Cell-Type Dependent Effect of Surface-Patterned Microdot Arrays on Neuronal Growth

Surface micropatterns have been widely used as chemical cues to control the microenvironment of cultured neurons, particularly for neurobiological assays and neurochip designs. However, the cell-type dependency on the interactions between neurons and underlying micropatterns has been rarely investigated despite the inherent differences in the morphology of neuronal types. In this study, we used surface-printed microdot arrays to investigate the effect of the same micropatterns on the growth of mouse spinal interneuron, mouse hippocampal neurons, and rat hippocampal neurons. While mouse hippocampal neurons showed no significantly different growth on control and patterned substrates, we found the microdot arrays had different effects on early neuronal growth depending on the cell type; spinal interneurons tended to grow faster in length, whereas hippocampal neurons tended to form more axon collateral branches in response to the microdot arrays. Although there was a similar trend in the neurite length and branch number of both neurons changed across the microdot arrays with the expanded range of size and spacing, the dominant responses of each neuron, neurite elongation of mouse spinal interneurons and branching augmentation of rat hippocampal neurons were still preserved. Therefore, our results demonstrate that the same design of micropatterns could cause different neuronal growth results, raising an intriguing issue of considering cell types in neural interface designs.

[1]  Yoonkey Nam,et al.  Material considerations for in vitro neural interface technology , 2012 .

[2]  Boris Hofmann,et al.  Axon guidance of rat cortical neurons by microcontact printed gradients. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[3]  W. Tsai,et al.  Fabrication of tunable micropatterned substrates for cell patterning via microcontact printing of polydopamine with poly(ethylene imine)-grafted copolymers. , 2012, Acta biomaterialia.

[4]  Jun Ma,et al.  Development of an artificial neuronal network with post-mitotic rat fetal hippocampal cells by polyethylenimine. , 2008, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[5]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[6]  Martin Bastmeyer,et al.  Growth cone navigation in substrate-bound ephrin gradients , 2006, Development.

[7]  Christelle Breillat,et al.  Micropatterned substrates coated with neuronal adhesion molecules for high-content study of synapse formation , 2013, Nature Communications.

[8]  Woong Sun,et al.  Synaptic compartmentalization by micropatterned masking of a surface adhesive cue in cultured neurons. , 2016, Biomaterials.

[9]  M. Cecchini,et al.  Neuronal differentiation on anisotropic substrates and the influence of nanotopographical noise on neurite contact guidance. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[10]  Utku Horzum,et al.  Differentiation of Normal and Cancer Cell Adhesion on Custom Designed Protein Nanopatterns. , 2015, Nano letters.

[11]  L. Weiss,et al.  Cell adhesion. , 1978, International dental journal.

[12]  M. Théry,et al.  Micropatterning as a tool to decipher cell morphogenesis and functions , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[13]  Orit Shefi,et al.  Topographic cues of nano‐scale height direct neuronal growth pattern , 2012, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[14]  Manuel Théry,et al.  Cell adhesion geometry regulates non-random DNA segregation and asymmetric cell fates in mouse skeletal muscle stem cells. , 2014, Cell reports.

[15]  X. Jiang,et al.  Versatile multiple protein nanopatterning within a microfluidic channel for cell recruitment studies. , 2015, Lab on a chip.

[16]  S. Kaech,et al.  Culturing hippocampal neurons , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[17]  Woong Sun,et al.  Surface-printed microdot array chips for the quantification of axonal collateral branching of a single neuron in vitro. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[18]  K. Poole,et al.  Laminin-332 coordinates mechanotransduction and growth cone bifurcation in sensory neurons , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  J. Y. Lim,et al.  Micropatterning-retinoic acid co-control of neuronal cell morphology and neurite outgrowth. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[20]  J. Enghild,et al.  Combinatorial Biomolecular Nanopatterning for High‐Throughput Screening of Stem‐Cell Behavior , 2016, Advanced materials.

[21]  Martin Bastmeyer,et al.  Cell behaviour on micropatterned substrata: limits of extracellular matrix geometry for spreading and adhesion , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[22]  Utku Horzum,et al.  Micrometer scale spacings between fibronectin nanodots regulate cell morphology and focal adhesions , 2014 .

[23]  Yoonkey Nam,et al.  Geometric effect of cell adhesive polygonal micropatterns on neuritogenesis and axon guidance , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[24]  Justin C. Williams,et al.  Adhesive micro-line periodicity determines guidance of axonal outgrowth. , 2013, Lab on a chip.