Are two-centimeter breast cancers large or small?
暂无分享,去创建一个
J. Iqbal | A. Jakubowska | J. Lubiński | S. Narod | P. Sun | C. Cybulski | T. Byrski | T. Huzarski | J. Gronwald | C. Cybulski | T. Huzarski | T. Byrski | J. Gronwald | A. Jakubowska | S. A. Narod | J. Iqbal | P. Sun | J. Lubinski | Javaid Iqbal
[1] P. Saigo,et al. A long-term follow-up study of survival in stage I (T1N0M0) and stage II (T1N1M0) breast carcinoma. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[2] C. Begg,et al. The effect of changes in tumor size on breast carcinoma survival in the U.S.: 1975–1999 , 2005, Cancer.
[3] S. Sabri,et al. Reply to P.G. Tsoutsou et al and A.H. Trainer et al , 2011 .
[4] C. Geyer,et al. Prognosis after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrences in five National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project node-positive adjuvant breast cancer trials. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[5] S. Narod,et al. Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Features and Patterns of Recurrence , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.
[6] M. Federico,et al. Tumor size, node status, grading, HER2 and estrogen receptor status still retain a strong value in patients with operable breast cancer diagnosed in recent years , 2013, International journal of cancer.
[7] N. Lin,et al. Effect of very small tumor size on cancer-specific mortality in node-positive breast cancer. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[8] S Hellman,et al. Pathological prognostic factors in stage I (T1N0M0) and stage II (T1N1M0) breast carcinoma: a study of 644 patients with median follow-up of 18 years. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[9] C. Lawton. Nodal status and clinical outcomes in a large cohort of patients with triple-negative breast cancer , 2012 .
[10] S. Singletary,et al. Prognostic Factors in Node-Negative Breast Cancer: A Review of Studies With Sample Size More Than 200 and Follow-Up More Than 5 Years , 2002, Annals of surgery.
[11] J. Crowe,et al. Primary tumor size. Relevance to breast cancer survival. , 1992, Archives of surgery.
[12] C. Sotiriou,et al. Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles in breast cancer: toward a unified understanding of breast cancer subtyping and prognosis signatures , 2007, Breast Cancer Research.
[13] Keda Yu,et al. Effect of large tumor size on cancer-specific mortality in node-negative breast cancer. , 2012, Mayo Clinic proceedings.
[14] J. Wisell,et al. Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles in breast cancer: toward a unified understanding of breast cancer subtyping and prognosis signatures , 2010 .
[15] Gord Glendon,et al. Association Between BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations and Survival in Women With Invasive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer , 2012 .
[16] T. Sellers,et al. Long-term ovarian cancer survival associated with mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[17] Melissa Bondy,et al. Residual risk of breast cancer recurrence 5 years after adjuvant therapy. , 2008, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[18] Douglas F. Easton,et al. Association between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and survival in women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. , 2012, JAMA.
[19] O. Olopade,et al. Should all BRCA1 mutation carriers with stage I breast cancer receive chemotherapy? , 2013, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.