Comparison of Clinically Adjudicated Versus Flow-Based Adjudication of Revascularization Events in Randomized Controlled Trials
暂无分享,去创建一个
P. Serruys | S. Garg | R. V. van Geuns | W. Wijns | H. Kawashima | Kuniaki Takahashi | M. Ono | Y. Onuma | S. Tu | O. Soliman | H. Hara | Chao Gao | Rutao Wang | Ling Tao | C. Gao | L. Tao | Hideyuki Kawashima
[1] G. Cheon,et al. Association of Quantitative Flow Ratio with Lesion Severity and Its Ability to Discriminate Myocardial Ischemia , 2020, Korean circulation journal.
[2] P. Poole‐Wilson,et al. Diagnostic criteria and adjudication process both determine published event-rates: the ACTION trial experience. , 2007, Contemporary clinical trials.
[3] M. Eliasziw,et al. Outcome assessment by central adjudicators in randomised stroke trials: Simulation of differential and non-differential misclassification , 2020, European stroke journal.
[4] Bram D. Zuckerman,et al. Clinical event adjudication in cardiovascular device trials: An Food and Drug Administration perspective. , 2017, American heart journal.
[5] Eric E. Adelman,et al. Assessment of the End Point Adjudication Process on the Results of the Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke (POINT) Trial , 2019, JAMA network open.
[6] P. Serruys,et al. BuMA Supreme biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus a durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting coronary stent: three-year clinical outcomes of the PIONEER trial. , 2020, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[7] P. Serruys,et al. Safety and efficacy of a sirolimus-eluting coronary stent with ultra-thin strut for treatment of atherosclerotic lesions (TALENT): a prospective multicentre randomised controlled trial , 2019, The Lancet.
[8] J. Reiber,et al. Clinical Implication of Quantitative Flow Ratio After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for 3-Vessel Disease. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[9] C. Held,et al. Lack of Concordance Between Local Investigators, Angiographic Core Laboratory, and Clinical Event Committee in the Assessment of Stent Thrombosis: Results From the TRACER Angiographic Substudy , 2016, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.
[10] G. Campo,et al. Prognostic Value of QFR Measured Immediately After Successful Stent Implantation: The International Multicenter Prospective HAWKEYE Study. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[11] S. Achenbach,et al. Accuracy of Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Coronary Angiography , 2019, Circulation.
[12] Volker Klauss,et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial , 2015, The Lancet.
[13] Volkmar Falk,et al. Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (esc) and the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (eacts) Developed with the Special Contribution of the European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular I , 2022 .
[14] M. Oudkerk,et al. Computational quantitative flow ratio to assess functional severity of coronary artery stenosis. , 2018, International journal of cardiology.
[15] B. Uretsky,et al. Angio-Based Fractional Flow Reserve, Functional Pattern of Coronary Artery Disease, and Prediction of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Result: a Proof-of-Concept Study , 2021, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy.
[16] B. Kahan,et al. A comparison of approaches for adjudicating outcomes in clinical trials , 2017, Trials.
[17] S. Yusuf,et al. Evaluating the benefit of event adjudication of cardiovascular outcomes in large simple RCTs , 2009, Clinical trials.
[18] J. Escaned,et al. Diagnostic Agreement of Quantitative Flow Ratio With Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave‐Free Ratio , 2019, Journal of the American Heart Association : Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease.
[19] P. Serruys,et al. Clinical outcomes of state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary revascularisation in patients with three-vessel disease: two-year follow-up of the SYNTAX II study. , 2019, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[20] Lehana Thabane,et al. An introduction to multiplicity issues in clinical trials: the what, why, when and how. , 2016, International journal of epidemiology.
[21] T. Kakuta,et al. Determinants of visual‐functional mismatches as assessed by coronary angiography and quantitative flow ratio , 2020, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[22] H. Bøtker,et al. Diagnostic Performance of In‐Procedure Angiography‐Derived Quantitative Flow Reserve Compared to Pressure‐Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: The FAVOR II Europe‐Japan Study , 2018, Journal of the American Heart Association.
[23] I. Boutron,et al. Inadequate planning and reporting of adjudication committees in clinical trials: recommendation proposal. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[24] M. Rutten,et al. Validation of 3-Dimensional Quantitative Coronary Angiography based software to calculate Fractional Flow Reserve: Fast Assessment of STenosis severity (FAST)-study. , 2020, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[25] W. Wijns,et al. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis significance from a single angiographic view: A novel method based on bifurcation fractal law , 2021, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[26] P. Serruys,et al. Comparison of Investigator-Reported and Clinical Event Committee-Adjudicated Outcome Events in GLASSY. , 2021, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.
[27] T. Kakuta,et al. Significance of Microvascular Function in Visual—Functional Mismatch Between Invasive Coronary Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve , 2017, Journal of the American Heart Association.
[28] Emil N. Holck,et al. Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis by Quantitative Flow Ratio During Invasive Coronary Angiography , 2018, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.
[29] J. Reiber,et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography: The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[30] R. Mehran,et al. Clinical event committees in coronary stent trials: insights and recommendations based on experience in an unselected study population. , 2012, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[31] A. Jeremias,et al. Use of the Instantaneous Wave‐free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.
[32] Patrick W Serruys,et al. Report of a European Society of Cardiology-European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions task force on the evaluation of coronary stents in Europe: executive summary. , 2015, European heart journal.
[33] J. Spertus,et al. Standardized End Point Definitions for Coronary Intervention Trials: The Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document , 2018, European heart journal.
[34] A. M. Leone,et al. Quantitative Flow Ratio Identifies Nonculprit Coronary Lesions Requiring Revascularization in Patients With ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease , 2018, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.
[35] P. Serruys,et al. Clinical endpoint adjudication in a contemporary all-comers coronary stent investigation: methodology and external validation. , 2013, Contemporary Clinical Trials.
[36] P. Serruys,et al. Final 3-Year Outcomes of MiStent Biodegradable Polymer Crystalline Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Xience Permanent Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent , 2020, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.
[37] Shengshou Hu,et al. Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis : FAVOR II China Study , 2017 .
[38] T. Akasaka,et al. QFR Versus FFR Derived From Computed Tomography for Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.