Efficient parameter estimation for a methane hydrate model with active subspaces

Methane gas hydrates have increasingly become a topic of interest because of their potential as a future energy resource. There are significant economical and environmental risks associated with extraction from hydrate reservoirs, so a variety of multiphysics models have been developed to analyze prospective risks and benefits. These models generally have a large number of empirical parameters which are not known a priori. Traditional optimization-based parameter estimation frameworks may be ill-posed or computationally prohibitive. Bayesian inference methods have increasingly been found effective for estimating parameters in complex geophysical systems. These methods often are not viable in cases of computationally expensive models and high-dimensional parameter spaces. Recently, methods have been developed to effectively reduce the dimension of Bayesian inverse problems by identifying low-dimensional structures that are most informed by data. Active subspaces is one of the most generally applicable methods of performing this dimension reduction. In this paper, Bayesian inference of the parameters of a state-of-the-art mathematical model for methane hydrates based on experimental data from a triaxial compression test with gas hydrate-bearing sand is performed in an efficient way by utilizing active subspaces. Active subspaces are used to identify low-dimensional structure in the parameter space which is exploited by generating a cheap regression-based surrogate model and implementing a modified Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm. Posterior densities having means that match the experimental data are approximated in a computationally efficient way.

[1]  Tiangang Cui,et al.  Dimension-independent likelihood-informed MCMC , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[2]  Kenichi Soga,et al.  Coupled deformation–flow analysis for methane hydrate extraction , 2010 .

[3]  Tae Sup Yun,et al.  Physical properties of hydrate‐bearing sediments , 2009 .

[4]  Norio Tenma,et al.  Study On Mechanical Behavior For Methane Hydrate Sediment Based On Constant Strain-Rate Test And Unloading-Reloading Test Under Triaxial Compression , 2010 .

[5]  Norio Tenma,et al.  Triaxial compressive properties of artificial methane-hydrate-bearing sediment , 2011 .

[6]  Tim Wildey,et al.  Combining Push-Forward Measures and Bayes' Rule to Construct Consistent Solutions to Stochastic Inverse Problems , 2018, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[7]  Philip John Binning,et al.  Uncertainty evaluation of mass discharge estimates from a contaminated site using a fully Bayesian framework , 2010 .

[8]  Faming Liang,et al.  Statistical and Computational Inverse Problems , 2006, Technometrics.

[9]  P. Constantine,et al.  Active Subspaces of Airfoil Shape Parameterizations , 2017, 1702.02909.

[10]  D. Higdon,et al.  Accelerating Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation by Differential Evolution with Self-Adaptive Randomized Subspace Sampling , 2009 .

[11]  J. C. Santamarina,et al.  Parametric study of the physical properties of hydrate‐bearing sand, silt, and clay sediments: 2. Small‐strain mechanical properties , 2010 .

[12]  Georg Stadler,et al.  Extreme-scale UQ for Bayesian inverse problems governed by PDEs , 2012, 2012 International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis.

[13]  J. Andrade,et al.  On the rheology of dilative granular media: Bridging solid- and fluid-like behavior , 2012 .

[14]  Kenichi Soga,et al.  Critical state soil constitutive model for methane hydrate soil , 2012 .

[15]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Nonlinear Programming , 1997 .

[16]  N. Sultana,et al.  Triggering mechanisms of slope instability processes and sediment failures on continental margins : a geotechnical approach , 2005 .

[17]  GaiXuerui,et al.  A geomechanical model for gas hydrate-bearing sediments , 2017 .

[18]  M. Girolami,et al.  Solving large-scale PDE-constrained Bayesian inverse problems with Riemann manifold Hamiltonian Monte Carlo , 2014, 1407.1517.

[19]  J. Santamarina,et al.  THE IMPACT OF HYDRATE SATURATION ON THE MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND THERMAL PROPERTIES OF HYDRATE-BEARING SAND, SILTS, AND CLAY , 2008 .

[20]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[21]  Sebastian J. Vollmer,et al.  Dimension-Independent MCMC Sampling for Inverse Problems with Non-Gaussian Priors , 2013, SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quantification.

[22]  Jong-Ho Cha,et al.  Laboratory formation of noncementing hydrates in sandy sediments , 2014 .

[23]  R. Dawe,et al.  A Large Potential Methane Source—Natural Gas Hydrates , 2007 .

[24]  兵動 正幸,et al.  BASIC RESEARCH ON THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF METHANE HYDRATE-SEDIMENTS MIXTURE , 2005 .

[25]  George J. Moridis,et al.  Toward Production From Gas Hydrates: Current Status, Assessment of Resources, and Simulation-Based Evaluation of Technology and Potential , 2008 .

[26]  D. Wood Soil Behaviour and Critical State Soil Mechanics , 1991 .

[27]  Tae Sup Yun,et al.  Mechanical properties of sand, silt, and clay containing tetrahydrofuran hydrate , 2007 .

[28]  B. Wohlmuth,et al.  Testing a thermo‐chemo‐hydro‐geomechanical model for gas hydrate‐bearing sediments using triaxial compression laboratory experiments , 2015, 1512.04581.

[29]  Peter Bastian,et al.  Generic implementation of finite element methods in the Distributed and Unified Numerics Environment (DUNE) , 2010, Kybernetika.

[30]  Paul G. Constantine,et al.  Active subspaces for sensitivity analysis and dimension reduction of an integrated hydrologic model , 2015, Comput. Geosci..

[31]  Yukio Nakata,et al.  Effects of dissociation on the shear strength and deformation behavior of methane hydrate-bearing sediments , 2014 .

