Effects of particle shape and size on devolatilization of biomass particle

Abstract Experimental and theoretical investigations indicate particle shape and size influence biomass particle dynamics, including drying, heating rate, and reaction rate. Experimental samples include disc/flake-like, cylindrical/cylinder-like, and equant (nearly spherical) shapes of wood particles with similar particle masses and volumes but different surface areas. Small samples (320 μm) passed through a laboratory entrained-flow reactor in a nitrogen atmosphere and a maximum reactor wall temperature of 1600 K. Large samples were suspended in the center of a single-particle reactor. Experimental data indicate that equant particles react more slowly than the other shapes, with the difference becoming more significant as particle mass or aspect ratio increases and reaching a factor of two or more for particles with sizes over 10 mm. A one-dimensional, time-dependent particle model simulates the rapid pyrolysis process of particles with different shapes. The model characterizes particles in three basic shapes (sphere, cylinder, and flat plate). With the particle geometric information (particle aspect ratio, volume, and surface area) included, this model simulates the devolatilization process of biomass particles of any shape. Model simulations of the three shapes show satisfactory agreement with the experimental data. Model predictions show that both particle shape and size affect the product yield distribution. Near-spherical particles exhibit lower volatile and higher tar yields relative to aspherical particles with the same mass under similar conditions. Volatile yields decrease with increasing particle size for particles of all shapes. Assuming spherical or isothermal conditions for biomass particles leads to large errors at most biomass particle sizes of practical interest.

[1]  Alexander L. Brown,et al.  A Study of Cellulose Pyrolysis Chemistry and Global Kinetics at High Heating Rates , 2001 .

[2]  D. Fletcher,et al.  A CFD based combustion model of an entrained flow biomass gasifier , 2000 .

[3]  A. Robinson,et al.  Effects of Intraparticle Heat and Mass Transfer on Biomass Devolatilization: Experimental Results and Model Predictions , 2004 .

[4]  Michael Jerry Antal,et al.  Kinetics of the Thermal Decomposition of Cellulose, Hemicellulose, and Sugar Cane Bagasse , 1989 .

[5]  Alexander L. Brown,et al.  Design and characterization of an entrained flow reactor for the study of biomass pyrolysis chemistry at high heating rates , 2001 .

[6]  Colomba Di Blasi,et al.  Heat, momentum and mass transport through a shrinking biomass particle exposed to thermal radiation , 1996 .

[7]  F. Berruti,et al.  A KINETIC MODEL FOR THE PRODUCTION OF LIQUIDS FROM THE FLASH PYROLYSIS OF BIOMASS , 1988 .

[8]  D. Gera,et al.  MOISTURE AND CHAR REACTIVITY MODELING IN PULVERIZED COAL COMBUSTORS , 2001 .

[9]  B. Babu,et al.  Modeling, simulation and estimation of optimum parameters in pyrolysis of biomass , 2003 .

[10]  B. B. Krieger,et al.  Modelling and experimental verification of physical and chemical processes during pyrolysis of a large biomass particle , 1985 .

[11]  Peter R. Solomon,et al.  Progress in coal pyrolysis , 1993 .

[12]  F. Thurner,et al.  Kinetic investigation of wood pyrolysis , 1981 .

[13]  M. Antal,et al.  Cellulose Pyrolysis Kinetics: The Current State of Knowledge , 1995 .

[14]  Stephen Niksa,et al.  Predicting the rapid devolatilization of diverse forms of biomass with bio-flashchain , 2000 .

[15]  Robert F. Chaiken,et al.  Charring pyrolysis of wood in fires by laser simulation , 1977 .

[16]  S. Patankar Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow , 2018, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.

[17]  A. Lua,et al.  Kinetic Study on Pyrolysis of Extracted Oil Palm Fiber. Isothermal and non-isothermal conditions , 2000 .

[18]  J. J. Saastamoinen,et al.  Simplified model for calculation of devolatilization in fluidized beds , 2006 .

[19]  Vadim N. Kurdyumov,et al.  Heat Transfer From a Circular Cylinder at Low Reynolds Numbers , 1998 .

