Behavioral and Brain Functions Dissociating Object Familiarity from Linguistic Properties in Mirror Word Reading

BackgroundIt is known that the orthographic properties of linguistic stimuli are processed within the left occipitotemporal cortex at about 150–200 ms. We recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) to words in standard or mirror orientation to investigate the role of visual word form in reading. Word inversion was performed to determine whether rotated words lose their linguistic properties.MethodsAbout 1300 Italian words and legal pseudo-words were presented to 18 right-handed Italian students engaged in a letter detection task. EEG was recorded from 128 scalp sites.ResultsERPs showed an early effect of word orientation at ~150 ms, with larger N1 amplitudes to rotated than to standard words. Low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) revealed an increase in N1 to rotated words primarily in the right occipital lobe (BA 18), which may indicate an effect of stimulus familiarity. N1 was greater to target than to non-target letters at left lateral occipital sites, thus reflecting the first stage of orthographic processing. LORETA revealed a strong focus of activation for this effect in the left fusiform gyrus (BA 37), which is consistent with the so-called visual word form area (VWFA). Standard words (compared to pseudowords) elicited an enhancement of left occipito/temporal negativity at about 250–350 ms, followed by a larger anterior P3, a reduced frontal N400 and a huge late positivity. Lexical effects for rotated strings were delayed by about 100 ms at occipito/temporal sites, and were totally absent at later processing stages. This suggests the presence of implicit reading processes, which were pre-attentive and of perceptual nature for mirror strings.ConclusionThe contrast between inverted and standard words did not lead to the identification of a purely linguistic brain region. This finding suggests some caveats in the interpretation of the inversion effect in subtractive paradigms.

[1]  Joseph T Devlin,et al.  The pro and cons of labelling a left occipitotemporal region: “the visual word form area” , 2004, NeuroImage.

[2]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The effect of face inversion on the human fusiform face area , 1998, Cognition.

[3]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  Are preschoolers sensitive to configural information in faces? , 2006, Developmental science.

[4]  G. Rousselet,et al.  Is it an animal? Is it a human face? Fast processing in upright and inverted natural scenes. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[5]  Daniel Brandeis,et al.  Emerging Neurophysiological Specialization for Letter Strings , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  A. Proverbio,et al.  Gender differences in hemispheric asymmetry for face processing , 2006, BMC Neuroscience.

[7]  M Honda,et al.  Essential role of the right superior parietal cortex in Japanese kana mirror reading: An fMRI study. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  P. Bennett,et al.  Inversion Leads to Quantitative, Not Qualitative, Changes in Face Processing , 2004, Current Biology.

[11]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area , 2004, NeuroImage.

[12]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The Effect of Face Inversion on Activity in Human Neural Systems for Face and Object Perception , 1999, Neuron.

[13]  T. Allison,et al.  Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe , 1994, Nature.

[14]  J. Grainger,et al.  An Electrophysiological Study of the Effects of Orthographic Neighborhood Size on Printed Word Perception , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  Cortical correlates of face and scene inversion: A comparison , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Too Many Trees to See the Forest: Performance, Event-related Potential, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Manifestations of Integrative Congenital Prosopagnosia , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Alice Mado Proverbio,et al.  From Orthography to Phonetics: ERP Measures of Grapheme-to-Phoneme Conversion Mechanisms in Reading , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  B. Renault,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of facial decision: insights from upright and upside-down Mooney-face perception. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[19]  S. Kuriki,et al.  Neural processing of words in the human extrastriate visual cortex. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[20]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[21]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  Fast, visual specialization for reading in English revealed by the topography of the N170 ERP response , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[22]  Alex Martin,et al.  Experience-dependent modulation of category-related cortical activity. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  A. Mechelli,et al.  Neuroimaging Studies of Word and Pseudoword Reading: Consistencies, Inconsistencies, and Limitations , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  M. Farah,et al.  Neural Specialization for Letter Recognition , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  [Q:] When Would You Prefer a SOSSAGE to a SAUSAGE? [A:] At about 100 msec. ERP Correlates of Orthographic Typicality and Lexicality in Written Word Recognition , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  The functionally defined right occipital and fusiform “face areas” discriminate novel from visually familiar faces , 2003, NeuroImage.

[28]  P. Bandettini,et al.  Understanding neural system dynamics through task modulation and measurement of functional MRI amplitude, latency, and width , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Marzia Del Zotto,et al.  Greek language processing in naive and skilled readers: Functional properties of the VWFA investigated with ERPs , 2006, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[30]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Dynamics of letter string perception in the human occipitotemporal cortex. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[31]  M. Riesenhuber,et al.  Face processing in humans is compatible with a simple shape–based model of vision , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs , 2004, NeuroImage.

[33]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Dissociation of normal feature analysis and deficient processing of letter-strings in dyslexic adults. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  R Salmelin,et al.  Neurophysiology of fluent and impaired reading: a magnetoencephalographic approach. , 2000, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[35]  J. Pernier,et al.  ERP Manifestations of Processing Printed Words at Different Psycholinguistic Levels: Time Course and Scalp Distribution , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  M. Kutas,et al.  Neurophysiological evidence for visual perceptual categorization of words and faces within 150 ms. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[37]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Face perception: domain specific, not process specific. , 2004, Neuron.

[38]  K. Uutela,et al.  Impaired visual word processing in dyslexia revealed with magnetoencephalography , 1996, Annals of neurology.

[39]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Early electrophysiological responses to multiple face orientations correlate with individual discrimination performance in humans , 2007, NeuroImage.

[40]  Lee Ryan,et al.  Regional specificity of format-specific priming effects in mirror word reading using functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Source analysis of the N170 to faces and objects , 2004, Neuroreport.

[42]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Stimulus inversion and the responses of face and object-sensitive cortical areas. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[43]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  V. Goffaux,et al.  Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: an event-related potentials study , 1999, Biological Psychology.

[45]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. , 1994, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[46]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[47]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  Mario Braun,et al.  Model-generated lexical activity predicts graded ERP amplitudes in lexical decision , 2006, Brain Research.

[49]  Guinevere F. Eden,et al.  Attention to single letters activates left extrastriate cortex , 2004, NeuroImage.

[50]  M J Farah,et al.  Second-order relational properties and the inversion effect: Testing a theory of face perception , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  Martin Kronbichler,et al.  The visual word form area and the frequency with which words are encountered: evidence from a parametric fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[52]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Neuromagnetic evidence for early access to cognitive representations , 2001, Neuroreport.

[53]  Gabriel Curio,et al.  MEG/EEG sources of the 170-ms response to faces are co-localized in the fusiform gyrus , 2007, NeuroImage.

[54]  R. Yin.  Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[55]  B. de Gelder,et al.  Configural face processes in acquired and developmental prosopagnosia: evidence for two separate face systems? , 2000, Neuroreport.

[56]  H. Begleiter,et al.  Visual object priming differs from visual word priming: an ERP study. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[57]  J. Desmond,et al.  The neural basis of visual skill learning: an fMRI study of mirror reading. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[58]  T. Allison,et al.  Differential Sensitivity of Human Visual Cortex to Faces, Letterstrings, and Textures: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[59]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986 .

[60]  S. Petersen,et al.  Activation of extrastriate and frontal cortical areas by visual words and word-like stimuli. , 1990, Science.

[61]  Guillaume Thierry,et al.  Perceptual and lexical effects in letter identification: An event-related potential study of the word superiority effect , 2006, Brain Research.

[62]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.