Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Implementation: How the Amended Law Has Failed to Protect Vulnerable Populations from Toxic Chemicals in the United States

Exposures to industrial chemicals are widespread and can increase the risk of adverse health effects such as cancer, developmental disorders, respiratory effects, diabetes, and reproductive problems. The amended Toxic Substances Control Act (amended TSCA) requires the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to evaluate risks of chemicals in commerce, account for risk to potentially exposed and susceptible populations, and mitigate risks for chemicals determined to pose an unreasonable risk to human health and the environment. This analysis compares EPA’s first 10 chemical risk evaluations under amended TSCA to best scientific practices for conducting risk assessments. We find EPA’s risk evaluations underestimated human health risks of chemical exposures by excluding conditions of use and exposure pathways; not considering aggregate exposure and cumulative risk; not identifying all potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulations, and not quantifying differences in risk for susceptible groups; not addressing data gaps; and using flawed systematic review approaches to identify and evaluate the relevant evidence. We present specific recommendations for improving the implementation of amended TSCA using the best available science to ensure equitable, socially just safeguards to public health. Failing to remedy these shortcomings will result in continued systematic underestimation of risk for all chemicals evaluated under amended TSCA.

[1]  W. Wagner,et al.  Legal obstacles to toxic chemical research. , 2022, Science.

[2]  R. M. Shaffer,et al.  Environmental Health Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: A Visual Overview and a Renewed Call for Coordination. , 2021, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  David J. Lennett,et al.  A Cumulative Framework for Identifying Overburdened Populations under the Toxic Substances Control Act: Formaldehyde Case Study , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[4]  J. Apte,et al.  PM2.5 polluters disproportionately and systemically affect people of color in the United States , 2021, Science Advances.

[5]  M. Cabana,et al.  Exposure to formaldehyde and asthma outcomes: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and economic assessment , 2021, PloS one.

[6]  Jill A. Franzosa,et al.  FutureTox IV Workshop Summary: Predictive Toxicology for Healthy Children. , 2021, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[7]  J. Higgins,et al.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[8]  O. Jolliet,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of racial disparities in chemical biomarker concentrations in United States women, 1999-2014 , 2019, bioRxiv.

[9]  T. Woodruff,et al.  Population susceptibility: A vital consideration in chemical risk evaluation under the Lautenberg Toxic Substances Control Act , 2019, PLoS biology.

[10]  M. Hyman,et al.  1,4-Dioxane in drinking water: emerging for 40 years and still unregulated , 2019, Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health.

[11]  C. Elferink,et al.  Building and Maintaining a Citizen Science Network With Fishermen and Fishing Communities Post Deepwater Horizon Oil Disaster Using a CBPR Approach , 2018, New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS.

[12]  A. Camper,et al.  Community Engaged Cumulative Risk Assessment of Exposure to Inorganic Well Water Contaminants, Crow Reservation, Montana , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[13]  S. Krimsky The unsteady state and inertia of chemical regulation under the US Toxic Substances Control Act , 2017, PLoS biology.

[14]  T. Woodruff,et al.  Environmental Chemicals in an Urban Population of Pregnant Women and Their Newborns from San Francisco. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  T. Woodruff,et al.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Multiple Airborne Pollutants and Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2016, PloS one.

[16]  Dylan S. Atchley,et al.  Application of the Navigation Guide systematic review methodology to the evidence for developmental and reproductive toxicity of triclosan. , 2016, Environment international.

[17]  Dylan S. Atchley,et al.  Fetal growth and maternal glomerular filtration rate: a systematic review , 2015, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[18]  Mark S. DeFrancesco,et al.  International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics opinion on reproductive health impacts of exposure to toxic environmental chemicals , 2015, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[19]  Bruce G. Link,et al.  Is Racism a Fundamental Cause of Inequalities in Health , 2015 .

[20]  Ellen K Silbergeld,et al.  Regulating chemicals: law, science, and the unbearable burdens of regulation. , 2015, Annual review of public health.

[21]  Susceptibility Based Upon Chemical Interaction with Disease Processes: Potential Implications for Risk Assessment , 2014, Current Environmental Health Reports.

[22]  Tracey J. Woodruff,et al.  The Navigation Guide—Evidence-Based Medicine Meets Environmental Health: Systematic Review of Human Evidence for PFOA Effects on Fetal Growth , 2014, Environmental health perspectives.

[23]  Paula I. Johnson,et al.  The Navigation Guide—Evidence-Based Medicine Meets Environmental Health: Integration of Animal and Human Evidence for PFOA Effects on Fetal Growth , 2014, Environmental health perspectives.

[24]  Paula I. Johnson,et al.  The Navigation Guide—Evidence-Based Medicine Meets Environmental Health: Systematic Review of Nonhuman Evidence for PFOA Effects on Fetal Growth , 2014, Environmental health perspectives.

[25]  Tracey J. Woodruff,et al.  The Navigation Guide Systematic Review Methodology: A Rigorous and Transparent Method for Translating Environmental Health Science into Better Health Outcomes , 2014, Environmental health perspectives.

[26]  Elizabeth Hoover Cultural and health implications of fish advisories in a Native American community , 2013, Ecological Processes.

[27]  G. Ginsberg Cadmium Risk Assessment in Relation to Background Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease , 2012, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[28]  T. Woodruff,et al.  The need for better public health decisions on chemicals released into our environment. , 2011, Health affairs.

[29]  M. Jerrett,et al.  Understanding the cumulative impacts of inequalities in environmental health: implications for policy. , 2011, Health affairs.

[30]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[31]  T. Woodruff,et al.  Environmental Chemicals in Pregnant Women in the United States: NHANES 2003–2004 , 2011, Environmental health perspectives.

[32]  Bruce G. Link,et al.  Social Conditions as Fundamental Causes of Health Inequalities: Theory, Evidence, and Policy Implications , 2010, Journal of health and social behavior.

[33]  Michael P. Wilson,et al.  Toward a New U.S. Chemicals Policy: Rebuilding the Foundation to Advance New Science, Green Chemistry, and Environmental Health , 2009, Environmental health perspectives.

[34]  S. Pocock,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[35]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  An observational study found that authors of randomized controlled trials frequently use concealment of randomization and blinding, despite the failure to report these methods. , 2004, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[36]  B. Djulbegovic,et al.  Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[37]  M. Egger,et al.  The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. , 1999, JAMA.

[38]  Bruce G. Link,et al.  Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. , 1995, Journal of health and social behavior.

[39]  E Crouch,et al.  Tautology or not tautology? , 1987, Journal of toxicology and environmental health.

[40]  Edmund A. C. Crouch,et al.  A Possible Relationship Between Toxicity and Carcinogenicity , 1986 .

[41]  M. Pike,et al.  A carcinogenic potency database of the standardized results of animal bioassays , 1984, Environmental health perspectives.

[42]  Richard Wilson,et al.  Use of Acute Toxicity to Estimate Carcinogenic Risk , 1984 .