A Computational Prototype of Industrial District

Nonwoven fabrics characterized by a superior balance of strength and softness are formed utilizing an aqueous emulsion prepared by the emulsion polymerization of: 30 to 50% by weight of vinyl ester of an alkanoic acid; 10 to 30% by weight ethylene; 30 to 50% by weight of C4-C8 alkyl acrylate; and 1 to 5% by weight of copolymerizable N-methylol containing monomer; wherein the polymerization is performed using batch or semi-batch techniques.

[1]  David A. Lane,et al.  Complexity and Local Interactions: Towards a Theory of Industrial Districts , 2002 .

[2]  Francesco Lissoni,et al.  Knowledge codification and the geography of innovation: the case of Brescia mechanical cluster , 2001 .

[3]  Udo H. Staber.  The Structure of Networks in Industrial Districts , 2001 .

[4]  Thomas Brenner,et al.  Simulating the Evolution of Localised Industrial Clusters - An Identification of the Basic Mechanisms , 2001, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[5]  Udo Staber,et al.  Spatial Proximity and Firm Survival in a Declining Industrial District: The Case of Knitwear Firms in Baden-Wu¨rttemberg , 2001 .

[6]  Nicole Woolsey Biggart,et al.  Collateralized Social Relations: The Social in Economic Calculation , 2001 .

[7]  Guido Fioretti,et al.  Information Structure and Behaviour of a Textile Industrial District , 2001, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[8]  Josh Whitford,et al.  The decline of a model? Challenge and response in the Italian industrial districts , 2001 .

[9]  Pietro Terna,et al.  Creating Artificial Worlds: A Note on Sugarscape and Two Comments , 2001, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[10]  Francesco Luna,et al.  Economic simulations in swarm: Agent - based modelling and object , 2000 .

[11]  G. Tunzelmann.  Technology generation, technology use and economic growth , 2000 .

[12]  M van Dijk,et al.  Technological Regimes and Industrial Dynamics: The Evidence from Dutch Manufacturing , 2000 .

[13]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier , 2000 .

[14]  P. Cooke,et al.  The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions, and Innovation , 2000 .

[15]  Pietro Terna,et al.  How to build and use agent-based models in social science , 2000 .

[16]  G. Dosi.  Innovation, Organization and Economic Dynamics , 2000 .

[17]  G. Dosi.  Innovation, organization and economic dynamics : selected essays , 2000 .

[18]  Giorgio Gottardi,et al.  Evolutionary patterns of local industrial systems : towards a cognitive approach to the industrial district , 2000 .

[19]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  Economic growth and technological change : an evolutionary interpretation , 2010 .

[20]  Robert L. Axtell,et al.  WHY AGENTS? ON THE VARIED MOTIVATIONS FOR AGENT COMPUTING IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES , 2000 .

[21]  Önder Nomaler,et al.  Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics Technological Diffusion Patterns and Their Effects on Industrial Dynamics Technological Diffusion Patterns and Their Effects on Industrial Dynamics , 2022 .

[22]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  The firms that feed industrial districts: A return to the Italian source , 1999 .

[23]  Gérard Ballot,et al.  Technological change, learning and macro-economic coordination: An evolutionary model , 1999, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[24]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Innovation, Learning and Industrial Organisation , 1999 .

[25]  V. Albino,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER AND INTER-FIRM RELATIONSHIPS IN INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS : THE ROLE OF THE LEADER FIRM , 1998 .

[26]  Pietro Terna.  Simulation tools for social scientists: Building agent-based models with SWARM , 1998, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[27]  R. Axelrod.  Reviews book & software , 2022 .

[28]  Marc Willinger,et al.  Alternative methodologies for modelling evolutionary dynamics: Introduction , 1997 .

[29]  B. Carlsson,et al.  MICRO-MACRO SIMULATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL SYSTEMS: ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF SPILLOVERS , 1997 .

[30]  J. Casti.  Would-Be Worlds: How Simulation Is Changing the Frontiers of Science , 1996 .

[31]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up , 1996 .

[32]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[33]  J. Caccomo.  Technological evolution and economic instability: Theoretical simulations , 1996 .

[34]  L. Ferrucci,et al.  The evolutionary nature of the firm within industrial districts , 1996 .

[35]  F. Belussi.  Local systems, industrial districts and institutional networks: Towards a new evolutionary paradigm of industrial economics? , 1996 .

[36]  C. Badcock,et al.  Simulating Societies: The Computer Simulation of Social Phenomena , 1995 .

[37]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy , 1996 .

[38]  G. Dosi,et al.  An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics , 1994 .

[39]  Gabi Dei Ottati,et al.  Cooperation and competition in the industrial district as an organization model , 1994 .

[40]  David A. Lane.  Artificial worlds and economics, part II , 1993 .

[41]  M. Willinger,et al.  Efficience, irréversibilités et constitution des technologies , 1993 .

[42]  Gunnar Eliasson,et al.  Modeling the experimentally organized economy: Complex dynamics in an empirical micro-macro model of endogenous economic growth , 1991 .

[43]  D. North.  Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[44]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[45]  W. Arthur,et al.  The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II , 1988 .

[46]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.