Effect of backrest height on wheelchair propulsion biomechanics for level and uphill conditions.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of backrest height on wheelchair propulsion kinematics and kinetics. DESIGN An intervention study with repeated measures. SETTING University laboratory. PARTICIPANTS Convenience sample included manual wheelchair users (N=36; 26 men and 10 women) with spinal cord injuries ranging from T8 to L2. INTERVENTION Participants propelled on a motor-driven treadmill for 2 conditions (level and slope of 3°) at a constant speed of 0.9 m/s while using in turn a sling backrest fixed at 40.6 cm (16 in) high (high backrest) and a lower height set at 50% trunk length (low backrest). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Cadence, stroke angle, peak shoulder extension angle, shoulder flexion/extension range of motion, and mechanical effective force. RESULTS Pushing with the low backrest height enabled greater range of shoulder motion (P<.01), increased stroke angle (P<.01), push time (P<.01), and reduced cadence (P=.01) regardless of whether the treadmill was level or sloped. CONCLUSIONS A lower cadence can be achieved when pushing with a lower backrest, which decreases the risk of developing upper-limb overuse related injuries. However, postural support, comfort, and other activities of daily living must also be considered when selecting a backrest height for active, long-term wheelchair users. The improvements found when using the low backrest were found regardless of slope type. Pushing uphill demanded significantly higher resultant and tangential force, torque, mechanical effective force, and cadence.

[1]  Kenton R Kaufman,et al.  The effect of seat position on wheelchair propulsion biomechanics. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[2]  Rory A. Cooper Wheelchair Selection and Configuration , 1998 .

[3]  S. D. Shimada,et al.  Wheelchair pushrim kinetics: body weight and median nerve function. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  R H Rozendal,et al.  Seat height in handrim wheelchair propulsion. , 1989, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  Kenton R Kaufman,et al.  The effect of visual biofeedback on the propulsion effectiveness of experienced wheelchair users. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  M Lamontagne,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of wheelchair propulsion for various seating positions. , 1992, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[7]  Les G Carlton,et al.  Kinematic and electromyographic analysis of wheelchair propulsion on ramps of different slopes for young men with paraplegia. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  H. Saraste,et al.  Clinical evaluation of seating in persons with complete thoracic spinal cord injury , 2003, Spinal Cord.

[9]  Rachid Aissaoui,et al.  Effect of system tilt and seat-to-backrest angles on load sustained by shoulder during wheelchair propulsion. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[10]  M. Hsu,et al.  Remote monitoring of sitting behaviors for community-dwelling manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury , 2009, Spinal Cord.

[11]  Jacquelin Perry,et al.  Effect of Fore-Aft Seat Position on Shoulder Demands During Wheelchair Propulsion:Part2. An Electromyographic Analysis , 2005, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[12]  D. Theisen,et al.  Wheelchair Propulsion Biomechanics , 2001, Sports medicine.

[13]  Philip Requejo,et al.  Effect of Fore-Aft Seat Position on Shoulder Demands During Wheelchair Propulsion: Part 1. A Kinetic Analysis , 2005, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[14]  Randall L. Braddom Physical medicine and rehabilitation , 2013 .

[15]  S. D. Shimada,et al.  Glenohumeral joint kinematics and kinetics for three coordinate system representations during wheelchair propulsion. , 1999, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[16]  R A Cooper,et al.  Methods for determining three-dimensional wheelchair pushrim forces and moments: a technical note. , 1997, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[17]  R A Cooper,et al.  Manual wheelchair pushrim biomechanics and axle position. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  Rachid Aissaoui,et al.  Biomechanics of Manual Wheelchair Propulsion in Elderly: System Tilt and Back Recline Angles , 2002, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[19]  Aaron L. Souza,et al.  Propulsion patterns and pushrim biomechanics in manual wheelchair propulsion. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  Michele Harms Effect of Wheelchair Design on Posture and Comfort of Users , 1990 .

[21]  J. Collinger,et al.  Shoulder biomechanics during the push phase of wheelchair propulsion: a multisite study of persons with paraplegia. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  R.A. Cooper,et al.  SMART/sup Wheels/: development and testing of a system for measuring manual wheelchair propulsion dynamics , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  Aaron L. Souza,et al.  Shoulder kinematics and kinetics during two speeds of wheelchair propulsion. , 2002, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[24]  R Aissaoui,et al.  Evaluation of the new flexible contour backrest for wheelchairs. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[25]  W Mark Richter,et al.  Stroke pattern and handrim biomechanics for level and uphill wheelchair propulsion at self-selected speeds. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[26]  L H V van der Woude,et al.  Mechanical efficiency and propulsion technique after 7 weeks of low-intensity wheelchair training. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[27]  S. D. Shimada,et al.  Three-dimensional pushrim forces during two speeds of wheelchair propulsion. , 1997, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[28]  Alicia M Koontz,et al.  Manual wheelchair propulsion patterns on natural surfaces during start-up propulsion. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.