Mechanical Impedance of the Hand Holding a Spherical Tool at Threshold and Suprathreshold Stimulation Levels

We report mechanical impedance of the hand for sinusoidal stimulation at the threshold and suprathreshold levels in the frequency range of 10-500 Hz delivered through a ball-shaped interface. The participants held the ball mounted on a minishaker in a way similar to that of holding a ball interface of a force-feedback device. A minishaker excited the ball in the vertical direction, resulting in vibrations on the skin of the hand in mostly the tangential direction. The position detection threshold curve was similar to that measured earlier using a stylus in the pen-hold posture, but the force detection threshold curve and the mechanical impedance was shifted upwards in the high frequency region. The mechanical impedance at the threshold and suprathreshold levels were essentially the same, indicating that skin characteristics do not change in the dynamic range of tactual perception for the same tool-holding posture

[1]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  T. J. Moore,et al.  Measurement of Specific Mechanical Impedance of the Skin: Effects of Static Force, Site of Stimulation, Area of Probe, and Presence of a Surround , 1972 .

[3]  R. Lundström.  Local vibrations--mechanical impedance of the human hand's glabrous skin. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  S. Bolanowski,et al.  Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touch. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  C. L. Doren.  The effects of a surround on vibrotactile thresholds: Evidence for spatial and temporal independence in the non-Pacinian I (NP I) channel , 1990 .

[6]  R. Howe,et al.  Identification of the mechanical impedance at the human finger tip. , 1997, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[7]  S S Hsiao,et al.  Detection of vibration transmitted through an object grasped in the hand. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Ralph L. Hollis,et al.  Lorentz Magnetic Levitation for Haptic Interaction: Device Design, Performance, and Integration with Physical Simulations , 2000, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[9]  Mandayam A. Srinivasan,et al.  Tangential versus normal displacements of skin: relative effectiveness for producing tactile sensations , 2002, Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. HAPTICS 2002.

[10]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  Perceived Instability of Virtual Haptic Texture. I. Experimental Studies , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[11]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  A Two DOF Controller for a Multi-Finger Tactual Display Using a Loop-Shaping Technique , 2004 .

[12]  J. Wu,et al.  Biodynamic response of human fingers in a power grip subjected to a random vibration. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[13]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  Perceived Instability of Virtual Haptic Texture. II. Effect of Collision-Detection Algorithm , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[14]  Ali Israr,et al.  Detection Threshold and Mechanical Impedance of the Hand in a Pen-Hold Posture , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[15]  Domenico Prattichizzo,et al.  Is haptic watermarking worth it? , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[16]  ChoiSeungmoon,et al.  Perceived Instability of Virtual Haptic Texture , 2007 .

[17]  Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, WHC 2007, Tsukuba, Japan, March 22-24, 2007 , 2007, WHC.

[18]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  Perceived Instability of Virtual Haptic Texture: III. Effect of Update Rate , 2007, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.