Hemispheric asymmetries in global⧹local processing are modulated by perceptual salience

It has been claimed that a left hemisphere bias toward local and right hemisphere bias toward global visual processing can be explained in terms of specialization for relatively high and low spatial frequencies, respectively. Using non-representational figures, we tested this hypothesis in experiment 1 using positron emission tomography (PET) measures of cerebral activity in 10 normal volunteers. In each block of trials subjects viewed either a relatively high or a relatively low spatial frequency grating. The orientation (vertical or horizontal) of the grating changed from trial to trial. In a directed attention task, subjects reported the orientation of either the whole stimulus (globally directed attention) or the orientation of the component parts thereof (locally directed attention). A significant interaction between hierarchical processing level (global or local) and stimulus level (relatively high or relatively low spatial frequency within the absolute low spatial frequency range) was found. Globally directed attention led to significantly increased cerebral activity in the right hemisphere when relatively high spatial frequency stimuli were used but not when relatively low spatial frequency stimuli were used. Likewise, locally directed attention increased cerebral activity when low but not high spatial frequency stimuli were used. On the basis of these results we suggest that perceptual salience of the global or local form modulates hemispheric processing asymmetries in early visual cortex. In experiment 2, the perceptual salience of global form in relatively high spatial frequency stimuli and of local form in relatively low spatial frequency stimuli was confirmed in a reaction time (RT) study. In combination, the results of the two experiments suggest that perceptual salience takes precedence over spatial frequency (within the range studied here) in determining the cerebral organization of global/local processing.

[1]  G L Shulman,et al.  The Role of Spatial-Frequency Channels in the Perception of Local and Global Structure , 1986, Perception.

[2]  H. Spitzer,et al.  Increased attention enhances both behavioral and neuronal performance. , 1988, Science.

[3]  C D Frith,et al.  Space-based and object-based visual attention: shared and specific neural domains. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[6]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees? , 1996, Nature.

[7]  B. C. Motter.  Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[9]  L. Robertson,et al.  Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  J. Hellige.  Hemispheric asymmetry for components of visual information processing. , 1995 .

[11]  E. Marg.  A VISION OF THE BRAIN , 1994 .

[12]  N. Lavie.  Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  The neurology of visual attention. , 1995 .

[14]  L C Robertson,et al.  The processing of hierarchical stimuli: Effects of retinal locus, locational uncertainty, and stimulus identity , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Detection of Thirty-Second Cognitive Activations in Single Subjects with Positron Emission Tomography: A New Low-Dose H215O Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Three-Dimensional Imaging Technique , 1993, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[16]  M. Taussig.  The Nervous System , 1991 .

[17]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  A Noninvasive Positron Computed Tomography Technique Using Oxygen-15-Labeled Water for the Evaluation of Neurobehavioral Task Batteries , 1985, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[18]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[19]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  D L Bailey,et al.  Fully Three-dimensional Reconstruction For A Pet Camera With Retractable Septa , 1990, 1990 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[21]  J Sergent,et al.  Role of the input in visual hemispheric asymmetries. , 1983, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  R. Kimchi.  Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  L. Lagasse,et al.  Effects of good form and spatial frequency on global precedence , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  A. Nowicka,et al.  VISUAL-SPATIAL-FREQUENCY MODEL OF CEREBRAL ASYMMETRY : A CRITICAL SURVEY OF BEHAVIORAL AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL STUDIES , 1996 .

[25]  R. Knight,et al.  Component mechanisms underlying the processing of hierarchically organized patterns: inferences from patients with unilateral cortical lesions. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  Antígona Martínez,et al.  Hemispneric asymmetries in global and local processing: evidence from fMRI , 1997, Neuroreport.

[27]  R. Ivry,et al.  The two sides of perception , 1997 .

[28]  R. S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for global and local processing: the effect of stimulus category , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Retinotopic Maps in Human Prestriate Visual Cortex: The Demarcation of Areas V2 and V3 , 1995, NeuroImage.

[30]  S. Rapcsak,et al.  Hierarchical Stimuli and Hemispheric Specialization: Two Case Studies , 1994, Cortex.

[31]  C D Frith,et al.  Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  H. Heinze,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical stimulus processing: Dissociation between onset and later stages of global and local target processing , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[34]  M. Lamb,et al.  The Two Sides of Perception , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  R. A. Kinchla,et al.  Attending to different levels of structure in a visual image , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  H. Hughes,et al.  Global Precedence, Spatial Frequency Channels, and the Statistics of Natural Images , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.