论文信息 - Revise the ICMJE Recommendations regarding authorship responsibility!

Revise the ICMJE Recommendations regarding authorship responsibility!

Key points A clear set of rules regarding authorship responsibilities in academic publications is much needed. The leading research integrity guidelines on scientific authorship, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Recommendations, are unclear about authorship responsibilities in case of misconduct. The source of the problem is the fourth authorship criterion – it should be revised.

Stefan Eriksson | Gert Helgesson

[1] Anne Hudson Jones. Can authorship policies help prevent scientific misconduct? What role for scientific societies? , 2003, Science and engineering ethics.

[2] Qinghui Zhou,et al. [Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing and publication of scholarly work in medical journals]. , 2014, Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology.

[3] T. Lancet. Authorship and accountability , 2013, The Lancet.

[4] Icmje admin,et al. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly work in Medical Journals , 2017 .

[5] Sören Krach,et al. Journal Impact Factor Shapes Scientists’ Reward Signal in the Prospect of Publication , 2015, PloS one.

[6] S. Eriksson,et al. Responsibility for scientific misconduct in collaborative papers , 2017, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy.

[7] E. Wager,et al. Responsible Research Publication: International Standards for Authors , 2014, Prilozi.