Conceptual metaphors and embodied cognition: EEG coherence reveals brain activity differences between primary and complex conceptual metaphors during comprehension

Because cognitive linguists assert that primary and complex conceptual metaphors are theoretical constructs with a plausible yet uncertain psychological reality, this study investigated if and how EEG coherence would differ between the two types of metaphor during comprehension. Hypothesis testing implied formalizing an algorithm of conceptual metaphor processing before collecting EEG data from 50 normal adults and looking for condition-specific EEG coherence patterns. Results confirm the psychological reality of two metaphor categories. However, they also support alternative conceptions regarding the algorithm and nature of complex metaphors, developed and discussed in this article.

[1]  O. Renaud,et al.  A tutorial for analyzing human reaction times: How to filter data, manage missing values, and choose a statistical model , 2011, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[2]  Karsten Hoechstetter,et al.  BESA Source Coherence: A New Method to Study Cortical Oscillatory Coupling , 2003, Brain Topography.

[3]  M. Knyazeva,et al.  EEG coherence studies in the normal brain and after early-onset cortical pathologies , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[4]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience , 2004 .

[5]  Sabine Weiss,et al.  The contribution of EEG coherence to the investigation of language , 2003, Brain and Language.

[6]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Interpreting and evaluating metaphors , 1991 .

[7]  M. Schnitzer,et al.  A neuropsychological theory of metaphor , 2005 .

[8]  Michael G. Johnson,et al.  Some cognitive aspects of figurative language: Association and metaphor , 1979 .

[9]  Christopher Barry,et al.  When Does a Deep Dyslexic Make a Semantic Error? The Roles of Age-of-Acquisition, Concreteness, and Frequency , 2000, Brain and Language.

[10]  S. Gerhand,et al.  Both concreteness and age-of-acquisition affect reading accuracy but only concreteness affects comprehension in a deep dyslexic patient , 2003, Brain and Language.

[11]  Christopher Johnson,et al.  Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of polysemy: The case of see , 1999 .

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic representations and generative models of brain function , 2001, Brain Research Bulletin.

[13]  Janne Bondi Johannessen,et al.  Glossa: a Multilingual, Multimodal, Configurable User Interface , 2008, LREC.

[14]  G. Fauconnier,et al.  The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind''s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books , 2002 .

[15]  Michael Wilson,et al.  MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00 , 1988 .

[16]  J. Grady.  THEORIES ARE BUILDINGS revisited , 1997 .

[17]  S. Vereza.  Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 2001 .

[18]  J. Pynte,et al.  The Time-Course of Metaphor Comprehension: An Event-Related Potential Study , 1996, Brain and Language.

[19]  Timothy J. Robinson,et al.  Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications , 2002 .

[20]  F. Varela,et al.  Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[21]  Renata de Oliveira Razuk.  Spared access to idiomatic and literal meanings: a single-case approach , 2006 .

[22]  Jeffrey R. Binder,et al.  Modulation of the semantic system by word imageability , 2005, NeuroImage.

[23]  Andrew Parker,et al.  Concreteness effects revisited: The influence of dynamic visual noise on memory for concrete and abstract words , 2009, Memory.

[24]  J. Grady,et al.  Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration , 2005 .

[25]  Dietrich Lehmann,et al.  Coherence and phase locking in the scalp EEG and between LORETA model sources, and microstates as putative mechanisms of brain temporo-spatial functional organization , 2006, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[26]  G. A. Marcoulides.  Multilevel Analysis Techniques and Applications , 2002 .