[32]  James Martin,et al.  A Stochastic Newton MCMC Method for Large-Scale Statistical Inverse Problems with Application to Seismic Inversion , 2012, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[33]  K. Schittkowski,et al.  NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING , 2022 .

[34]  Heikki Haario,et al.  DRAM: Efficient adaptive MCMC , 2006, Stat. Comput..

[35]  S. Pinkert,et al.  Prediction of the mechanical response of hydrate‐bearing sands , 2014 .

[36]  P. Constantine,et al.  Exact active subspace Metropolis-Hastings, with applications to the Lorenz-96 system , 2017, 1712.02749.

[37]  Paul G. Constantine,et al.  Reprint of: Active subspaces for sensitivity analysis and dimension reduction of an integrated hydrologic model , 2016, Comput. Geosci..

[38]  Andreas Dedner,et al.  Advances in DUNE : proceedings of the DUNE User Meeting, held in October 6th-8th 2010 in Stuttgart, Germany , 2012 .

[39]  Andrew M. Stuart,et al.  Inverse problems: A Bayesian perspective , 2010, Acta Numerica.

[40]  Rainer Helmig,et al.  Non-isothermal, multi-phase, multi-component flows through deformable methane hydrate reservoirs , 2015, Computational Geosciences.

[41]  Wolfgang Nowak,et al.  Bayesian assessment of the expected data impact on prediction confidence in optimal sampling design , 2012 .

[42]  D. V. Griffiths,et al.  Return Mapping Algorithms and Stress Predictors for Failure Analysis in Geomechanics , 2009 .

[43]  S. Pinkert The lack of true cohesion in hydrate-bearing sands , 2017 .

[44]  Barbara Wohlmuth,et al.  Semismooth Newton methods for variational problems with inequality constraints , 2010 .

[45]  Kenichi Soga,et al.  Explicitly Coupled Thermal Flow Mechanical Formulation for Gas-Hydrate Sediments , 2013 .

[46]  C.R.I. Clayton,et al.  Influence of gas hydrate morphology on the seismic velocities of sands , 2009 .

[47]  E. Dendy Sloan,et al.  Gas Hydrates: Review of Physical/Chemical Properties , 1998 .

[48]  Janina Decker,et al.  Inelastic Analysis Of Structures , 2016 .

[49]  Y. Rubin,et al.  Bayesian geostatistical design: Task‐driven optimal site investigation when the geostatistical model is uncertain , 2010 .

[50]  Tae Sup Yun,et al.  Observations related to tetrahydrofuran and methane hydrates for laboratory studies of hydrate‐bearing sediments , 2007 .

[51]  Cajo J. F. ter Braak,et al.  Equifinality of formal (DREAM) and informal (GLUE) Bayesian approaches in hydrologic modeling? , 2009 .

[52]  D. Gleich,et al.  Computing active subspaces with Monte Carlo , 2014, 1408.0545.

[53]  Qiqi Wang,et al.  Erratum: Active Subspace Methods in Theory and Practice: Applications to Kriging Surfaces , 2013, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[54]  Paul G. Constantine,et al.  Accelerating Markov Chain Monte Carlo with Active Subspaces , 2016, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[55]  Keith Beven,et al.  Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology , 2001 .

[56]  Paul G. Constantine,et al.  Global sensitivity metrics from active subspaces , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[57]  Pietro Marco Congedo,et al.  Forward and backward uncertainty quantification with active subspaces: Application to hypersonic flows around a cylinder , 2020, J. Comput. Phys..

[58]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo , 2011 .

[59]  Juan J. Alonso,et al.  Active Subspaces for Shape Optimization , 2014 .

[60]  Barbara Wohlmuth,et al.  Nonlinear complementarity functions for plasticity problems with frictional contact , 2009 .

[61]  A. Stuart,et al.  Spectral gaps for a Metropolis–Hastings algorithm in infinite dimensions , 2011, 1112.1392.

[62]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  The Finite Element Method for Solid and Structural Mechanics , 2013 .

[63]  Jonny Rutqvist,et al.  Status of the TOUGH-FLAC simulator and recent applications related to coupled fluid flow and crustal deformations , 2011, Comput. Geosci..

[64]  K. Beven,et al.  Bayesian Estimation of Uncertainty in Runoff Prediction and the Value of Data: An Application of the GLUE Approach , 1996 .

[65]  Ilse C. F. Ipsen,et al.  A Probabilistic Subspace Bound with Application to Active Subspaces , 2018, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl..

[66]  J. Priest,et al.  Strain-Softening Model for Hydrate-Bearing Sands , 2015 .

[67]  D. Owen,et al.  Computational methods for plasticity : theory and applications , 2008 .

[68]  Kazuo Aoki,et al.  Effects of Methane Hydrate Formation On Shear Strength of Synthetic Methane Hydrate Sediments , 2005 .

[69]  Christian Deusner,et al.  Methane Production from Gas Hydrate Deposits through Injection of Supercritical CO2 , 2012 .

[70]  Sayuri Kimoto,et al.  A chemo–thermo–mechanically coupled analysis of ground deformation induced by gas hydrate dissociation , 2010 .

[71]  M. Haeckel,et al.  Estimation of the global inventory of methane hydrates in marine sediments using transfer functions , 2012 .

[72]  Yukio Nakata,et al.  Basic research on the mechanical behavior of methane hydrate-sediments mixture , 2005 .

[73]  Pierre Cochonat,et al.  Effect of gas hydrates melting on seafloor slope instability , 2003 .