Value-modulated oculomotor capture by task-irrelevant stimuli is a consequence of early competition on the saccade map

Recent research has shown that reward learning can modulate oculomotor and attentional capture by physically salient and task-irrelevant distractor stimuli, even when directing gaze to those stimuli is directly counterproductive to receiving reward. This value-modulated oculomotor capture effect may reflect biased competition in the oculomotor system, such that the relationship between a stimulus feature and reward enhances that feature’s representation on an internal priority map. However, it is also possible that this effect is a result of reward reducing the threshold for a saccade to be made to salient items. Here, we demonstrate value-modulated oculomotor capture when two reward-associated distractor stimuli are presented simultaneously in the same search display. The influence of reward on oculomotor capture is found to be most prominent at the shortest saccade latencies. We conclude that the value-modulated oculomotor capture effect is a consequence of biased competition on the saccade priority map and cannot be explained by a general reduction in saccadic threshold.

[1]  M. Pelley.  The Role of Associative History in Models of Associative Learning: A Selective Review and a Hybrid Model: , 2004 .

[2]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Exogenous visual orienting by reward. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[3]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal the availability of reward. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Rewards teach visual selective attention , 2013, Vision Research.

[5]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[6]  Zhaoping Li.  A saliency map in primary visual cortex , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Programming of endogenous and exogenous saccades: evidence for a competitive integration model. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  R. Ratcliff.  Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  Christopher J. Mitchell,et al.  Attention and associative learning in humans: An integrative review. , 2016, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  N. Mackintosh.  A Theory of Attention: Variations in the Associability of Stimuli with Reinforcement , 1975 .

[12]  Casimir J. H. Ludwig,et al.  Stimulus-driven and goal-driven control over visual selection. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  J. Raymond,et al.  Value associations of irrelevant stimuli modify rapid visual orienting , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Capture of the eyes by relevant and irrelevant onsets , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  Patryk A. Laurent,et al.  Value-driven attentional capture , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Tom Beesley,et al.  When goals conflict with values: counterproductive attentional and oculomotor capture by reward-related stimuli. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Reward Changes Salience in Human Vision via the Anterior Cingulate , 2022 .

[19]  T. Beesley,et al.  Implicit learning of gaze-contingent events , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  G. Bower,et al.  Attention in Learning: Theory and Research , 1968 .

[21]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Learning to Attend and to Ignore Is a Matter of Gains and Losses , 2009, Psychological science.

[22]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[23]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Reward grabs the eye: Oculomotor capture by rewarding stimuli , 2012, Vision Research.

[24]  Casimir J. H. Ludwig,et al.  Target similarity affects saccade curvature away from irrelevant onsets , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  Artem V Belopolsky,et al.  Common Priority Map for Selection History, Reward and Emotion in the Oculomotor System , 2015, Perception.

[26]  M. L. Le Pelley.  The Role of Associative History in Models of Associative Learning: A Selective Review and a Hybrid Model , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[27]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method , 2005 .

[28]  S. Yantis.  3 Goal-Directed and Stimulus-Driven Determinants of Attentional Control , 2000 .

[29]  Steven Yantis,et al.  Value-driven attentional and oculomotor capture during goal-directed, unconstrained viewing , 2012, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[30]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[31]  L. Kamin.  Attention-like processes in classical conditioning , 1967 .

[32]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  J. Theeuwes.  Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  Robin Walker,et al.  Control of voluntary and reflexive saccades , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  J. Theeuwes.  Endogenous and Exogenous Control of Visual Selection , 1994, Perception.

[36]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  The role of stimulus-driven and goal-driven control in saccadic visual selection. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[38]  B. Anderson.  A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[39]  Steven B. Most,et al.  Cognitive control and counterproductive oculomotor capture by reward-related stimuli , 2015 .

[40]  E. Vogel,et al.  Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[41]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Visual Cognition Reward Has a Residual Impact on Target Selection in Visual Search, but Not on the Suppression of Distractors , 2022 .

[42]  Christopher J. Mitchell,et al.  Attention and Associative Learning: From Brain to Behaviour , 2010 .

[43]  Iain D Gilchrist,et al.  Goal-driven modulation of oculomotor capture , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  Steven Yantis,et al.  Reward predictions bias attentional selection , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[45]  Michele A. Basso,et al.  Saccadic eye movements and the basal ganglia , 2011 .

[46]  E. Thorndike.  Animal Intelligence; Experimental Studies , 2009 .

[47]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  A competitive integration model of exogenous and endogenous eye movements , 2010, Biological Cybernetics.

[48]  Steven Yantis,et al.  Learned Value Magnifies Salience-Based Attentional Capture , 2011, PloS one.

[49]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols , 2000, ETRA.

[50]  Okihide Hikosaka,et al.  Reward-Dependent Gain and Bias of Visual Responses in Primate Superior Colliculus , 2003, Neuron.

[51]  R. Klein,et al.  A Model of Saccade Initiation Based on the Competitive Integration of Exogenous and Endogenous Signals in the Superior Colliculus , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  W. Zoest,et al.  Effects of Salience Are , 2008 .