Proactive, Reactive and Hybrid MANETs Routing Protocols , 2011, ArXiv.