Conversational Expectations as a Basis for Order Effects in Persuasion

The current study demonstrates the role of conversational processes in order effects in persuasive communications. Conversational rules guide individuals' expectations about the position of the most important arguments within a persuasive message. We argue that these expectations contribute to the influence of arguments on attitude change, that is, if the important arguments are expected at a certain position, they become more influential than the other arguments of the persuasive message. In the current study, we presented participants with a persuasive message in which the order of arguments was experimentally manipulated. An order effect occurred when the conversational expectation regarding the order of arguments was applicable. However, no reliable order effect was observed when the conversational expectation was discredited. Importantly, consistent with the explanation of conversational order effects, the interactive effects of argument order and conversational expectation on the attitude was mediated by the perceived importance of the arguments.

[1]  C. Neil Macrae,et al.  Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox. , 1994 .

[2]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[3]  William D. Crano,et al.  Primacy versus Recency in Retention of Information and Opinion Change , 1977 .

[4]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[5]  Carol Harding.  COGNITION AND COMMUNICATION: JUDGMENTAL BIASES, RESEARCH METHODS, AND THE LOGIC OF CONVERSATION. Norbert Schwarz. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. Pp. vii + 112. $22.50 paper. , 1998 .

[6]  F. H. Knower.  Experimental studies of changes in attitude. II. A study of the effect of printed argument on changes in attitude. , 1936 .

[7]  N. Anderson.  A Functional Theory of Cognition , 1996 .

[8]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Judgment in a Social Context: Biases, Shortcomings, and the Logic of Conversation , 1994 .

[10]  C. I. Hovland.  The Order Of Presentation In Persuasion , 1966 .

[11]  S. Asch.  Forming impressions of personality. , 1946, Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

[12]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Making sense of standardized survey questions: The influence of reference periods and their repetition , 2002 .

[13]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. , 1989 .

[14]  A. A. Lumsdaine.  Communication and persuasion , 1954 .

[15]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  On Leaping to Conclusions When Feeling Tired: Mental Fatigue Effects on Impressional Primacy , 1996 .

[16]  Mike Allen,et al.  Meta‐analysis comparing the persuasiveness of one‐sided and two‐sided messages , 1991 .

[17]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .

[18]  Herbert Bless,et al.  Inferring the importance of arguments: Order effects and conversational rules , 2003 .

[19]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. , 1998 .

[20]  Curtis P. Haugtvedt,et al.  Message Order Effects in Persuasion: An Attitude Strength Perspective , 1994 .

[21]  N. Anderson.  Foundations of information integration theory , 1981 .

[22]  M. Sherif,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1946, Psychological review.

[23]  D. K. Berlo,et al.  Effect of intercellular and intracellular speech structure on attitude change and learning , 1956 .

[24]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Harvey Cromwell,et al.  The Relative Effect on Audience Attitude of the First Versus the Second Argumentative Speech of a Series , 1950 .

[26]  Harold Sponberg.  A study of the relative effectiveness of climax and anti‐climax order in an argumentative speech∗ , 1946 .

[27]  H. H. Clark,et al.  What's new? Acquiring New information as a process in comprehension , 1974 .

[28]  J. Thibaut,et al.  Order of Presentation at Trial , 1972 .

[29]  Robert C. Jackson,et al.  Testing a model of message sidedness: Three replications , 1990 .

[30]  Additional Thoughts on Conversational and Motivational Sources of the Dilution Effect , 2007 .

[31]  H. Bless,et al.  The Conversational Basis for the Dilution Effect , 2005 .

[32]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Conversational conventions, order of information acquisition, and the effect of base rates and individuating information on social judgments. , 1990 .

[33]  N. Anderson,et al.  Effect of stimulus inconsistency and discounting instructions in personality impression formation. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Siobhan Chapman.  Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[35]  Wyer,et al.  Effects of information inconsistency and grammatical context on evaluation of persons , 1973 .

[36]  Norman H. Anderson,et al.  Effects of concomitant verbal recall on order effects in personality impression formation , 1963 .

[37]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Is the Interdependent Self More Sensitive to Question Context Than the Independent Self? Self-Construal and the Observation of Conversational Norms☆ , 2002 .