From outcrop to reservoir simulation model: Workflow and procedures

Advances in data capture and computer technology have made possible the collection of three-dimensional, high-resolution, digital geological data from outcrop analogs. This paper presents new methodologies for the acquisition and utilization of three-dimensional information generated by ground-based laser scanning (lidar) of outcrops. A complete workflow is documented—from outcrop selection through data collection, processing and building of virtual outcrops—to geological interpretation and the building of geocellular models using an industry-standard, reservoir-modeling software. Data sets from the Roda Sandstone in the Spanish Pyrenees and the Grabens region of Canyon-lands National Park, Utah, USA, are used to illustrate the application of the workflow to sedimentary and structural problems at a reservoir scale. Subsurface reservoir models are limited by available geological data. Outcrop analogs from comparable systems, such as the Roda Sandstone and the Grabens, are commonly used to provide additional input to models of the subsurface. Outcrop geocellular models can be analyzed both statically and dynamically, wherein static examination involves visual inspection and the extraction of quantitative data on body geometry, and dynamic investigation involves the simulation of fluid flow through the analog model. The work presented in this study demonstrates the utility of lidar as a data collection technique for the building of more accurate outcrop-based geocellular models. The aim of this publication is to present the first documentation of a complete workflow that extends from outcrop selection to model investigation through the presentation of two worked data sets.

[1]  R. Færseth Interaction of Permo-Triassic and Jurassic extensional fault-blocks during the development of the northern North Sea , 1996, Journal of the Geological Society.

[2]  G. McMechan,et al.  Integrated Study of Ancient Delta-Front Deposits, Using Outcrop, Ground-Penetrating Radar, and Three-Dimensional Photorealistic Data: Cretaceous Panther Tongue Sandstone, Utah, U.S.A. , 2005 .

[3]  Ragnar Hauge,et al.  Modeling of Fluvial Reservoirs with Object Models , 1998 .

[4]  I. Trinks,et al.  Unlocking the spatial dimension: digital technologies and the future of geoscience fieldwork , 2005, Journal of the Geological Society.

[5]  Robert W. Williams,et al.  Sedimentary environments offshore norway — an overview , 2001 .

[6]  A. Martinius,et al.  Origin of nodules in mixed siliciclastic-carbonate sandstones, the Lower Eocene Roda Sandstone Member, southern Pyrenees, Spain , 1990 .

[7]  G. Hampson Discontinuity Surfaces, Clinoforms, and Facies Architecture in a Wave-Dominated, Shoreface-Shelf Parasequence , 2000 .

[8]  Janok P. Bhattacharya,et al.  Sedimentology, Statistics, and Flow Behavior for a Tide-influenced Deltaic Sandstone, Frontier Formation, Wyoming, United States , 2004 .

[9]  Jamie K. Pringle,et al.  Virtual outcrop models of petroleum reservoir analogues: a review of the current state-of-the-art , 2006 .

[10]  J. Underhill,et al.  An integrated study of the garn and melke formations (middle to upper jurassic) of the smorbukk area, halten terrace, mid-norway , 2001 .

[11]  Matthew D. Jackson,et al.  Three-dimensional reservoir characterization and flow simulation of heterolithic tidal sandstones , 2005 .

[12]  A. Martinius,et al.  Fossiliferous intervals and sequence boundaries in shallow marine, fan-deltaic deposits (Early Eocene, southern Pyrenees, Spain) , 1996 .

[13]  Jamie K. Pringle,et al.  Topics: Virtual geological outcrops – fieldwork and analysis made less exhaustive? , 2004 .

[14]  Wei Xiong,et al.  Use of a three‐dimensional laser scanner to digitally capture the topography of sand dunes in high spatial resolution , 2004 .

[15]  C. Kerans,et al.  Digital Outcrop Models: Applications of Terrestrial Scanning Lidar Technology in Stratigraphic Modeling , 2005 .

