Comparative performance analysis of European airports by means of extended data envelopment analysis

This discussion paper led to an article in the Journal of Advanced Transportation (2014). Volume 48, issue 3, pages 185-202. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has become an established approach for analyzing and comparing efficiency results of corporate organizations or economic agents. It has also found wide application in comparative studies on airport efficiency. The standard DEA approach to comparative airport efficiency analysis has two feeble elements, viz. a methodological and a substantive weakness. The methodological weakness originates from the choice of uniform efficiency improvement assessment, while the substantive weakness in airport efficiency analysis concerns the insufficient attention for short-term and long-term adjustment possibilities in the production inputs determining airport efficiency. The present paper aims to address both flaws by: (i) designing a data-instigated Distance Friction Minimization (DFM) model as a generalization of the standard Banker-Charnes-Cooper (BCC) model with a view to the development of a more appropriate efficiency improvement projection model in the BCC version of DEA; (ii) including as factor inputs also lumpy or rigid factors that are characterized by short-term indivisibility or inertia (and hence not suitable for short-run flexible adjustment in new efficiency stages), as is the case for runways of airports. This so-called fixed factor (FF) case will be included in the DFM submodel of DEA. This extended DEA – with a DFM and an FF component – will be applied to a comparative performance analysis of several major airports in Europe. Finally, our comparative study on airport efficiency analysis will be extended by incorporating also the added value of the presence of shopping facilities at airports for their relative economic performance.

[1]  Non-aviation revenues and their implications for airport regulation , 2011 .

[2]  L. Tang,et al.  Operational efficiencies across Asia Pacific airports , 2009 .

[3]  C. Barros Airports in Argentina: Technical efficiency in the context of an economic crisis , 2008 .

[4]  Y. V. Hui,et al.  Productivity Changes in Chinese Airports 1995-2004 , 2008 .

[5]  C. Barros,et al.  Performance evaluation of Italian airports: A data envelopment analysis , 2007 .

[6]  Concepción Román,et al.  A Benchmarking Analysis of Spanish Commercial Airports. A Comparison Between SMOP and DEA Ranking Methods , 2006 .

[7]  Anne Graham,et al.  Airport benchmarking: a review of the current situation , 2005 .

[8]  Y. Yoshida,et al.  JAPANESE-AIRPORT BENCHMARKING WITH THE DEA AND ENDOGENOUS-WEIGHT TFP METHODS: TESTING THE CRITICISM OF OVERINVESTMENT IN JAPANESE REGIONAL AIRPORTS , 2004 .

[9]  Paul Freathy,et al.  The commercialisation of European airports: successful strategies in a decade of turbulence? , 2004 .

[10]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Inefficiencies and scale economies of European airport operations , 2003 .

[11]  B. Vasigh,et al.  SIZE VERSUS EFFICIENCY: A CASE STUDY OF US COMMERCIAL AIRPORTS , 2003 .

[12]  Nicole Adler,et al.  Measuring airport quality from the airlines' viewpoint: an application of data envelopment analysis , 2001 .

[13]  Juan Carlos Martín,et al.  An application of DEA to measure the efficiency of Spanish airports prior to privatization , 2001 .

[14]  Joseph Sarkis An analysis of the operational efficiency of major airports in the United States , 2000 .

[15]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Relative efficiency of European airports , 1999 .

[16]  David Gillen,et al.  DEVELOPING MEASURES OF AIRPORT PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE: AN APPLICATION OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 1997 .

[17]  Boaz Golany,et al.  An Interactive MOLP Procedure for the Extension of DEA to Effectiveness Analysis , 1988 .

[18]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Efficiency Analysis for Exogenously Fixed Inputs and Outputs , 1986, Oper. Res..

[19]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .