“Openness” with and without Information Technology: a framework and a brief history

Over the past two decades, openness (e.g. ‘open’ innovation, ‘open’ education and ‘open’ strategy) has been of increasing interest for researchers and of increasing relevance to practitioners. Openness is often deeply embedded in information technology (IT) and can be both a driver for and a result of innovative IT. To clarify the concept of “openness”, we provide an overview of the scope of cross-disciplinary research on openness. Based on this overview, we develop a framework of openness, which proposes a higher-order concept of “openness” characterised by transparency, access, participation and democracy. The framework further distinguishes open resources, open processes and the effects of opening on particular domains. To provide the historical context and to appreciate the role of IT in openness, we discuss two historical examples of openness: the introduction of an open science model in academia (openness without IT) and the emergence of open source software development (openness with IT). We conclude by highlighting some concerns with and limitations of “openness”.

[1]  Paul A. David,et al.  The Historical Origins of 'Open Science': An Essay on Patronage, Reputation and Common Agency Contracting in the Scientific Revolution , 2008 .

[2]  Paul A. David,et al.  Understanding the emergence of 'open science' institutions: functionalist economics in historical context , 2004 .

[3]  Eric A. von Hippel,et al.  How Open Source Software Works: 'Free' User-to-User Assistance? , 2000 .

[4]  Daniel Schlagwein,et al.  How and why organisations use social media: five use types and their relation to absorptive capacity , 2017, J. Inf. Technol..

[5]  Paul E. Ceruzzi,et al.  A history of modern computing , 1999 .

[6]  Richard P. Gabriel,et al.  Innovation Happens Elsewhere , 2005 .

[7]  N. Storer,et al.  Invisible colleges. Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities , 1972, Medicina e historia.

[8]  John Gallaugher,et al.  Social Media and Customer Dialog Management at Starbucks , 2010, MIS Q. Executive.

[9]  Richard M. Stallman,et al.  The GNU manifesto , 1990 .

[10]  H. Chesbrough.  Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape , 2006 .

[11]  Y. Benkler,et al.  The Wealth of Networks , 2008 .

[12]  Akira Mizunami,et al.  『The open Society and its Enemies, Vol. I : The Spell of Plato』 by Karl. R. Popper, 1ed., 1945, 2ed., 1952 / 『Plato's modern Enemies and the Theory of Natural Law』 by John Wild, 1964 , 1968 .

[13]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  Crowdsourcing As a Solution to Distant Search , 2012 .

[14]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Leveraging Crowdsourcing: Activation-Supporting Components for IT-Based Ideas Competition , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Donald E. Hardaway,et al.  Open Knowledge Creation: Bringing Transparency and Inclusiveness to the Peer Review Process , 2012, MIS Q..

[16]  Julia Eisenberg,et al.  Overcoming the "Ideology of Openness": Probing the Affordances of Social Media for Organizational Knowledge Sharing , 2013, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[17]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[18]  Budi Arief,et al.  focus developing with open source software The Many Meanings of Open Source , 2022 .

[19]  D. Price,et al.  Collaboration in an invisible college. , 1966, The American psychologist.

[20]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  The dark side of transparency , 2017 .

[21]  Chiara Francalanci,et al.  A Survey on Firms' Participation in Open Source Community Projects , 2009, OSS.

[22]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Outsourcing to an Unknown Workforce: Exploring Opensourcing as a Global Sourcing Strategy , 2008, MIS Q..

[23]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Architecture of Participation: Does Code Architecture Mitigate Free Riding in the Open Source Development Model? , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[24]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  C OLLABORATION T HROUGH O PEN S UPERPOSITION : A T HEORY OF THE O PEN S OURCE W AY 1 , 2016 .

[25]  Lorraine Morgan,et al.  Exploring value networks: theorising the creation and capture of value with open source software , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Introduction to JAIS Special Issue on Empirical Research on Free/Libre Open Source Software , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Hajo Hippner,et al.  Crowdsourcing , 2012, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[28]  Matt Germonprez,et al.  Secondary Design: A Case of Behavioral Design Science Research , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  The Rise of Platform Ecosystems , 2014 .

