Height Correction of Atmospheric Motion Vectors Using Airborne Lidar Observations

Uncertainties in the height assignment of atmospheric motion vectors (AMVs) are the main contributor to the total AMV wind error, and these uncertainties introduce errors that can be horizontally correlated over severalhundredkilometers. Asa consequence, onlyasmallfractionoftheavailableAMVs arecurrentlyused in numerical weather prediction systems. For this reason, alternative approaches for the height assignment of AMVs are investigated in this study: 1) using collocated airborne lidar observations and 2) treating AMVs as layer winds instead of winds at a discrete level. Airborne lidar observations from a field campaign in the western North Pacific Ocean region are used to demonstrate the potential of improving AMV heights in an experimental framework. On average, AMV wind errors are reduced by 10%‐15% when AMV winds are assigned to a 100‐150-hPa-deep layer beneath the cloud top derived from nearby lidar observations. In addition,the lidar‐AMVheightcorrectionisexpectedtoreducethecorrelation ofAMVerrorsaslidarsprovide independent cloud height information. This suggests that satellite lidars may be a valuable source of information for the AMV height assignment in the future. Furthermore, AMVs are compared with dropsonde and radiosonde winds averaged over vertical layers of different depth to investigate the optimal height assignment for AMVs in data assimilation. Consistent with previous studies, it is shown that AMV winds better match sounding winds vertically averaged over ;100hPa than sounding winds at a discrete level. The comparison with deeper layers further reduces the RMS difference but introduces systematic differences of wind speeds.

[1]  Peter Bauer,et al.  Quality Assessment of Cloud-Top Height Estimates From Satellite IR Radiances Using the CALIPSO Lidar , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  C. Velden,et al.  Identifying the Uncertainty in Determining Satellite-Derived Atmospheric Motion Vector Height Attribution , 2009 .

[3]  Koji Yamashita,et al.  The Influence of Assimilating Dropsonde Data on Typhoon Track and Midlatitude Forecasts , 2011 .

[4]  Jean-Noël Thépaut,et al.  The Spatial Structure of Observation Errors in Atmospheric Motion Vectors from Geostationary Satellite Data , 2003 .

[5]  Gerhard Ehret,et al.  The airborne multi-wavelength water vapor differential absorption lidar WALES: system design and performance , 2009 .

[6]  Steven J. Nieman,et al.  A Comparison of Several Techniques to Assign Heights to Cloud Tracers , 1993 .

[7]  C. Velden,et al.  Recent Innovations in Deriving Tropospheric Winds from Meteorological Satellites , 2005 .

[8]  Ricardo Todling,et al.  The THORPEX Observation Impact Intercomparison Experiment , 2010 .

[9]  Martin Wirth,et al.  Experimental assimilation of DIAL water vapour observations in the ECMWF global model , 2011 .

[10]  Sim D. Aberson,et al.  The Impact of Dropwindsonde Observations on Typhoon Track Forecasts in DOTSTAR and T-PARC , 2011 .

[11]  Stephan Rahm,et al.  Influence of airborne Doppler wind lidar profiles near Typhoon Sinlaku on ECMWF and NOGAPS forecasts , 2012 .

[12]  Jean-Noël Thépaut,et al.  Impact of MODIS polar winds in ECMWF's 4DVAR data assimilation system , 2004 .