Yield and spatial supply of bioenergy poplar and willow short-rotation coppice in the UK.

Limited information on likely supply and spatial yield of bioenergy crops exists for the UK. Here, productivities are reported of poplar (Populus spp.) and willow (Salix spp.) grown as short-rotation coppice (SRC), using data from a large 49-site yield trial network. A partial least-squares regression technique was used to upscale actual field trial observations across England and Wales. Spatial productivity was then assessed under different land-use scenarios. Mean modelled yields ranged between 4.9 and 10.7 oven-dry tonnes (odt) ha(-1) yr(-1). Yields were generally higher in willow than in poplar, reflecting the susceptibility of older poplar genotypes to rust and their tendency for single stem dominance. Replacing 10% of arable land, 20% of improved grassland and 100% of set-aside grassland in England and Wales with the three most productive genotypes would yield 13 Modt of biomass annually (supplying 7% of UK electricity production or 48% of UK combined heat and power (CHP) production). Results show existing SRC genotypes have the immediate potential to be an important component of a mixed portfolio of renewables and that, in future, as new and improved genotypes become available, higher yields could extend this potential further.

[1]  K. Taylor,et al.  Particle size analysis , 2013 .

[2]  Pete Smith,et al.  Estimating the pre-harvest greenhouse gas costs of energy crop production , 2008 .

[3]  David R. Turner,et al.  Determination of pH , 2007 .

[4]  Maurizio Mencuccini,et al.  Xylem vulnerability to cavitation varies among poplar and willow clones and correlates with yield. , 2007, Tree physiology.

[5]  A. Lindroth,et al.  The effect of water availability on stand-level productivity, transpiration, water use efficiency and radiation use efficiency of field-grown willow clones , 2007 .

[6]  G. Taylor,et al.  QTL for yield in bioenergy Populus: identifying G×E interactions from growth at three contrasting sites , 2007, Tree Genetics & Genomes.

[7]  P. Nilsson,et al.  The genetics and genomics of the drought response in Populus. , 2006, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[8]  Pete Smith,et al.  Energy crops: current status and future prospects , 2006 .

[9]  Maria Nijnik,et al.  Review of greenhouse gas life cycle emissions, air pollution impacts and economics of biomass production and consumption in Scotland , 2006 .

[10]  S. Polasky,et al.  Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  J. Houghton,et al.  Breaking the Biological Barriers to Cellulosic Ethanol: A Joint Research Agenda , 2006 .

[12]  L. Christersson.  Biomass production of intensively grown poplars in the southernmost part of Sweden: Observations of characters, traits and growth potential , 2006 .

[13]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Genetic variation of leaf traits related to productivity in a Populus deltoides × Populus nigra family , 2006 .

[14]  Pete Smith,et al.  Assessing the potential for biomass energy to contribute to Scotland's renewable energy needs. , 2005 .

[15]  Mark F. Davis,et al.  Phenotypic variation in growth and biomass distribution for two advanced-generation pedigrees of hybrid poplar , 2005 .

[16]  Traian I. Teodorescu,et al.  Field performance and biomass production of 12 willow and poplar clones in short-rotation coppice in southern Quebec (Canada) , 2005 .

[17]  M. Perry,et al.  The generation of monthly gridded datasets for a range of climatic variables over the UK , 2005 .

[18]  R. Lal,et al.  Bioenergy Crops and Carbon Sequestration , 2005 .

[19]  Theo Verwijst,et al.  Above-ground biomass assessments and first cutting cycle production in willow (Salix sp.) coppice¿a comparison between destructive and non-destructive methods , 2004 .

[20]  G. Taylor,et al.  Morphological and physiological traits influencing biomass productivity in short-rotation coppice poplar , 2004 .

[21]  Vincent Mahieu,et al.  Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the european context , 2004 .

[22]  G. Taylor,et al.  Defining leaf traits linked to yield in short-rotation coppice Salix , 2004 .

[23]  E. Kruger,et al.  Photosynthetic consequences of Marssonina leaf spot differ between two poplar hybrids. , 2004, The New phytologist.

[24]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Biomass production of 17 poplar clones in a short-rotation coppice culture on a waste disposal site and its relation to soil characteristics , 2004 .

[25]  Hervé Sinoquet,et al.  A method for describing the canopy architecture of coppice poplar with allometric relationships. , 2003, Tree physiology.

[26]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) enhances biomass production in a short-rotation poplar plantation. , 2003, Tree physiology.

[27]  M. Cannell,et al.  Carbon sequestration and biomass energy offset: theoretical, potential and achievable capacities globally, in Europe and the UK , 2003 .

[28]  D. J. Nixon,et al.  The potential for short rotation energy forestry on restored landfill caps. , 2001, Bioresource technology.

[29]  Brett H. Robinson,et al.  Natural and induced cadmium-accumulation in poplar and willow: Implications for phytoremediation , 2000, Plant and Soil.

[30]  A. Lindroth,et al.  Assessment of regional willow coppice yield in Sweden on basis of water availability , 1999 .

[31]  C. Souch,et al.  Growth, productivity and water use in three hybrid poplar clones. , 1998, Tree physiology.

[32]  S. Allen,et al.  Transpiration from coppiced poplar and willow measured using sap-flow methods. , 1998 .

[33]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Production physiology and morphology of Populus species and their hybrids grown under short rotation. II. Biomass components and harvest index of hybrid and parental species clones , 1997 .

[34]  A. Klute.  Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. , 1988 .

[35]  A. Thomasson,et al.  Water Retention, Porosity and Density of Field Soils , 1977 .

[36]  G. Taylor,et al.  Identifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployment of dedicated bioenergy crops in the UK , 2009 .

[37]  T Wiesenthal,et al.  How much bioenergy can Europe produce without harming the environment , 2006 .

[38]  M. Perry,et al.  The generation of monthly gridded datasets for a range of climatic variables over the United Kingdom , 2004 .

[39]  E. Ögren,et al.  Interrelationships between water use and growth traits in biomass-producing willows , 2003, Trees.

[40]  R. H. Williams,et al.  The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply : a review of 17 studies , 2003 .

[41]  D. G. Christian,et al.  Biomass energy, greenhouse gas abatement and policy integration. , 2001 .

[42]  V. V. KUZNETSOV,et al.  Determination of pH , 2001 .

[43]  K. P. Beckett,et al.  Identifying QTL for yield in UK biomass poplar. , 2001 .

[44]  J. Suárez,et al.  An Ecological Site Classification for Forestry in Great Britain with Special Reference to Grampian, Scotland , 1997 .

[45]  A. Armstrong.  The United Kingdom network of experiments on site/yield relationships for short rotation coppice. , 1997 .

[46]  S. Allen,et al.  Water use of poplar clones grown as short-rotation coppice at two sites in the United Kingdom. , 1997 .

[47]  Edward A. Hansen,et al.  Poplar woody biomass yields: A look to the future , 1991 .

[48]  Wales,et al.  Soil classification for England and Wales : (higher categories) , 1980 .