[30]  M. Reitzig,et al.  What’s ‘New’ About New Forms of Organizing? , 2013 .

[31]  Matt Germonprez,et al.  The Potential for Citizen Science in Information Systems Research , 2017, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Michael A. Peters,et al.  Open Education and Education for Openness , 2008 .

[33]  B. Bayus,et al.  Crowdfunding Creative Ideas: The Dynamics of Project Backers in Kickstarter , 2015 .

[34]  Philip Frank Reinders,et al.  The architecture of participation , 2017 .

[35]  A. Sundararajan.  The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism , 2016 .

[36]  Kai Fischbach,et al.  Internal crowdsourcing: conceptual framework, structured review, and research agenda , 2016, J. Inf. Technol..

[37]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Towards an Information Systems Perspective and Research Agenda on Crowdsourcing for Innovation , 2013, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Pamela Samuelson.  IBM's pragmatic embrace of open source , 2006, CACM.

[39]  Detlef Schoder,et al.  Open strategy: Literature review, re-analysis of cases and conceptualisation as a practice , 2017, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Diana Crane,et al.  Invisible colleges. Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities , 1972, Medical History.

[41]  Patrick Finnegan,et al.  Open innovation and public administration: transformational typologies and business model impacts , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[42]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[43]  T. Kuhn.  The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[44]  Maximilian Weber,et al.  Die "Objektivität" sozialwissenschaftlicher undsozialpolitischer Erkenntnis , 1904 .

[45]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Understanding open source software development , 2002 .

[46]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom? An Early Look at Large Numbers of Software 'Apps' Developers and Patterns of Innovation , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[47]  Ethan Bernstein,et al.  The Transparency Paradox , 2012 .

[48]  Paul A. David,et al.  From Keeping Natures Secrets to the Institutionalization of Open Science , 2001 .

[49]  Thomas Hess,et al.  How open is this platform? The meaning and measurement of platform openness from the complementors’ perspective , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[50]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Enterprise Social Media: Definition, History, and Prospects for the Study of Social Technologies in Organizations , 2013, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[51]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  The Algorithm and the Crowd: Considering the Materiality of Service Innovation , 2015, MIS Q..

[52]  H. Tsoukas.  The tyranny of light , 1997 .

[53]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[54]  Rishab Ghosh,et al.  From Keeping “Nature's Secrets” to the Institutionalization of “Open Science” , 2006 .

[55]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Marginality and Problem-Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[56]  J. West,et al.  Open Innovation: The Next Decade , 2014 .

[57]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government , 2012, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[58]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[59]  Paul Michael Di Gangi,et al.  Getting Customers' Ideas to Work for You: Learning from Dell how to Succeed with Online User Innovation Communities , 2010, MIS Q. Executive.

[60]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  From a Firm-Based to a Community-Based Model of Knowledge Creation: The Case of the Linux Kernel Development , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[61]  C. Hou,et al.  What’s New? , 1991, EcoHealth.

[62]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  A framework analysis of the open source software development paradigm , 2000, ICIS.

[63]  Thomas Vogt,et al.  Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science , 2012 .

[64]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Inner Source--Adopting Open Source Development Practices in Organizations: A Tutorial , 2015, IEEE Software.

[65]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy , 2013 .

[66]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  Organizational Learning with Crowdsourcing: The Revelatory Case of LEGO , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[67]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[68]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Open Research in Business and Information Systems Engineering , 2016, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[69]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Opening Platforms: How, When and Why? , 2008 .

[70]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[71]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Editorial: The Role of Information Systems in Enabling Open Innovation , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[72]  Kieran Conboy,et al.  Beyond the customer: Opening the agile systems development process , 2011, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[73]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm , 2001, ArXiv.