Enhancing the role of participatory scenario planning processes: Lessons from Reality Check exercises

Abstract This paper critically assesses a series of scenario planning exercises in the Washington Metropolitan region and the State of Maryland within a broad and evolving framework of participatory planning. Reality Check, as the exercises were called, were a daylong set of activities using tools that encouraged stakeholder participation to develop scenarios focused on long-term regional sustainability. The paper draws upon planning theory, participant reactions, media reports, post-exercise outcomes and author's experiences of shaping the process. It illustrates how the model was adapted to multiple scales and contexts, and variations in desired technical complexity. The paper concludes that such processes have an inherent value in capturing the issues of the future and in creating awareness and knowledge. It argues that certain considerations such as early strategic engagement of stakeholders, flexibility of technical tools and diversity among organizers, all played a role in enhancing the dialogue. Furthermore, it suggests that when timed with favorable external conditions and designed within suitable institutional frameworks, they have the potential to provide a foundation from which tangible regional benefits can be realized.

[1]  Lewis D. Hopkins.  Integrating Knowledge about Land Use and the Environment Through the Use of Multiple Models , 2003 .

[2]  Bruce Tonn,et al.  Engaging the Future: Forecasts, Scenarios, Plans, and Projects , 2008 .

[3]  S. Brody,et al.  Mandating Citizen Participation in Plan Making: Six Strategic Planning Choices , 2003 .

[4]  Richard E. Klosterman,et al.  Arguments for and against planning , 1985 .

[5]  C. Lindblom.  THE SCIENCE OF MUDDLING THROUGH , 1959 .

[6]  J. Thomas,et al.  Planning History and the Black Urban Experience: Linkages and Contemporary Implications , 1994 .

[7]  Michael P. Brooks.  Planning Theory for Practitioners , 2019 .

[8]  Paola Vigano,et al.  The death and life of the great American Cities , 2012 .

[9]  N. Krumholz.  A Retrospective View of Equity Planning Cleveland 1969–1979 , 1982 .

[10]  MARYLAND'S "SMART GROWTH": USING INCENTIVES TO COMBAT SPRAWL. IN: URBAN SPRAWL: CAUSES, CONSEQUENCES AND POLICY RESPONSES , 2002 .

[11]  Qing Shen,et al.  Land-Use Changes in a Pro-Smart-Growth State: Maryland, USA , 2007 .

[12]  M. Burayidi.  Urban Planning in a Multicultural Society , 2000 .

[13]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  Current operational urban land‐use–transport modelling frameworks: A review , 2005 .

[14]  N. Krumholz,et al.  The Cleveland Policy Planning Report , 1975 .

[15]  Willow S. Jacobson,et al.  State Strategic Planning: Suggestions from the Oregon Experience , 1998 .

[16]  Merrelyn Emery.  The power of community search conferences , 2001 .

[17]  Billie T. Alban,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on Large Group Interventions , 2005 .

[18]  吳綱立.  Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design in the Twentieth Century , 2010 .

[19]  A. Carlsson-kanyama,et al.  Participative backcasting: A tool for involving stakeholders in local sustainability planning , 2008 .

[20]  Dowell Myers,et al.  Constructing the Future in Planning: A Survey of Theories and Tools , 2000 .

[21]  Angela Barbanente,et al.  Scenario building for Metropolitan Tunis , 2002 .

[22]  J. Forester.  WHAT DO PLANNING ANALYSTS DO? PLANNING AND POLICY ANALYSIS AS ORGANIZING* , 1980 .

[23]  Gregory D. Squires,et al.  Urban Sprawl: Causes, Consequences, & Policy Responses , 2002 .

[24]  J. Landis.  The California Urban Futures Model: A New Generation of Metropolitan Simulation Models , 1994 .

[25]  L. Sandercock,et al.  Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities , 1997 .

[26]  Richard E. Klosterman,et al.  An Update on Planning Support Systems , 2005 .

[27]  G. Finnveden,et al.  Scenario types and techniques: Towards a user's guide , 2006 .

[28]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[29]  Geraldine Fitzpatrick,et al.  Muddling Through , 1997, Cosmopolitan Conservatisms.

[30]  Thomas J. Chermack,et al.  Improving decision-making with scenario planning , 2004 .

[31]  Scott D. Campbell,et al.  Readings in Planning Theory , 2003 .

[32]  Brian M Deal,et al.  Cyber-physical planning support systems: Advancing participatory decision making in complex urban environments , 2010 .

[33]  B. Santos,et al.  Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre: Toward a Redistributive Democracy , 1998 .

[34]  N. Krumholz.  Equitable Approaches to Local Economic Development , 1999 .

[35]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  An updated scenario typology , 2003 .

[36]  S. Harwood.  Environmental Justice on the Streets , 2003 .

[37]  Alan AtKisson.  Developing indicators of sustainable community: Lessons from sustainable Seattle , 1996 .

[38]  P. Davidoff.  Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning , 1965 .