Transient memory impairment in monkeys with bilateral lesions of the entorhinal cortex

Performance on five behavioral tasks was assessed post-operatively in Macaca fascicularis monkeys prepared with bilateral lesions of the entorhinal cortex (E group). Three of the tasks were also readministered 9–14 months after surgery. Initial learning of the delayed nonmatching-to-sample (DNMS) task was impaired in the E animals relative to unoperated control monkeys. On the delay portion of DNMS, the performance of E animals was nearly at control levels at short delays (up to 60 sec) but was impaired at 10 min and 40 min retention intervals. On the retest of DNMS, the E animals performed normally at all retention intervals. The E animals were unimpaired on the four other memory tasks. Neuroanatomical studies revealed a significant transverse expansion of the terminal field of the perirhinal cortical projection in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. Compared to unlesioned, anatomical control monkeys, the transverse length of the perirhinal terminal field in CA1 increased approximately 70% in the E monkeys. Although this was a striking morphological alteration, it is not known whether the sprouting of this projection influenced the behavioral recovery. The results of these studies suggest that the entorhinal cortex may normally participate in the learning and performance of tasks that are dependent on the medial temporal lobe memory system. However, recovery of normal DNMS performance demonstrates that the entorhinal cortex is not, by itself, essential for learning and performance of such tasks.

[1]  H. Harlow,et al.  A test-apparatus for monkeys , 1938 .

[2]  W. Scoville,et al.  LOSS OF RECENT MEMORY AFTER BILATERAL HIPPOCAMPAL LESIONS , 1957, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[3]  B. Milner,et al.  Disorders of learning and memory after temporal lobe lesions in man. , 1972, Clinical neurosurgery.

[4]  D. Pandya,et al.  Some connections of the entorhinal (area 28) and perirhinal (area 35) cortices of the rhesus monkey. I. Temporal lobe afferents , 1975, Brain Research.

[5]  Deepak N. Pandya,et al.  Some connections of the entorhinal (area 28) and perirhinal (area 35) cortices of the rhesus monkey. II. Frontal lobe afferents , 1975, Brain Research.

[6]  M. Mishkin Memory in monkeys severely impaired by combined but not by separate removal of amygdala and hippocampus , 1978, Nature.

[7]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Two‐dimensional maps of the cerebral cortex , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  W M Cowan,et al.  Subcortical afferents to the hippocampal formation in the monkey , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[9]  G. V. Hoesen,et al.  A direct projection from the perirhinal cortex (area 35) to the subiculum in the rat , 1983, Brain Research.

[10]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Severe tactual as well as visual memory deficits follow combined removal of the amygdala and hippocampus in monkeys , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  L. Squire,et al.  Preserved learning in monkeys with medial temporal lesions: sparing of motor and cognitive skills , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  W. Cowan,et al.  A stereotaxic atlas of the brain of the cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis) , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  Blood Pressure Values in Macaca fascicularis , 1984, Journal of medical primatology.

[14]  L. Squire,et al.  Medial temporal lesions in monkeys impair memory on a variety of tasks sensitive to human amnesia. , 1985, Behavioral neuroscience.

[15]  L. Squire,et al.  Human amnesia and the medial temporal region: enduring memory impairment following a bilateral lesion limited to field CA1 of the hippocampus , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  D. Amaral,et al.  The entorhinal cortex of the monkey: II. Cortical afferents , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[17]  D. Amaral,et al.  The entorhinal cortex of the monkey: III. Subcortical afferents , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[18]  D. Amaral,et al.  The entorhinal cortex of the monkey: I. Cytoarchitectonic organization , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[19]  L. Squire,et al.  Lesions of the amygdala that spare adjacent cortical regions do not impair memory or exacerbate the impairment following lesions of the hippocampal formation , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  D. Amaral,et al.  Lesions of perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex that spare the amygdala and hippocampal formation produce severe memory impairment , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[21]  D. Amaral,et al.  Topographical organization of the entorhinal projection to the dentate gyrus of the monkey , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  M. Victor,et al.  Amnesia due to Lesions Confined to the Hippocampus: A Clinical-Pathologic Study , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  D. Amaral,et al.  Cortical inputs to the CA1 field of the monkey hippocampus originate from the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex but not from area TE , 1990, Neuroscience Letters.

[24]  D. Amaral,et al.  Entorhinal cortex of the monkey: V. Projections to the dentate gyrus, hippocampus, and subicular complex , 1991, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[25]  Larry R. Squire,et al.  Stereotaxic lesions of the hippocampus in monkeys: determination of surgical coordinates and analysis of lesions using magnetic resonance imaging , 1991, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[26]  L. Squire,et al.  The medial temporal lobe memory system , 1991, Science.

[27]  L. Squire,et al.  Enduring memory impairment in monkeys after ischemic damage to the hippocampus , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[28]  E. Murray Medial temporal lobe structures contributing to recognition memory: The amygdaloid complex versus the rhinal cortex. , 1992 .

[29]  E. Lauterbach The Amygdala: Neurobiological Aspects of Emotion, Memory, and Mental Dysfunction , 1993 .

[30]  L. Squire,et al.  Neuroanatomy of memory. , 1993, Annual review of neuroscience.

[31]  D. Amaral,et al.  Lesions of the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices in the monkey produce long-lasting memory impairment in the visual and tactual modalities , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[32]  L. Squire,et al.  Damage to the perirhinal cortex exacerbates memory impairment following lesions to the hippocampal formation , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[33]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Effects on visual recognition of combined and separate ablations of the entorhinal and perirhinal cortex in rhesus monkeys , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[34]  Seth J. Ramus,et al.  Severity of memory impairment in monkeys as a function of locus and extent of damage within the medial temporal lobe memory system , 1994, Hippocampus.

[35]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Stimulus recognition , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[36]  W. Suzuki,et al.  Topographic organization of the reciprocal connections between the monkey entorhinal cortex and the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[37]  P Alvarez,et al.  Damage limited to the hippocampal region produces long-lasting memory impairment in monkeys , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[38]  L. Squire Human amnesia , 1995, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.