“Coherent Arbitrariness”: Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences

In six experiments we show that initial valuations of familiar products and simple hedonic experiences are strongly influenced by arbitrary "anchors" (sometimes derived from a person's social security number). Because subsequent valuations are also coherent with respect to salient differences in perceived quality or quantity of these products and experiences, the entire pattern of valuations can easily create an illusion of order, as if it is being generated by stable underlying preferences. The experiments show that this combination of coherent arbitrariness (1) cannot be interpreted as a rational response to information, (2) does not decrease as a result of experience with a good, (3) is not necessarily reduced by market forces, and (4) is not unique to cash prices. The results imply that demand curves estimated from market data need not reveal true consumer preferences, in any normatively significant sense of the term.

[1]  Alvin S. Johnson,et al.  The Sociological Theory of Capital. , 1907 .

[2]  G. Becker,et al.  Irrational Behavior and Economic Theory , 1962, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  H. Ross.  Law, Science, and Accidents: The British Road Safety Act of 1967 , 1973, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[5]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Psychophysics: Introduction to Its Perceptual, Neural and Social Prospects , 1975 .

[6]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty , 1982 .

[7]  A. Sen,et al.  Choice, Welfare and Measurement , 1982 .

[8]  L. Summers.  Does the Stock Market Rationally Reflect Fundamental Values , 1986 .

[9]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives , 1986 .

[10]  Lawrence F. Katz,et al.  Inter-Industry Wage Differences and Theories of Wage Determination , 1987 .

[11]  Alan B. Krueger,et al.  EFFICIENCY WAGES AND THE INTER-INDUSTRY WAGE STRUCTURE , 1988 .

[12]  Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers,et al.  On between-subjects versus within-subjects comparisons in testing utility theory , 1988 .

[13]  R. Thaler.  Interindustry Wage Differentials , 1989 .

[14]  R. Thaler.  Anomalies: Interindustry Wage Differentials , 1989 .

[15]  George Loewenstein,et al.  The Curse of Knowledge in Economic Settings: An Experimental Analysis , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Bias in utility assessments: further evidence and explanations , 1989 .

[17]  L. Sherman.  Police Crackdowns: Initial and Residual Deterrence , 1990, Crime and Justice.

[18]  J. Edward Russo,et al.  Characteristics of Successful Product Information Programs , 1991 .

[19]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion , 1992 .

[20]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction , 1992 .

[21]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Name index , 1993 .

[22]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[23]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  Determinants of stated willingness to pay for public goods: A study in the headline method , 1994, Journal of risk and uncertainty.

[24]  I. Gilboa,et al.  Case-Based Decision Theory , 1995 .

[25]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Measures of Anchoring in Estimation Tasks , 1995 .

[26]  Craig R. Fox,et al.  Ambiguity Aversion and Comparative Ignorance , 1995 .

[27]  David M. Grether,et al.  The preference reversal phenomenon: Response mode, markets and incentives , 1996 .

[28]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Back to Bentham? Explorations of experience utility , 1997 .

[29]  F. Strack,et al.  Explaining the Enigmatic Anchoring Effect: Mechanisms of Selective Accessibility , 1997 .

[30]  T. Bewley.  Why not cut pay , 1998 .

[31]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods , 1998 .

[32]  D. Ariely.  Combining experiences over time: the effects of duration, intensity changes and on‐line measurements on retrospective pain evaluations , 1998 .

[33]  R. Shiller.  Human Behavior and the Efficiency of the Financial System , 1998 .

[34]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  Shared Outrage and Erratic Awards: The Psychology of Punitive Damages , 1998 .

[35]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Scope (in)sensitivity in elicited valuations , 1998 .

[36]  D. Ariely,et al.  Constructing Stable Preferences: A Look Into Dimensions of Experience and Their Impact on Preference Stability , 1999 .

[37]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Anchoring, Activation, and the Construction of Values. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[38]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  Economic Preferences or Attitude Expressions?: An Analysis of Dollar Responses to Public Issues , 1999 .

[39]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Options: A Review and Theoretical Analysis , 1999 .

[40]  D. Ariely,et al.  When does duration matter in judgment and decision making? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[41]  Dan Ariely,et al.  On the making of an experience: the effects of breaking and combining experiences on their overall evaluation , 2000 .

[42]  A. Tversky,et al.  Indifference Curves that Travel with the Choice Set , 2000 .

[43]  Thomas Mussweiler,et al.  Considering The Impossible: Explaining The Effects of Implausible Anchors , 2001 .

[44]  N. Epley,et al.  Putting Adjustment Back in the Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic: Differential Processing of Self-Generated and Experimenter-Provided Anchors , 2001, Psychological science.

[45]  Ivo Welch,et al.  An Economic Approach to the Psychology of Change: Amnesia, Inertia, and Impulsiveness , 2001 .

[46]  T. Bewley.  Knightian decision theory. Part I , 2002 .

[47]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  Predictably Incoherent Judgments , 2002 .

[48]  N. Epley,et al.  Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic. , 2002 .

[49]  Jean Tirole,et al.  Willpower and Personal Rules , 2002, Journal of Political Economy.