Immune neglect in affective forecasting.

Abstract Research on emotional prediction, or affective forecasting, shows that people regularly overestimate the emotional intensity of events. Particularly for negative events, people fail to consider how coping resources will ameliorate negative affect, a phenomenon termed immune neglect. In an affective forecasting study of nine football games, participants ( n  = 180) overestimated emotional reactions to wins and losses, and an experimental manipulation helped reduce bias. Further, those reporting greater use of emotional processing coping strategies recovered more effectively from losses, but failed to foresee this when making predictions, leading to increased bias. This is the first study to document individual differences in immune neglect. Results support the generalizability of biased predictions and contribute to the understanding of affective forecasting and coping.

[1]  Michael Hoerger,et al.  Racial bias in personality assessment: using the MMPI-2 to predict psychiatric diagnoses of African American and Caucasian chemical dependency inpatients. , 2009, Psychological assessment.

[2]  B. Mellers Choice and the relative pleasure of consequences. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  N. Bolger,et al.  A framework for studying personality in the stress process. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Affective Forecasting , 2005 .

[5]  Michael Hoerger,et al.  Affective forecasting and the Big Five. , 2010, Personality and individual differences.

[6]  Janine E. Janosky,et al.  Methodological Framework for Single Subject Designs , 2009 .

[7]  Michael Hoerger,et al.  Effects of situational demand upon social enjoyment and preference in schizotypy. , 2007, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[8]  Janine E. Janosky,et al.  Application of the Single Subject Design in Biomedicine , 2009 .

[9]  J. Persons,et al.  Cognitive Therapy in Practice: A Case Formulation Approach , 1989 .

[10]  A. Stanton,et al.  Emotionally expressive coping predicts psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancer. , 2000, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[11]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Immune neglect: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  T. Wilson Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious , 2002 .

[13]  Michael Hoerger,et al.  When does haste make waste? Speed-accuracy tradeoff, skill level, and the tools of the trade. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[14]  A. Stanton,et al.  Coping through emotional approach: a new look at emotion, coping, and health-related outcomes. , 2004, Journal of personality.

[15]  J. Bentham An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation , 1945, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[16]  A. Stanton,et al.  Coping through emotional approach: problems of conceptualization and confounding. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  D. Gilbert,et al.  Focalism: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Economics and Psychology. , 1963 .

[19]  Michael Hoerger,et al.  Participant Dropout as a Function of Survey Length in Internet-Mediated University Studies: Implications for Study Design and Voluntary Participation in Psychological Research , 2010, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[20]  Richard E. Lucas,et al.  Cognitive determinants of affective forecasting errors. , 2010, Judgment and decision making.

[21]  J. Moskowitz,et al.  Coping: pitfalls and promise. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[22]  Janine E. Janosky,et al.  Ethics and Single Subject Research , 2009 .

[23]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Loss Aversion Is an Affective Forecasting Error , 2006, Psychological science.

[24]  C. Carver,et al.  Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.