The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Sources of Individual Differences in the Speed of Naming Objects and Actions: the Contribution of Executive Control
暂无分享,去创建一个
A. Roelofs | A. Meyer | Z. Shao | Zeshu Shao | Ardi Roelofs
[1] A. Roelofs,et al. Attention, spatial integration, and the tail of response time distributions in Stroop task performance , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[2] A. Roelofs,et al. Attention Demands of Spoken Word Planning: A Review , 2011, Front. Psychology.
[3] Herbert Schriefers,et al. Semantic interference in immediate and delayed naming and reading: Attention and task decisions , 2011 .
[4] Frank Oppermann,et al. Is there semantic interference in delayed naming? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[5] F. Ferreira,et al. The role of inhibition in the production of disfluencies , 2010, Memory & cognition.
[6] Chi-Shing Tse,et al. Effects of healthy aging and early stage dementia of the Alzheimer's type on components of response time distributions in three attention tasks. , 2010, Neuropsychology.
[7] Beula M. Magimairaj,et al. Working memory and specific language impairment: an update on the relation and perspectives on assessment and treatment. , 2010, American journal of speech-language pathology.
[8] E. Bialystok,et al. Effect of language proficiency and executive control on verbal fluency performance in bilinguals , 2010, Cognition.
[9] A. Rodríguez-Fornells,et al. Individual differences in control of language interference in late bilinguals are mainly related to general executive abilities , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Functions.
[10] Xiaolin Zhou,et al. Executive control in language processing , 2009, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
[11] Elizabeth S. Nilsen,et al. The relations between children’s communicative perspective-taking and executive functioning , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.
[12] Ardi Roelofs,et al. Attention, Gaze Shifting, and Dual-task Interference from Phonological Encoding in Spoken Word Planning Background to the Present Study , 2022 .
[13] Antje S Meyer,et al. Capacity demands of phoneme selection in word production: new evidence from dual-task experiments. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[14] Frederick Verbruggen,et al. STOP-IT: Windows executable software for the stop-signal paradigm , 2008, Behavior research methods.
[15] Ardi Roelofs,et al. Dynamics of the attentional control of word retrieval: analyses of response time distributions. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[16] Ardi Roelofs,et al. Attention to Spoken Word Planning: Chronometric and Neuroimaging Evidence , 2008, Lang. Linguistics Compass.
[17] Klaus Oberauer,et al. Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[18] Juan Pascual-Leone,et al. Processing limitations in children with specific language impairment: the role of executive function. , 2006, Child development.
[19] A. Miyake,et al. Not All Executive Functions Are Related to Intelligence , 2006, Psychological science.
[20] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Timed Action and Object Naming , 2005, Cortex.
[21] Michael F. Bunting,et al. Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[22] R. Poldrack,et al. Dissociable Controlled Retrieval and Generalized Selection Mechanisms in Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex , 2005, Neuron.
[23] Judith F. Kroll,et al. The roles of study-abroad experience and working-memory capacity in the types of errors made during translation , 2004, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.
[24] M. J. Emerson,et al. Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals: the effects of cue type and articulatory suppression in the random task cuing paradigm. , 2004, Acta psychologica.
[25] A. Heathcote,et al. QMLE: Fast, robust, and efficient estimation of distribution functions based on quantiles , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[26] H. Pashler,et al. Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[27] Albert Postma,et al. Limitations in processing resources and speech monitoring , 2002 .
[28] J Druks,et al. An Object and Action Naming Battery , 2000 .
[29] M. J. Emerson,et al. The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.
[30] Irene P. Kan,et al. Verb generation in patients with focal frontal lesions: a neuropsychological test of neuroimaging findings. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[31] G. Dell,et al. Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. , 1997, Psychological review.
[32] S. Lupker,et al. Strategic Control in a Naming Task: Changing Routes or Changing Deadlines? , 1997 .
[33] N. Meiran. Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. , 1996 .
[34] Willem J. M. Levelt,et al. A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[35] Frances C. Grafton,et al. Correlations among Cognitive Abilities Are Lower for Higher Ability Groups. , 1996 .
[36] A. Roelofs,et al. A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking , 1992, Cognition.
[37] W. Levelt,et al. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .
[38] R. Engle,et al. Is working memory capacity task dependent , 1989 .
[39] H. H. Clark,et al. Understanding old words with new meanings , 1983 .
[40] Myrna F Schwartz,et al. The word order problem in agrammatism II. Production , 1980, Brain and Language.
[41] J. G. Snodgrass,et al. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.
[42] R. Ratcliff. Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.
[43] Thomas S. Redick,et al. Lapses in sustained attention and their relation to executive control and fluid abilities: An individual differences investigation , 2010 .
[44] Mary H. MacLean,et al. Executive control processes of working memory predict attentional blink magnitude over and above storage capacity , 2010, Psychological research.
[45] Alfonso Caramazza,et al. Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[46] M. D’Esposito. Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.
[47] Randall W. Engle,et al. Simple and complex memory spans and their relation to fluid abilities: Evidence from list-length effects , 2006 .
[48] R. Engle,et al. Working memory capacity and fluid abilities: Examining the correlation between Operation Span and Raven , 2005 .
[49] A. Roelofs,et al. Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. , 2003, Psychological review.
[50] Antje S. Meyer,et al. Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion , 2003 .
[51] E. Miller,et al. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.
[52] B. Rapp,et al. Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. , 2000, Psychological review.
[53] A. Caramazza. How many levels of processing are there in lexical access , 1997 .
[54] Ardi Roelofs,et al. A Case for Nondecomposition in Conceptually Driven Word Retrieval , 1997 .
[55] R. H. Baayen,et al. The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .
[56] M. Posner,et al. The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.
[57] R. Duncan Luce,et al. Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .
[58] D. Norman,et al. Attention to action: Willed and automatic control , 1980 .
[59] G. Bower. Cognitive psychology: An introduction , 1975 .
[60] Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.