Clinical outcomes after 24 months of insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes in five countries: results from the TREAT study

Abstract Objective: To assess factors associated with insulin regimens at initiation, changes in treatment and metabolic control over 2 years of insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes in five countries. Research design and methods: TREAT was a prospective, 24 month, observational study in patients with type 2 diabetes initiating insulin in clinical practice. Patient characteristics were collected at baseline and metabolic outcomes at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after initiation. Results: A total of 985 patients were enrolled, 886 assessed at baseline and 734 (82.8%) at 24 months. Baseline characteristics varied between countries: 52.8% of patients were men; mean age was 60.4 years; body mass index, 29.7 kg/m2; time since diagnosis, 10.1 years; HbA1c, 9.6%. Less than 25% of patients met ADA/IDF targets for blood pressure/LDL cholesterol. Overall, 50.1% of patients were initiated on long/intermediate insulin, 39.3% on mixture and 7.8% on basal–bolus; distribution varied between countries. Patients on long/intermediate were more likely to have lower baseline HbA1c and be intensified to other regimens (19.4%). No oral antidiabetic medication was used for 16.4% initiating on long/intermediate, 47.4% on mixture and 62.3% with basal–bolus. Overall, mean HbA1c decreased from 9.6% to 7.6%, with little difference between regimens at endpoint. The percentage of patients with hypoglycaemia was highest at 6 months and with basal–bolus. Limitations: Sites were not selected at random. Drop-out of patients prior to 24 months may have introduced a bias that favoured responders. Conclusions: Mean baseline HbA1c was high, indicating delayed initiation of insulin treatment. Blood pressure and lipids were suboptimally controlled. Insulin regimens varied between countries, changed little and resulted in similar HbA1c levels after 24 months.

[1]  S. Inzucchi,et al.  Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach. Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 2012;35:1364–1379 , 2013, Diabetes Care.

[2]  S. Inzucchi,et al.  Erratum to: Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach. Position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) , 2013, Diabetologia.

[3]  A. Goday,et al.  Increase in direct diabetes-related costs and resource use in the 6 months following initiation of insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes in five European countries: data from the INSTIGATE study , 2012, ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR.

[4]  A. Goday,et al.  Clinical Outcomes After Insulin Initiation in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: 24-Month Results from INSTIGATE , 2012, Diabetes Therapy.

[5]  T. Iványi,et al.  Optimization of insulin therapy in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: beyond basal insulin , 2012, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[6]  E. Gale Post-marketing studies of new insulins: sales or science? , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  D. Matthews,et al.  Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Patient-Centered Approach , 2012, Diabetes Care.

[8]  G. Nichols,et al.  Glycemic Response and Attainment of A1C Goals Following Newly Initiated Insulin Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes , 2012, Diabetes Care.

[9]  V. Basevi,et al.  Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2012 , 2011, Diabetes Care.

[10]  D. Giugliano,et al.  Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors and HbA1c target of <7% in type 2 diabetes: meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2011, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[11]  D. Giugliano,et al.  Multiple HbA1c targets and insulin analogues in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. , 2011, Journal of diabetes and its complications.

[12]  A. Goday,et al.  Clinical outcomes after insulin initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes: 6-month data from the INSTIGATE observational study in five European countries , 2011, Current medical research and opinion.

[13]  M. Landin-Olsson,et al.  [HbA1c--new standardization introduced in Sweden. The new unit is mmol/mol]. , 2010, Lakartidningen.

[14]  S. Jain,et al.  Prandial–basal insulin regimens plus oral antihyperglycaemic agents to improve mealtime glycaemia: initiate and progressively advance insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes , 2010, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[15]  A. Farmer,et al.  Three-year efficacy of complex insulin regimens in type 2 diabetes. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  S. Kalra,et al.  Baseline characteristics of the Indian cohort from the IMPROVE™ study: a multinational, observational study of biphasic insulin aspart 30 treatment for type 2 diabetes , 2009, Advances in therapy.

[17]  W. Hsu Consequences of Delaying Progression to Optimal Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Not Achieving Glycemic Goals , 2009, Southern medical journal.

[18]  A. Goday,et al.  Characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus initiating insulin therapy: baseline data from the INSTIGATE study. , 2009, Current medical research and opinion.

[19]  A. Dornhorst,et al.  Once-daily insulin detemir in a cohort of insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes: a sub-analysis from the PREDICTIVE study. , 2009, Current medical research and opinion.

[20]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Nine-year trends in achievement of risk factor goals in the US and European outpatients with cardiovascular disease. , 2008, American heart journal.

[21]  S. Gough,et al.  Delayed initiation of subcutaneous insulin therapy after failure of oral glucose‐lowering agents in patients with Type 2 diabetes: a population‐based analysis in the UK , 2007, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[22]  A. Farmer,et al.  Addition of biphasic, prandial, or basal insulin to oral therapy in type 2 diabetes. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  P. Nilsson,et al.  Antihyperglycaemic treatment of type 2 diabetes: results from a national diabetes register. , 2007, Diabetes & metabolism.

[24]  G. Nichols,et al.  Delay Of Insulin Addition To Oral Combination Therapy Despite Inadequate Glycemic Control , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[25]  Achieving Glycemic Goals in Type 2 Diabetes , 2007, Diabetes Care.

[26]  N. Charuruks,et al.  Determination of reference intervals of HbA1C (DCCT/NGSP) and HbA1C (IFCC) in adults. , 2005, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[27]  Richard M Hoffman,et al.  Intensified blood glucose monitoring improves glycemic control in stable, insulin-treated veterans with type 2 diabetes: the Diabetes Outcomes in Veterans Study (DOVES). , 2003, Diabetes care.

[28]  B. Jönsson,et al.  Revealing the cost of Type II diabetes in Europe , 2002, Diabetologia.

[29]  B. Jönsson Revealing the cost of Type II diabetes in Europe. , 2002, Diabetologia.

[30]  C. Cockram,et al.  Comparison of Insulin With or Without Continuation of Oral Hypoglycemic Agents in the Treatment of Secondary Failure in NIDDM Patients , 1995, Diabetes Care.

[31]  Joel C. Trexler,et al.  Nontraditional Regression Analyses , 1993 .