Effectiveness of the football helmet assessed by finite element modeling and impact testing

Mini-sled impact tests using a Hybrid III head-neck complex with and without a helmet were conducted to contrast resulting head accelerations. Because this experimental configuration includes both the linear and rotational impacts to the head, it represents the real world football impact condition better than drop tests traditionally used to evaluate the protective effect of a helmet. It was found that wearing a helmet significantly attenuates head linear acceleration but not angular acceleration. Additionally, a 3-D finite element model of a football helmet simulating all of its essential components was developed and validated to investigate its effectiveness in energy attenuation. Results from these modeling and experimental efforts have shown that the helmet was less effective in attenuating impact energy due to an impact to the front-boss and side of the helmet. The validated helmet model can be used in conjunction with a validated human head model to design helmets intelligently by determining optimal liner thickness and stiffness for omnidirectional protection of the head, once an acceptable injury criterion is established. In addition, the helmeted head model can be used as an inexpensive adjunct for current test procedures and for the establishment of new procedures.

[1]  A Gilchrist,et al.  DEFORMATION ANALYSIS FOR MOTORCYCLE HELMETS , 1993 .

[2]  Thomas A. Gennarelli,et al.  Directional Dependence of Axonal Brain Injury due to Centroidal and Non-Centroidal Acceleration , 1987 .

[3]  L Zhang,et al.  Recent advances in brain injury research: a new human head model development and validation. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[4]  A. King,et al.  Comparison of brain responses between frontal and lateral impacts by finite element modeling. , 2001, Journal of neurotrauma.

[5]  H. Mertz,et al.  HEAD INJURY RISK ASSESSMENT FOR FOREHEAD IMPACTS , 1996 .

[6]  J. Wilberger,et al.  Minor Head Injuries in American Football , 1993, Sports medicine.

[7]  Robert C Cantu,et al.  Athletic head injury , 2003, Current sports medicine reports.

[8]  King H. Yang,et al.  FINITE ELEMENT MODELING OF HYBRID III HEAD-NECK COMPLEX , 1992 .

[9]  A. L. Yettram,et al.  Materials for motorcycle crash helmets - a finite element parametric study , 1994 .

[10]  S. Margulies,et al.  A proposed tolerance criterion for diffuse axonal injury in man. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  J. Wismans,et al.  MADYMO 3D Simulations of Hybrid III Dummy Sled Tests , 1988 .

[12]  Tawfik B. Khalil,et al.  The Role of Impact Location in Reversible Cerebral Concussion , 1983 .

[13]  David C. Viano,et al.  A new biomechanical predictor for mild traumatic brain injury: a preliminary finding , 2003 .

[14]  Christine M. Branche,et al.  The Epidemiology of Sports-Related Traumatic Brain Injuries in the United States: Recent Developments , 1998, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[15]  Ints Kaleps,et al.  Hybrid III Geometrical and Inertial Properties , 1988 .

[16]  Y C Deng,et al.  Anthropomorphic dummy neck modeling and injury considerations. , 1989, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  William H. Muzzy,et al.  Comparison of Human and Hybrid III Head and Neck Dynamic Response , 1986 .