Association of Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy With Breast Cancer Risk in Women With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants.

Importance Women with pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are at high risk of developing breast and ovarian cancers. They usually undergo intensive cancer surveillance and may also consider surgical interventions, such as risk-reducing mastectomy or risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy has been shown to reduce ovarian cancer risk, but its association with breast cancer risk is less clear. Objective To assess the association of RRSO with the risk of breast cancer in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants. Design, Setting, and Participants This case series included families enrolled in the Breast Cancer Family Registry between 1996 and 2000 that carried an inherited pathogenic variant in BRCA1 (498 families) or BRCA2 (378 families). A survival analysis approach was used that was designed specifically to assess the time-varying association of RRSO with breast cancer risk and accounting for other potential biases. Data were analyzed from August 2019 to November 2020. Exposure Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures In all analyses, the primary end point was the time to a first primary breast cancer. Results A total of 876 families were evaluated, including 498 with BRCA1 (2650 individuals; mean [SD] event age, 55.8 [19.1] years; 437 White probands [87.8%]) and 378 with BRCA2 (1925 individuals; mean [SD] event age, 57.0 [18.6] years; 299 White probands [79.1%]). Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers within 5 years after surgery (hazard ratios [HRs], 0.28 [95% CI, 0.10-0.63] and 0.19 [95% CI, 0.06-0.71], respectively), whereas the corresponding HRs were weaker after 5 years postsurgery (HRs, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.38-0.97] and 0.99 [95% CI; 0.84-1.00], respectively). For BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers who underwent RRSO at age 40 years, the cause-specific cumulative risk of breast cancer was 49.7% (95% CI, 40.0-60.3) and 52.7% (95% CI, 47.9-58.7) by age 70 years, respectively, compared with 61.0% (95% CI, 56.7-66.0) and 54.0% (95% CI, 49.3-60.1), respectively, for women without RRSO. Conclusions and Relevance Although the primary indication for RRSO is the prevention of ovarian cancer, it is also critical to assess its association with breast cancer risk in order to guide clinical decision-making about RRSO use and timing. The results of this case series suggest a reduced risk of breast cancer associated with RRSO in the immediate 5 years after surgery in women carrying BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants, and a longer-term association with cumulative breast cancer risk in women carrying BRCA1 pathogenic variants.

[1]  M. Hooning,et al.  Response: Figure 1. , 2015 .

[2]  J. Lubiński,et al.  The impact of oophorectomy on survival after breast cancer in BRCA1-positive breast cancer patients , 2016, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[3]  M. Rué,et al.  Association of premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy with breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: Maximising bias-reduction. , 2020, European journal of cancer.

[4]  O. Olopade,et al.  Mortality after bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a prospective cohort study. , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.

[5]  S. Narod,et al.  BRCA Carriers, Prophylactic Salpingo-Oophorectomy and Menopause: Clinical Management Considerations and Recommendations , 2012, Women's health.

[6]  O. Olopade,et al.  Predictors of contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers , 2011, British Journal of Cancer.

[7]  Norman Boyd,et al.  The Breast Cancer Family Registry: an infrastructure for cooperative multinational, interdisciplinary and translational studies of the genetic epidemiology of breast cancer , 2004, Breast Cancer Research.

[8]  W. Chung,et al.  Risks of Breast, Ovarian, and Contralateral Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers , 2017, JAMA.

[9]  W. Chung,et al.  Evaluation of Polygenic Risk Scores for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk Prediction in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers , 2017, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  Susan M. Domchek,et al.  Meta-analysis of Risk Reduction Estimates Associated With Risk-Reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation Carriers , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  A. Whittemore,et al.  BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers in the Breast Cancer Family Registry: an open resource for collaborative research , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[12]  V T Farewell,et al.  The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks. , 1978, Biometrics.

[13]  F. Cardoso,et al.  Prevention and screening in BRCA mutation carriers and other breast/ovarian hereditary cancer syndromes: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for cancer prevention and screening. , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[14]  A. Whittemore,et al.  Cohort Profile: The Breast Cancer Prospective Family Study Cohort (ProF-SC) , 2015, International journal of epidemiology.

[15]  J. Horrocks,et al.  Exponential decay for binary time‐varying covariates in Cox models , 2018, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  H. Meijers-Heijboer,et al.  Breast cancer risk after salpingo-oophorectomy in healthy BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: revisiting the evidence for risk reduction. , 2015, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[17]  Svetlana Borovkova,et al.  Analysis of survival data , 2002 .

[18]  W. Chung,et al.  Risk-Reducing Oophorectomy and Breast Cancer Risk Across the Spectrum of Familial Risk , 2018, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  E. Ugwu,et al.  Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. , 2016, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[20]  Rosalind Eeles,et al.  Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality. , 2010, JAMA.

[21]  O. Olopade,et al.  Effect of Oophorectomy on Survival After Breast Cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers. , 2015, JAMA oncology.

[22]  W. Chung,et al.  Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, natural menopause, and breast cancer risk: an international prospective cohort of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers , 2020, Breast Cancer Research.

[23]  T. Rebbeck,et al.  Breast cancer risk following bilateral oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: an international case-control study. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  M. Schmidt,et al.  Lower mitotic activity in BRCA1/2-associated primary breast cancers occurring after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy , 2014, Cancer biology & therapy.

[25]  T. Rebbeck,et al.  Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for the prevention of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast and gynecologic cancer: a multicenter, prospective study. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  Giovanni Parmigiani,et al.  Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  Malka Gorfine,et al.  Frailty‐Based Competing Risks Model for Multivariate Survival Data , 2011, Biometrics.

[28]  B. Karlan,et al.  Bilateral Oophorectomy and Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers , 2017, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[29]  J. Visvader,et al.  RE: Bilateral Oophorectomy and Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers. , 2017, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.