An initial development and validation of a Digital Natives Assessment Scale (DNAS)

The purpose of this study is to address a gap in current research on digital natives by developing the Digital Natives Assessment Scale (DNAS). It is a self-report instrument designed to measure students' perceptions of the degree to which they are digital natives. Using three phases, the Digital Natives Assessment Scale (DNAS) was developed and validated with a total sample of 1018 students from three secondary schools. Results of the principal component and confirmatory factor analyses supported a 21-item, four-factor scale for use by students between 13 and 16 years of age. The four factors are: Grow up with technology, Comfortable with multitasking, Reliant on graphics for communication, Thrive on instant gratifications and rewards. Potential uses and applications of the DNAS by researchers and teachers are discussed. Suggestions for further research are provided. Highlights? This scale can be used to assess the level at which students are considered digital natives. ? The DNAS is a 21-item and short enough to be used in groups. ? The DNAS can used in conjunction with existing measures for teaching and learning purposes.

[1]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[2]  Geoffrey M. Maruyama,et al.  Basics of structural equation modeling , 1997 .

[3]  Martin Ebner,et al.  Is Your University Ready For the Ne(x)t-Generation? , 2009 .

[4]  Diana G. Oblinger,et al.  Educating the Net Generation , 2005 .

[5]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[6]  Hannah Thinyane,et al.  Are digital natives a world-wide phenomenon? An investigation into South African first year students' use and experience with technology , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Richard G. Lomax,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling , 2022 .

[8]  G. A. Marcoulides,et al.  An Introduction to Applied Multivariate Analysis , 2008 .

[9]  R. Eynon,et al.  Digital natives: where is the evidence? , 2010 .

[10]  P. Bentler,et al.  Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification , 1998 .

[11]  R. Kline.  Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 3rd ed. , 2011 .

[12]  Sue Bennett,et al.  Beyond the 'digital natives' debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students' technology experiences , 2010, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[13]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[14]  E. Carmines,et al.  Analyzing models with unobserved variables: analysis of covariance structures , 1981 .

[15]  Fadia Nasser,et al.  On the Use of Factor Analysis as a Research Tool. , 1998 .

[16]  Sue Bennett,et al.  The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[17]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students' use of digital technologies , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[18]  T. Judd,et al.  First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? , 2008 .

[19]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed. , 2009 .

[20]  S. Noar.  The Role of Structural Equation Modeling in Scale Development , 2003 .

[21]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[22]  M. Prensky.  Do They Really Think Differently , 2001 .

[23]  R. Gorsuch.  Common Factor Analysis versus Component Analysis: Some Well and Little Known Facts. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.

[24]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2001 .

[25]  B P O'Connor,et al.  SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[26]  D. Tapscott.  Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation , 1984 .

[27]  Yan Li,et al.  Are 'digital natives' really digitally competent? - A study on Chinese teenagers , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[28]  W. Velicer,et al.  Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. , 1986 .