Pesticide Reduction Sustainability of Bt Technology in India

The primary focus of the study is the changes that occurred in the pesticide-use structure of cotton production sector of India, owing to the diffusion of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) technology. Studies from different countries show that transgenic Bt crops can reduce chemical pesticide use with positive economic, environmental, and health effects. However, most of these studies build on cross-section survey data, so that longer term effects are uncertain. Bt resistance and secondary pest outbreaks may potentially reduce or eliminate the benefits over time, especially in developing countries where refuge strategies are often not implemented. Here, data from a unique panel survey of cotton farmers, conducted in India between 2002 and 2008, show that the Bt pesticide reducing effect has been sustainable. In spite of an increase in pesticide sprays against secondary pests, total pesticide use has decreased significantly over time. Bt has also reduced pesticide applications by non-Bt farmers. These results mitigate the concern that Bt technology would soon become obsolete in small farmer environments. The survey data on actual pesticide use in farmers’ fields complement previous entomological research.

[1]  G. Matthews,et al.  Insect Pests of Cotton , 1994 .

[2]  Matin Qaim,et al.  Bt cotton and pesticide use in Argentina: economic and environmental effects , 2005, Environment and Development Economics.

[3]  Ada Wossink,et al.  Environmental and cost efficiency of pesticide use in transgenic and conventional cotton production , 2006 .

[4]  Scott Rozelle,et al.  Bt Cotton in China: Are Secondary Insect Infestations Offsetting the Benefits in Farmer Fields? , 2009 .

[5]  A. Abdulai,et al.  The Adoption of Genetically Modified Cotton and Poverty Reduction in Pakistan , 2010 .

[6]  Yanhui Lu,et al.  Mirid Bug Outbreaks in Multiple Crops Correlated with Wide-Scale Adoption of Bt Cotton in China , 2010, Science.

[7]  J. Carpenter,et al.  Peer-reviewed surveys indicate positive impact of commercialized GM crops , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  Jikun Huang,et al.  Genetically Modified Cotton and Farmers' Health in China , 2004, International journal of occupational and environmental health.

[9]  Richard Bennett,et al.  Explaining contradictory evidence regarding impacts of genetically modified crops in developing countries. Varietal performance of transgenic cotton in India , 2005, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[10]  Hermann Waibel,et al.  Assessing the profitability of different crop protection strategies in cotton: Case study results from Shandong Province, China , 2007 .

[11]  Rosalind J Wright,et al.  Areawide Suppression of European Corn Borer with Bt Maize Reaps Savings to Non-Bt Maize Growers , 2010, Science.

[12]  Jian-Zhou Zhao,et al.  Insect resistance management in GM crops: past, present and future , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[13]  A. Shelton,et al.  Transgenic plants expressing two Bacillus thuringiensis toxins delay insect resistance evolution , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  V. Krishna,et al.  Potential impacts of Bt eggplant on economic surplus and farmers' health in India , 2008 .

[15]  David Zilberman,et al.  Adoption of Bt Cotton and Impact Variability: Insights from India , 2006 .

[16]  Kongming Wu,et al.  Suppression of Cotton Bollworm in Multiple Crops in China in Areas with Bt Toxin–Containing Cotton , 2008, Science.

[17]  S. C. Harland Cotton in India , 1961, Nature.

[18]  B. Tabashnik,et al.  Field-Evolved Insect Resistance to Bt Crops: Definition, Theory, and Data , 2009, Journal of economic entomology.

[19]  M. Qaim,et al.  The Impact of Bt Cotton on Poor Households in Rural India , 2008 .

[20]  Jikun Huang,et al.  Insect-Resistant GM Rice in Farmers' Fields: Assessing Productivity and Health Effects in China , 2005, Science.

[21]  M. Qaim The Economics of Genetically Modified Crops , 2009 .

[22]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Bt Cotton and Maize on Nontarget Invertebrates , 2007, Science.

[23]  B. M. Khadi,et al.  Cotton in India , 2010 .

[24]  Clive James,et al.  Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2006. , 2006 .

[25]  R. Bennett,et al.  Bias from farmer self-selection in genetically modified crop productivity estimates: Evidence from Indian data , 2007 .

[26]  David Zilberman,et al.  Yield Effects of Genetically Modified Crops in Developing Countries , 2003, Science.

[27]  M. Qaim,et al.  Commercialized GM crops and yield , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[28]  P. Pinstrup-Andersen,et al.  Bt-cotton and secondary pests , 2008 .

[29]  Scott Rozelle,et al.  Plant Biotechnology in China , 2002, Science.

[30]  K. Kranthi,et al.  Widespread infestation of the exotic mealybug species, Phenacoccus solenopsis (Tinsley) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), on cotton in India , 2009, Bulletin of Entomological Research.

[31]  Matin Qaim,et al.  Estimating the Adoption of Bt Eggplant in India: Who Benefits from Public-Private Partnership? , 2007 .

[32]  Timothy J. Dennehy,et al.  Long-term regional suppression of pink bollworm by Bacillus thuringiensis cotton , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.