Technological learning and renewable energy costs: implications for US renewable energy policy

Abstract This paper analyzes the relationship between current renewable energy technology costs and cumulative production, research, development and demonstration expenditures, and other institutional influences. Combining the theoretical framework of ‘learning by doing’ and developments in ‘learning by searching’ with the fields of organizational learning and institutional economics offers a complete methodological framework to examine the underlying capital cost trajectory when developing electricity cost estimates used in energy policy planning models. Sensitivities of the learning rates for global wind and solar photovoltaic technologies to changes in the model parameters are tested. The implications of the results indicate that institutional policy instruments play an important role for these technologies to achieve cost reductions and further market adoption.

[1]  G. Masters,et al.  Exploiting Wind Versus Coal , 2001, Science.

[2]  Gunnar Myrdal.  An American Dilemma , 1944 .

[3]  Ronald H. Coase,et al.  The New Institutional Economics , 1998 .

[4]  Tirso Leonardo Barreto Gómez,et al.  Technological Learning in Energy Optimisation Models and Deployment of Emerging Technologies , 2001 .

[5]  John F. Muth,et al.  Search Theory and the Manufacturing Progress Function , 1986 .

[6]  Chihiro Watanabe,et al.  Industrial dynamism and the creation of a “virtuous cycle” between R&D, market growth and price reduction: The case of photovoltaic power generation (PV) development in Japan , 2000 .

[7]  Robert F. Bordley,et al.  R&D and Global Manufacturing Performance , 1998 .

[8]  John P. Holdren,et al.  THE PCAST ENERGY STUDIES: Toward a National Consensus on Energy Research, Development, Demonstration, and Deployment Policy , 2001 .

[9]  J. Horner.  The Role of Technology: An Institutionalist Debate , 1989 .

[10]  Paul D. Maycock,et al.  Business analysis of solar photovoltaic energy conversion , 1975 .

[11]  Roderick E. White,et al.  An Organizational Learning Framework : From Intuition to Institution Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[12]  Warren J. Samuels,et al.  The present state of institutional economics , 1995 .

[13]  Lena Neij,et al.  Use of experience curves to analyse the prospects for diffusion and adoption of renewable energy technology , 1997 .

[14]  T. P. Wright,et al.  Factors affecting the cost of airplanes , 1936 .

[15]  Hung-po Chao,et al.  Analyzing California's Power Crisis , 2001 .

[16]  M. Sonis.  Innovation Diffusion through Schumpeterian Competition , 1992 .

[17]  C. Harmon,et al.  Experience Curves of Photovoltaic Technology , 2000 .

[18]  A Lewis,et al.  The Role of Technology , 2005, Literacy and Augmentative and Alternative Communication.

[19]  S. Rajagopalan,et al.  A learning curve model with knowledge depreciation , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  von Tunzelmann,et al.  Technology and Industrial Progress , 1995 .

[21]  Jon D. Erickson,et al.  RESIDENTIAL RURAL SOLAR ELECTRICITY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES , 1995 .

[22]  L. Argote.  Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge , 1999 .

[23]  C. Wene.  Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy , 2000 .

[24]  Institutional Rigidities and Economic Growth , 1989 .

[25]  Lena Christiansson,et al.  Diffusion and Learning Curves of Renewable Energy Technologies , 1995 .

[26]  Lena Neij,et al.  Cost dynamics of wind power , 1999 .

[27]  Search Theory and the Manufacturing Progress Function , 1986 .

[28]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Global energy : perspectives , 1998 .

[29]  Zenon Rajewski.  Gross domestic product , 1994 .

[30]  Itzhak Venezia.  On the statistical origins of the learning curve , 1985 .

[31]  Christopher French Hilary Brown Lester R. Flavin.  State of the world 2000 , 2000 .

[32]  Asami Miketa,et al.  The impact of R&D on innovation for wind energy in Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom , 2005 .

[33]  Esben Sloth Andersen,et al.  National Innovation Systems and the Dynamics of the Division of Labour , 1997 .

[34]  D. Kammen,et al.  Underinvestment: the energy technology and R&D policy challenge , 1999, Science.

[35]  Joel Darmstadter,et al.  Winner, Loser, or Innocent Victim? Has Renewable Energy Performed As Expected? , 2000 .

[36]  James M. Gee,et al.  History of the Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cell Research Program at Sandia National Laboratories , 2001 .

[37]  E. Demeo,et al.  Renewable Energy Technology Characterizations , 1997 .

[38]  R. Lucas.  On the Mechanics of Economic Development , 1988 .

[39]  W. Arthur,et al.  The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II , 1988 .

[40]  Antonio Soria,et al.  Modelling energy technology dynamics: methodology for adaptive expectations models with learning by doing and learning by searching , 2000 .

[41]  Chihiro Watanabe,et al.  Identification of the role of renewable energy. A view from Japan's challenge: the New Sunshine Program , 1995 .

[42]  S. Newell,et al.  The Role of Networks In the Diffusion of Technological Innovation , 1996 .

[43]  T. F. Ciszek,et al.  The crystalline-silicon photovoltaic R&D project at NREL and SNL , 1996 .

[44]  G. P. Corey,et al.  PV batteries and charge controllers: technical issues, costs, and market trends , 1997, Conference Record of the Twenty Sixth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 1997.

[45]  Peter Holmes Kobos.  The implications of renewable energy research and development: Policy scenario analysis with experience and learning effects , 2002 .

[46]  G. Myrdal,et al.  Against the Stream: Critical Essays on Economics , 1973 .

[47]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Learning rates for energy technologies , 2001 .

[48]  C. E. Witt.  Status and Recent Progress in Photovoltaic Manufacturing in the USA , 2001 .

[49]  Daniel M. Kammen,et al.  Evidence of under-investment in energy R&D in the United States and the impact of Federal policy , 1999 .

[50]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Experiments with a Methodology to Model the Role of R&D Expenditures in Energy Technology Learning Process , 2004 .

[51]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Targeting technological progress towards sustainable development , 2001 .

[52]  William Kamery,et al.  Electricity Generation Cost Simulation Model (GenSim) , 2002 .

[53]  C. Edquist,et al.  Institutions and Organizations in Systems of Innovation , 2013 .

[54]  Chihiro Watanabe,et al.  Global Technology Spillover and its Impact on Industry's R&D Strategies , 2001 .

[55]  D. North.  Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[56]  L. Lynn,et al.  The Institutional Domain of Technology Diffusion , 1991 .

[57]  Stephen Bernow,et al.  Analysis of Wind Turbine Cost Reductions: the Role of Research and Development and Cumulative Production Technological Learning Conventional Learning Theory Factors of Cost Reduction and Innovation Box 1 General Learning Curve Model , 1999 .

[58]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Co-evolution of Industry Structure, Technology and Supporting Institutions, and the Making of Comparative Advantage , 1995 .

[59]  W. Zangwill,et al.  Toward a Theory of Continuous Improvement and the Learning Curve , 1998 .

[60]  Chihiro Watanabe,et al.  Systems option for sustainable development—effect and limit of the Ministry of International Trade and Industry's efforts to substitute technology for energy , 1999 .

[61]  D. Weil,et al.  A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth Author ( s ) : , 2008 .

[62]  Mitigating global warming by substituting technology for energy: MITI's efforts and new approach , 1995 .

[63]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Experiments with a methodology to model the role of RD first results , 2004 .