Vascular Health and Risk Management Dovepress Effects on Cardiovascular Disease Risk of a Web-based Health Risk Assessment with Tailored Health Advice: a Follow-up Study

Introduction: A large proportion of the cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden can potentially be prevented by primary prevention programs addressing major causal risk factors. A Web-based health risk assessment (HRA) with tailored feedback for individual health promotion is a promising strategy. We evaluated the effect on CVD risk of such a program among employees of a Dutch worksite. Methods: We conducted a prospective follow-up study among 368 employees who voluntarily participated in a Web-based HRA program at a single Dutch worksite in 2008. The program included a multicomponent HRA through a Web-based electronic questionnaire, biometrics, and laboratory evaluation. The results were combined with health behavior change theory to generate tailored motivational and educational health advice. On request, a health counseling session with the program physician was available. Follow-up data on CVD risk were collected 1 year after initial participation. The primary outcome was a change in Framingham CVD risk at 6 months relative to baseline. We checked for a possible background effect of an increased health consciousness as a consequence of program introduction at the worksite by comparing baseline measurements of early program participants with baseline measurements of participants who completed the program 6 months later. Results: A total of 176 employees completed follow-up measurements after a mean of 7 months. There was a graded relation between CVD risk changes and baseline risk, with a relative reduction of 17.9% (P = 0.001) in the high-risk category (baseline CVD risk $20%). Changes were not explained by additional health counseling, medication, or an increase in health consciousness within the company. Conclusions: Voluntary participation in a Web-based HRA with tailored feedback at the worksite reduced CVD risk by nearly 18% among participants at high CVD risk and by nearly 5% among all participants. Web-based HRA could improve CVD risk in similar populations. Future research should focus on the persistence of the effects underlying the CVD risk reduction.

[1]  Robin E. Soler,et al.  A systematic review of selected interventions for worksite health promotion. The assessment of health risks with feedback. , 2010, American journal of preventive medicine.

[2]  Gregory R Wagner,et al.  Worksite Wellness Programs for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association , 2009, Circulation.

[3]  L. Appel,et al.  Lifestyle Interventions Reduce Coronary Heart Disease Risk: Results From the PREMIER Trial , 2009, Circulation.

[4]  Hugo C van Woerden,et al.  Healthy Hearts – A community-based primary prevention programme to reduce coronary heart disease , 2008, BMC cardiovascular disorders.

[5]  Ronald J Ozminkowski,et al.  The health and cost benefits of work site health-promotion programs. , 2008, Annual review of public health.

[6]  M. Pencina,et al.  General Cardiovascular Risk Profile for Use in Primary Care: The Framingham Heart Study , 2008, Circulation.

[7]  J. Singer,et al.  One-year follow-up of a therapeutic lifestyle intervention targeting cardiovascular disease risk , 2007, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[8]  Ian Graham European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary. , 2007 .

[9]  S. Noar,et al.  Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  L Suzanne Suggs,et al.  Application of a Web-Based Tailored Health Risk Assessment in a Work-Site Population , 2007, Health promotion practice.

[11]  C. Mendivil,et al.  Reduction of global cardiovascular risk with nutritional versus nutritional plus physical activity intervention in Colombian adults , 2006, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[12]  D. Ellsworth,et al.  Intensive lifestyle modification: impact on cardiovascular disease risk factors in subjects with and without clinical cardiovascular disease. , 2004, Preventive cardiology.

[13]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study , 2004, The Lancet.

[14]  D. Yach,et al.  The global burden of chronic diseases: overcoming impediments to prevention and control. , 2004, JAMA.

[15]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[16]  S. Ziebland,et al.  Effects of fruit and vegetable consumption on plasma antioxidant concentrations and blood pressure: a randomised controlled trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[17]  A. Cooper,et al.  What is the magnitude of blood pressure response to a programme of moderate intensity exercise? Randomised controlled trial among sedentary adults with unmedicated hypertension. , 2000, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[18]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. , 2000 .

[19]  V. Strecher,et al.  One size does not fit all: The case for tailoring print materials , 1999, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[20]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  Lowering blood pressure: a systematic review of sustained effects of non-pharmacological interventions. , 1998, Journal of public health medicine.

[21]  W. Velicer,et al.  The Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior Change , 1997, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[22]  R Z Goetzel,et al.  A Review of Health-Related Outcomes of Multi-Component Worksite Health Promotion Programs , 1997, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[23]  D. Anderson,et al.  The Impact of Worksite-Based Health Risk Appraisal on Health-Related Outcomes: A Review of the Literature , 1996, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[24]  Y. Lerman,et al.  Epidemiologic characteristics of participants and nonparticipants in health-promotion programs. , 1996, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[25]  V. Strecher,et al.  Do tailored behavior change messages enhance the effectiveness of health risk appraisal? Results from a randomized trial. , 1996, Health education research.

[26]  A. Burdorf,et al.  International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity Determinants of Participation in Worksite Health Promotion Programmes: a Systematic Review , 2009 .

[27]  Shah Ebrahim,et al.  European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary. , 2007, Atherosclerosis.

[28]  G. Bray,et al.  Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research Group. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease. , 2000, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[30]  J M Simpson,et al.  Who comes to a workplace health risk assessment? , 1998, International journal of behavioral medicine.

[31]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1977 .