Visual thresholds for wavelet quantization error

The discrete wavelet transform (DWT) decomposes an image into bands that vary in spatial frequency and orientation. It is widely used for image compression. Measures of the visibility of DWT quantization errors are required to achieve optimal compression. Uniform quantization of a single band of coefficients results in an artifact that is the sum of a lattice of random amplitude basis functions of the corresponding DWT synthesis filter, which we call DWT uniform quantization noise. We measured visual detection thresholds for samples of DWT uniform quantization noise in Y, Cb, and Cr color channels. The spatial frequency of a wavelet is r 2-L, where r is display visual resolution in pixels/degree, and L is the wavelet level. Amplitude thresholds increase rapidly with spatial frequency. Thresholds also increase from Y to Cr to Cb, and with orientation from low-pass to horizontal/vertical to diagonal. We propose a mathematical model for DWT noise detection thresholds that is a function of level, orientation, and display visual resolution. This allows calculation of a 'perceptually lossless' quantization matrix for which all errors are in theory below the visual threshold. The model may also be used as the basis for adaptive quantization schemes.

[1]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  J. Robson,et al.  Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field , 1981, Vision Research.

[3]  Benjamin Belzer,et al.  Wavelet filter evaluation for image compression , 1995, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[4]  J. M. Shapiro An embedded wavelet hierarchical image coder , 1992, [Proceedings] ICASSP-92: 1992 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[5]  Michel Barlaud,et al.  Image coding using wavelet transform , 1992, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[6]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Multifrequency channel decompositions of images and wavelet models , 1989, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[7]  A. Watson Probability summation over time , 1979, Vision Research.

[8]  Albert J. Ahumada,et al.  Improved detection model for DCT coefficient quantization , 1993, Electronic Imaging.

[9]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  Visibility of DCT basis functions: effects of display resolution , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE Data Compression Conference (DCC'94).

[10]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  DCT quantization matrices visually optimized for individual images , 1993, Electronic Imaging.