[20]  J. Masliyah,et al.  NUMERICAL SOLUTION OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER FROM SPHEROIDS IN STEADY AXISYMMETRIC FLOW , 1972 .

[21]  Morten Grønli,et al.  Mathematical Model for Wood PyrolysisComparison of Experimental Measurements with Model Predictions , 2000 .

[22]  V. K. Srivastava,et al.  Studies on pyrolysis of a single biomass cylindrical pellet—kinetic and heat transfer effects , 1999 .

[23]  A. Abad,et al.  Modeling of the devolatilization of nonspherical wet pine wood particles in fluidized beds , 2002 .

[24]  M. Antal,et al.  Cellulose Pyrolysis Kinetics: Revisited , 1998 .

[25]  N. Papayannakos,et al.  Modelling of the pyrolysis of biomass particles. Studies on kinetics, thermal and heat transfer effects , 1991 .

[26]  C. Blasi Influences of physical properties on biomass devolatilization characteristics , 1997 .

[27]  J. Bellan,et al.  A Generalized Biomass Pyrolysis Model Based on Superimposed Cellulose, Hemicelluloseand Liqnin Kinetics , 1997 .

[28]  P. Horbaj Model of the kinetics of biomass pyrolysis. , 1997 .

[29]  Colomba Di Blasi,et al.  Analysis of Convection and Secondary Reaction Effects Within Porous Solid Fuels Undergoing Pyrolysis , 1993 .

[30]  W. Prins,et al.  Flash pyrolysis kinetics of pine wood , 1993 .

[31]  Edward J. Kansa,et al.  Mathematical model of wood pyrolysis including internal forced convection , 1977 .

[32]  T. Liliedahl,et al.  Heat transfer controlled pyrolysis kinetics of a biomass slab, rod or sphere , 1998 .

[33]  K. Khilar,et al.  Influence of mineral matter on biomass pyrolysis characteristics , 1995 .

[34]  C. Di Blasi,et al.  Kinetic and Heat Transfer Control in the Slow and Flash Pyrolysis of Solids , 1996 .

[35]  Michael A. Serio,et al.  Modeling of biomass pyrolysis kinetics , 1998 .

[36]  Alan R. Kerstein,et al.  Chemical percolation model for devolatilization. 3. Direct use of carbon-13 NMR data to predict effects of coal type , 1992 .

[37]  Colomba Di Blasi,et al.  Comparison of semi-global mechanisms for primary pyrolysis of lignocellulosic fuels , 1998 .

[38]  W. Prins,et al.  Modelling of flash pyrolysis of a single wood particle. , 2000 .

[39]  Rafael Font,et al.  Kinetics of the pyrolysis of almond shells and almond shells impregnated with cobalt dichloride in a fluidized bed reactor and in a pyroprobe 100 , 1990 .

[40]  H. Lu Experimental and Modeling Investigations of Biomass Particle Combustion , 2006 .

[41]  David Merrick,et al.  Mathematical models of the thermal decomposition of coal: 2. Specific heats and heats of reaction , 1983 .

[42]  B. Peters,et al.  Drying and pyrolysis of wood particles: experiments and simulation , 2003 .

[43]  William A. Peters,et al.  Product compositions and kinetics in the rapid pyrolysis of sweet gum hardwood , 1985 .

[44]  G. J. Morris,et al.  Kinetic studies of rapid oil shale pyrolysis , 1991 .

[45]  Henrik Thunman,et al.  Combustion of wood particles—a particle model for eulerian calculations , 2002 .

[46]  C. Blasi Numerical simulation of cellulose pyrolysis , 1994 .

[47]  A. Robinson,et al.  Experimental Measurements of the Thermal Conductivity of Ash Deposits: Part 2. Effects of Sintering and Deposit Microstructure , 2000 .

[48]  Kenneth M. Bryden,et al.  Modeling the impact of shrinkage on the pyrolysis of dry biomass , 2002 .

[49]  E. Pohlhausen,et al.  Der Wärmeaustausch zwischen festen Körpern und Flüssigkeiten mit kleiner reibung und kleiner Wärmeleitung , 1921 .