[16]  D. Sanderson,et al.  Displacements, segment linkage and relay ramps in normal fault zones , 1991 .

[17]  J. A. Howell,et al.  INTEGRATION OF TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING , DIGITAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND GEOSTATISTICAL METHODS FOR HIGH-RESOLUTION MODELLING OF GEOLOGICAL OUTCROPS , 2006 .

[18]  Chang-Shu Yang,et al.  The estimation of palaeohydrodynamic processes from subtidal deposits using time series analysis methods , 1985 .

[19]  E. Halland,et al.  Sedimentology and Shale Modeling of a Sandstone-Rich Fluvial Reservoir: Upper Statfjord Formation, Statfjord Field, Northern North Sea , 1993 .

[20]  Aloysius Wehr,et al.  Airborne laser scanning—an introduction and overview , 1999 .

[21]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  A comparison between photogrammetry and laser scanning , 1999 .

[22]  Xueming Xu,et al.  Digital Geologic Mapping of the Ferron Sandstone, Muddy Creek, Utah, with GPS and Reflectorless Laser Rangefinders , 2001, GPS Solutions.

[23]  Andrew Richard Gardiner,et al.  Best practice stochastic facies modeling from a channel-fill turbidite sandstone analog (the Quarry outcrop, Eocene Ainsa basin, northeast Spain) , 2006 .

[24]  F. Ackermann Airborne laser scanning : present status and future expectations , 1999 .

[25]  John P. Grotzinger,et al.  Digital characterization of thrombolite-stromatolite reef distribution in a carbonate ramp system (terminal Proterozoic, Nama Group, Namibia) , 2005 .

[26]  J. Stafleu,et al.  Outcrop topography as a proxy of acoustic impedance in synthetic seismograms , 1996 .

[27]  J. Muñoz,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of geological surfaces: An example of growth strata and turbidite systems from the Ainsa basin (Pyrenees, Spain) , 2004 .

[28]  Jamie K. Pringle,et al.  3D high-resolution digital models of outcrop analogue study sites to constrain reservoir model uncertainty: an example from Alport Castles, Derbyshire, UK , 2004, Petroleum Geoscience.

[29]  J. Muñoz,et al.  Low-amplitude, synsedimentary folding of a deltaic complex: Roda Sandstone (lower Eocene), South-Pyrenean Foreland Basin , 2003 .

[30]  The Topographic Features of Lake Shores , 1886, Nature.

[31]  I. D. Bryant,et al.  Quantitative clastic reservoir geological modelling: problems and perspectives , 2009 .

[32]  R. Tenghamn PGS shows off electrical marine vibrator to capture ‘alternative’ seismic source market , 2006 .

[33]  E. Baltsavias,et al.  Digital Surface Modelling by Airborne Laser Scanning and Digital Photogrammetry for Glacier Monitoring , 2001 .

[34]  J. Howell,et al.  Are relay ramps conduits for fluid flow? Structural analysis of a relay ramp in Arches National Park, Utah , 2007, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[35]  G. Hampson,et al.  Geomorphological and sequence stratigraphic variability in wave‐dominated, shoreface‐shelf parasequences , 2003 .

[36]  Richard A. Schultz,et al.  Processes of Faulting in Jointed Rocks of Canyonlands National Park, Utah , 1999 .

[37]  George A. McMechan,et al.  Creating virtual 3-D outcrop , 2000 .

[38]  D. Sanderson,et al.  Geometry and Development of Relay Ramps in Normal Fault Systems , 1994 .

[39]  A. Reynolds Dimensions of Paralic Sandstone Bodies , 1999 .

[40]  J. Cartwright,et al.  Relay-ramp forms and normal-fault linkages, Canyonlands National Park, Utah , 1994 .

[41]  Brian J. Willis,et al.  Quantitative Outcrop Data for Flow Simulation , 2000 .

[42]  N. Molenaar Calcite cementation in shallow marine Eocene sandstones and constraints of early diagenesis , 1990, Journal of the Geological Society.