Improving the quality and transparency of building life cycle assessment

Life cycle assessment, or LCA, is a powerful method for measuring and reducing a building’s environmental impacts. Its widespread adoption among designers would allow the environmental component of sustainability to gain more traction in design philosophy and client goals. Currently, the stakeholders in building design—both design professionals and clients—have few resources for proper LCA education and use, and there are no common metrics agreed upon for reporting the results of LCAs for buildings. This thesis assesses the strengths and weaknesses of resources available to design practitioners for performing LCA, including a pilot credit in the United States Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design ratings system. A case study performs an LCA comparing two structural materials in an office building. The study aims to be as transparent and repeatable as possible, in order to set a good example on which to model future building LCAs. Based on the critical review of LCA resources and the lessons learned from the case study, eight key points are proposed for improving the quality and transparency of building life cycle assessment projects. Thesis Supervisor: John Ochsendorf Title: Associate Professor, Architecture and Civil and Environmental Engineering

[1]  Michiya Suzuki,et al.  The estimation of energy consumption and amount of pollutants due to the construction of buildings , 1993 .

[2]  Helen Lewis.  Designing for Sustainability , 2012 .

[3]  Vice President,et al.  AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEATING, REFRIGERATION AND AIR CONDITIONING ENGINEERS INC. , 2007 .

[4]  John A. Gambatese,et al.  Energy Consumption of Asphalt and Reinforced Concrete Pavement Materials and Construction , 2005 .

[5]  Frederic P. Miller,et al.  IPCC fourth assessment report , 2009 .

[6]  Sophia Lisbeth Hsu,et al.  Life cycle assessment of materials and construction in commercial structures : variability and limitations , 2010 .

[7]  J. E. Janssen,et al.  Ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality , 1989 .

[8]  Katherine E. Seiferlein,et al.  Annual Energy Review 2007 , 2008 .

[9]  Peter Guthrie,et al.  A framework for clarifying the meaning of Triple Bottom-Line, Integrated, and Sustainability Assessment , 2008 .

[10]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  Relevance of simplifications in LCA of building components , 2009 .

[11]  Grecia R. Matos.  Use of Minerals and Materials in the United States From 1900 Through 2006 , 2009 .

[12]  Man-Shi Low.  Material flow analysis of concrete in the United States , 2005 .

[13]  B. Dawson,et al.  INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) , 2008 .

[14]  N. Fenton.  The Personal Interview , 1934 .

[15]  C. Weber,et al.  Life cycle assessment and grid electricity: what do we know and what can we know? , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  Barbara T. Fichman.  Annual Energy Review 2009 , 2010 .

[17]  Henrikke Baumann,et al.  The hitch hiker's guide to LCA : an orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application , 2004 .

[18]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Quality assessment for LCA , 2000 .

[19]  Omar Swei,et al.  Methods, Impacts, and Opportunities in the Concrete Building Life Cycle , 2011 .

[20]  T. V. Galambos,et al.  Basic steel design with LRFD , 1996 .

[21]  Grecia R. Matos,et al.  Consumption of materials in the United States, 1900-1995 , 1998 .

[22]  S. Kimmel.  Architecture , 2013, Arsham-isms.

[23]  Donald G. Colliver,et al.  Advanced Energy Design Guide for Small Office Buildings , 2005 .