Effects of Empathy and Conflict Resolution Strategies on Psychophysiological Arousal and Satisfaction in Romantic Relationships

The present research builds upon the extant literature as it assesses psychophysiological factors in relation to empathy, conflict resolution, and romantic relationship satisfaction. In this study, we examined physiological reactivity of individuals in the context of emotionally laden interactions with their romantic partners. Participants (N = 31) completed self-report measures and attended in-person data collection sessions with their romantic partners. Participants were guided through discussions of problems and strengths of their relationships in vivo with their partners while we measured participants’ skin conductance level (SCL) and interbeat interval (IBI) of the heart. We hypothesized that participants’ level of empathy towards their partners would be reflected by physiological arousal (as measured by SCL and IBI) and relationship satisfaction, such that higher levels of empathy would be linked to changes in physiological arousal and higher relationship satisfaction. Further, we hypothesized that differences would be found in physiological arousal (as measured by SCL and IBI) based on the type of conflict resolution strategy used by participants. Finally, we hypothesized that differences would be found in empathy towards partner and relationship satisfaction based on the type of conflict resolution strategies used by participants. Results partially supported hypotheses and were discussed in light of existing knowledge based on empirical and theoretical sources.

[1]  J. Gottman,et al.  Physiological and affective predictors of change in relationship satisfaction. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  C. Segrin,et al.  The Role of Conflict Resolution Styles in Mediating the Relationship Between Enduring Vulnerabilities and Marital Quality , 2009 .

[3]  L. A. Kurdek,et al.  Areas of conflict for gay, lesbian, and heterosexual couples: What couples argue about influences relationship satisfaction. , 1994 .

[4]  Mark H. Davis.  Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. , 1983 .

[5]  R. Croyle,et al.  Dissonance arousal: physiological evidence. , 1983, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Antonio R. Damasio,et al.  The Brain Binds Entities and Events by Multiregional Activation from Convergence Zones , 1989, Neural Computation.

[7]  A. Dinkel,et al.  An Evaluation of the German Relationship Assessment Scale , 2005 .

[8]  M. W. van der Molen,et al.  The cardiac cycle time effect revisited: temporal dynamics of the central-vagal modulation of heart rate in human reaction time tasks. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[9]  C. Heavey,et al.  Gender and conflict structure in marital interaction: a replication and extension. , 1993, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[10]  E. Long.  Measuring Dyadic Perspective-Taking: Two Scales for Assessing Perspective-Taking in Marriage and Similar Dyads , 1990 .

[11]  T. Bradbury,et al.  Understanding and Altering the Longitudinal Course of Marriage , 2004 .

[12]  P. Lang,et al.  International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Instruction Manual and Affective Ratings (Tech. Rep. No. A-4) , 1999 .

[13]  N. Jacobson,et al.  Integrative behavioral couple therapy: an acceptance-based, promising new treatment for couple discord. , 2000, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[14]  Susan S. Hendrick,et al.  The Relationship Assessment Scale , 1998 .

[15]  M. Lafontaine,et al.  Measuring Empathy in Couples: Validity and Reliability of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index for Couples , 2010, Journal of personality assessment.

[16]  S. Steinhauer,et al.  Respiratory sinus arrhythmia as an index of emotional response in young adults. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[17]  Barry A. Freeman.  The social neuroscience of empathy in the theatre of global ethics , 2012 .

[18]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Inferring psychological significance from physiological signals. , 1990, The American psychologist.

[19]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The metrics of cardiac chronotropism: biometric perspectives. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[20]  J. Allen,et al.  Reading others emotions: The role of intuitive judgments in predicting marital satisfaction, quality, and stability. , 2004, Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association.

[21]  M. Baier,et al.  Reliability and validity of the relationship assessment scale , 1999 .

[22]  Timothy W. Smith,et al.  Cardiovascular Reactivity During Positive and Negative Marital Interactions , 2007, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[23]  D. Gilbert,et al.  Factors characterizing marital conflict states and traits: physiological, affective, behavioral and neurotic variable contributions to marital conflict and satisfaction , 1998 .

[24]  W. Boucsein.  Electrodermal activity, 2nd ed. , 2012 .

[25]  Julian F. Thayer,et al.  Matters of the variable heart: respiratory sinus arrhythmia response to marital interaction and associations with marital quality. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  David C. Atkins,et al.  Traditional versus integrative behavioral couple therapy for significantly and chronically distressed married couples. , 2004, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[27]  J. Andreassi.  Psychophysiology: Human Behavior and Physiological Response , 1980 .