Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND Extensive mammographic density is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer and makes the detection of cancer by mammography difficult, but the influence of density on risk according to method of cancer detection is unknown. METHODS We carried out three nested case-control studies in screened populations with 1112 matched case-control pairs. We examined the association of the measured percentage of density in the baseline mammogram with risk of breast cancer, according to method of cancer detection, time since the initiation of screening, and age. RESULTS As compared with women with density in less than 10% of the mammogram, women with density in 75% or more had an increased risk of breast cancer (odds ratio, 4.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0 to 7.4), whether detected by screening (odds ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 2.0 to 6.2) or less than 12 months after a negative screening examination (odds ratio, 17.8; 95% CI, 4.8 to 65.9). Increased risk of breast cancer, whether detected by screening or other means, persisted for at least 8 years after study entry and was greater in younger than in older women. For women younger than the median age of 56 years, 26% of all breast cancers and 50% of cancers detected less than 12 months after a negative screening test were attributable to density in 50% or more of the mammogram. CONCLUSIONS Extensive mammographic density is strongly associated with the risk of breast cancer detected by screening or between screening tests. A substantial fraction of breast cancers can be attributed to this risk factor.

[1]  E. Fishell,et al.  Radio-free America: what to do with the waste. , 1994, Environmental health perspectives.

[2]  P. C. Johns,et al.  X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  A. Miller,et al.  Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  J. Wolfe Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern , 1976, Cancer.

[6]  V. McCormack,et al.  Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[7]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic signs of potential relevance to breast cancer risk: the agreement of radiologists' classification , 1996, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[8]  P. Simpson,et al.  Statistical methods in cancer research , 2001, Journal of surgical oncology.

[9]  Jennifer A Harvey,et al.  Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk. , 2004, Radiology.

[10]  N. Boyd,et al.  The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  D. Kopans,et al.  Occult breast abnormalities: percutaneous preoperative needle localization. , 1984, Radiology.

[12]  J. Wolfe Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. , 1976, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Mark A Helvie,et al.  Invasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative result: relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic factors. , 2004, Radiology.

[14]  Navin Parekh,et al.  Effects of mammographic density and benign breast disease on breast cancer risk (United States) , 2001, Cancer Causes & Control.

[15]  Emily White,et al.  Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital Versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  A. Miller,et al.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years. , 1992, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[18]  S. Duffy,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and mode of detection: implications for the breast screening programme , 1998, Journal of medical screening.

[19]  A. Miller,et al.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years. , 1992, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[20]  N. Boyd,et al.  An assessment of the influence of clinical breast examination reports on the interpretation of mammograms in a breast screening program. , 1998, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[21]  E. Sickles Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers. , 1986, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  J. Otten,et al.  Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: Masking bias or causality? , 1998, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[23]  C R Key,et al.  Biologic characteristics of interval and screen-detected breast cancers. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[24]  J Whitehead,et al.  Wolfe mammographic parenchymal patterns. A study of the masking hypothesis of Egan and Mosteller , 1985, Cancer.

[25]  Pavel Crystal,et al.  Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  A. Paterson,et al.  Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer. , 2005, The Lancet. Oncology.

[27]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  Malcolm C Pike,et al.  Mammographic density and breast cancer in three ethnic groups. , 2003, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[29]  N. Breslow,et al.  Statistical methods in cancer research. Vol. 1. The analysis of case-control studies. , 1981 .

[30]  P. Porter,et al.  Breast tumor characteristics as predictors of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[31]  R N Hoover,et al.  Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer , 1991, Cancer.

[32]  L. Rybicki,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer in premenopausal women. , 2005, American journal of surgery.

[33]  N. Boyd,et al.  Case-control study of factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.