Social Acceptance: Mapping the Perspectives of Stakeholder in the Development of Geothermal Power Plants in West Sumatra, Indonesia

The Indonesian government is pushing for an increase in the development of geothermal power plants. West Sumatra is one of twenty provinces in Indonesia that have geothermal potential. The government has given the company permission to develop geothermal potential in two districts in West Sumatra. Phase I development has been successfully carried out in South Solok Regency, while Solok Regency has experienced problems. Social acceptance is one of the determining factors for the success of the project development. This article aims to look at the perspectives of stakeholders around the geothermal field, and analyze the social acceptance of a geothermal power plant project in West Sumatra. This research uses case study research method. Data collection is done by interview, observation, and document studies (such as Environmental Impact Assessment documents, government regulations on geothermal, and local media news). The results show that there are variations in stakeholder perspectives regarding geothermal power plants. Public acceptance of the geothermal power plant in South Solok Regency is relatively good because the company positions the surrounding community as partners. Social acceptance at the project site in Solok Regency was relatively weak and there was a resistance movement. Socio-political acceptance (by various stakeholders such as the Provincial Government, Regency Government, Nagari Government, and Regional House of Representatives) tends to be substantial due to the multiplier effect of development. This study has limitations in looking at the dynamics of local politics, which are the determinants of support, and the readiness of the Regional Government to face the rejection phenomenon at the local level. This is an input for further research, because in this study it was found that social acceptance requires the support and readiness of the Regional Government. So that the rejection by the local community can be resolved, so that the extraction of electrical energy goes according to the government's target, and the rights of the local community in the project site area are fulfilled.

[1]  Sudarto,et al.  Modeling of SO2 and CH4 Emission Distribution in the Area Mataloko Geothermal Power Plant, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia , 2021, International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics.

[2]  Enrique Rosales-Asensio,et al.  Economic and environmental benefits of geothermal energy in industrial processes , 2021, Renewable Energy.

[3]  Susana Batel,et al.  Research on the social acceptance of renewable energy technologies: Past, present and future , 2020 .

[4]  B. Saputra,et al.  Community Engagement in a Social Movement: A Case of Geothermal Energy Development in Gunung Talang – Bukit Kili area , 2020, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

[5]  B. Kusumasari,et al.  Key Elements of Environmental Justice in the Geothermal Power Plant Resistance Movement , 2019 .

[6]  A. Hermanto,et al.  New geothermal law and its implications for geothermal development in Indonesia , 2019, International Journal of Law and Management.

[7]  Sofía Vargas Payera.  Understanding social acceptance of geothermal energy: Case study for Araucanía region, Chile , 2018 .

[8]  Mahmoudreza Tahmassebpour,et al.  Investigation of the Correlation Between Trust and Reputation in B2C e-Commerce Using Alexa Ranking , 2017, IEEE Access.

[9]  Tanya M. Howard,et al.  Taking away David’s sling*: environmental justice and land-use conflict in extractive resource development , 2017 .

[10]  B. Hogenboom,et al.  Debating Alternative Development at the Mining Frontier: Buen Vivir and the Conflict around El Mirador Mine in Ecuador , 2016 .

[11]  R. Dutu.  Challenges and policies in Indonesia's energy sector , 2016 .

[12]  Matthew S. Winters,et al.  Governance Obstacles to Geothermal Energy Development in Indonesia , 2015 .

[13]  S. Elo,et al.  Qualitative Content Analysis , 2014 .

[14]  Hiroki Hondo,et al.  Determining barriers to developing geothermal power generation in Japan: Societal acceptance by stakeholders involved in hot springs , 2013 .

[15]  Peta Ashworth,et al.  Geothermal technology in Australia: Investigating social acceptance , 2011 .

[16]  Karen Bell,et al.  Environmental justice in Cuba , 2011 .

[17]  Noreddine Ghaffour,et al.  Water Desalination using geothermal energy , 2010 .

[18]  Domenico Giardini,et al.  Geothermal quake risks must be faced , 2009, Nature.

[19]  Ko Nomura.  Democratisation and environmental non-governmental organisations in Indonesia , 2007 .

[20]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .

[21]  Ladislaus Rybach,et al.  Geothermal energy: sustainability and the environment , 2003 .

[22]  I. B. Fridleifsson,et al.  Geothermal energy for the benefit of the people , 2001 .

[23]  Timothy P. McGonigle,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Procedural Justice and Distributive Justice: Implications for Justice Research , 2001 .

[24]  Michael Dear,et al.  Understanding and Overcoming the NIMBY Syndrome , 1992 .

[25]  Teuku Meurah Indra Mahlia,et al.  Potential of geothermal energy for electricity generation in Indonesia: A review , 2016 .

[26]  M. Mwangi.  GEOTHERMAL DEVELOPMENT IN PROTECTED AREAS: KENYAN EXPERIENCE , 2007 .

[27]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches , 1966 .