Protein Structure Validation and Refinement Using Amide Proton Chemical Shifts Derived from Quantum Mechanics

We present the ProCS method for the rapid and accurate prediction of protein backbone amide proton chemical shifts - sensitive probes of the geometry of key hydrogen bonds that determine protein structure. ProCS is parameterized against quantum mechanical (QM) calculations and reproduces high level QM results obtained for a small protein with an RMSD of 0.25 ppm (r = 0.94). ProCS is interfaced with the PHAISTOS protein simulation program and is used to infer statistical protein ensembles that reflect experimentally measured amide proton chemical shift values. Such chemical shift-based structural refinements, starting from high-resolution X-ray structures of Protein G, ubiquitin, and SMN Tudor Domain, result in average chemical shifts, hydrogen bond geometries, and trans-hydrogen bond (h3 JNC') spin-spin coupling constants that are in excellent agreement with experiment. We show that the structural sensitivity of the QM-based amide proton chemical shift predictions is needed to obtain this agreement. The ProCS method thus offers a powerful new tool for refining the structures of hydrogen bonding networks to high accuracy with many potential applications such as protein flexibility in ligand binding.

[1]  Jan H. Jensen,et al.  Very fast empirical prediction and rationalization of protein pKa values , 2005, Proteins.

[2]  D. Wishart,et al.  Rapid and accurate calculation of protein 1H, 13C and 15N chemical shifts , 2003, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[3]  David S Wishart,et al.  RefDB: A database of uniformly referenced protein chemical shifts , 2003, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[4]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Quantum-mechanics-derived 13Cα chemical shift server (CheShift) for protein structure validation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  M. Barfield,et al.  Structural dependencies of interresidue scalar coupling (h3)J(NC') and donor (1)H chemical shifts in the hydrogen bonding regions of proteins. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[6]  Jan H. Jensen,et al.  Cooperative hydrogen bonding effects are key determinants of backbone amide proton chemical shifts in proteins. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[7]  Oliver F. Lange,et al.  Recognition Dynamics Up to Microseconds Revealed from an RDC-Derived Ubiquitin Ensemble in Solution , 2008, Science.

[8]  X. Salvatella,et al.  The MUMO (minimal under-restraining minimal over-restraining) method for the determination of native state ensembles of proteins , 2007, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[9]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  Correlation between 3hJNC‘ and Hydrogen Bond Length in Proteins , 1999 .

[10]  N. Chirgadze,et al.  Crystal structure of human parathyroid hormone 1-34 at 0.9-A resolution. , 2000, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[11]  D. Case,et al.  Use of chemical shifts in macromolecular structure determination. , 2002, Methods in enzymology.

[12]  J H Prestegard,et al.  Order matrix analysis of residual dipolar couplings using singular value decomposition. , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[13]  A. Bax,et al.  SPARTA+: a modest improvement in empirical NMR chemical shift prediction by means of an artificial neural network , 2010, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[14]  Gerhard Klebe,et al.  PDB2PQR: expanding and upgrading automated preparation of biomolecular structures for molecular simulations , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[15]  N. C. Price,et al.  Synthesis, Structural and Biological Studies of Ubiquitin Mutants Containing (2S, 4S)‐5‐Fluoroleucine Residues Strategically Placed in the Hydrophobic Core , 2003, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[16]  J. Pople,et al.  Molecular orbital theory of aromatic ring currents , 1958 .

[17]  A. Bax,et al.  Protein backbone chemical shifts predicted from searching a database for torsion angle and sequence homology , 2007, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[18]  W. C. Still,et al.  The GB/SA Continuum Model for Solvation. A Fast Analytical Method for the Calculation of Approximate Born Radii , 1997 .

[19]  G. Scuseria,et al.  Gaussian 03, Revision E.01. , 2007 .

[20]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics calculations , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[21]  R. Friesner,et al.  Evaluation and Reparametrization of the OPLS-AA Force Field for Proteins via Comparison with Accurate Quantum Chemical Calculations on Peptides† , 2001 .

[22]  P. Markwick,et al.  Dynamic effects on j-couplings across hydrogen bonds in proteins. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[23]  A. Bax.  Weak alignment offers new NMR opportunities to study protein structure and dynamics , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[24]  D. Case,et al.  Automated prediction of 15N, 13Cα, 13Cβ and 13C′ chemical shifts in proteins using a density functional database , 2001, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[25]  Sandro Bottaro,et al.  Potentials of Mean Force for Protein Structure Prediction Vindicated, Formalized and Generalized , 2010, PloS one.

[26]  Jan H. Jensen,et al.  Definitive Benchmark Study of Ring Current Effects on Amide Proton Chemical Shifts. , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[27]  Kai J. Kohlhoff,et al.  Fast and accurate predictions of protein NMR chemical shifts from interatomic distances. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[28]  Ad Bax,et al.  Validation of Protein Structure from Anisotropic Carbonyl Chemical Shifts in a Dilute Liquid Crystalline Phase , 1998 .

[29]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[30]  Frans A A Mulder,et al.  NMR chemical shift data and ab initio shielding calculations: emerging tools for protein structure determination. , 2010, Chemical Society reviews.

[31]  Michael Nilges,et al.  Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S6 References Movies S1 to S5 Inferential Structure Determination , 2022 .

[32]  C. Bugg,et al.  Structure of ubiquitin refined at 1.8 A resolution. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  Wouter Boomsma,et al.  Subtle Monte Carlo Updates in Dense Molecular Systems. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[34]  M. DePristo,et al.  Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics , 2005, Nature.

[35]  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen,et al.  PHAISTOS: A framework for Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation and inference of protein structure , 2013, J. Comput. Chem..

[36]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of protein structures by quantum mechanical computations of 13C(alpha) chemical shifts. , 2009, Accounts of chemical research.

[37]  D. Case.  Chemical shifts in biomolecules. , 2013, Current opinion in structural biology.

[38]  Rupal Jain,et al.  Calculating accurate proton chemical shifts of organic molecules with density functional methods and modest basis sets. , 2009, The Journal of organic chemistry.

[39]  J. Meiler.  PROSHIFT: Protein chemical shift prediction using artificial neural networks , 2003, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[40]  A. Császár,et al.  On NMR isotropic chemical shift surfaces of peptide models , 2004 .

[41]  X. Salvatella,et al.  Weak Long-Range Correlated Motions in a Surface Patch of Ubiquitin Involved in Molecular Recognition , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[42]  D. Wishart,et al.  Rapid and accurate calculation of protein 1H, 13C and 15N chemical shifts , 2003, Journal of Biomolecular NMR.

[43]  T. Muir,et al.  Synthetic, structural and biological studies of the ubiquitin system: the total chemical synthesis of ubiquitin. , 1994, The Biochemical journal.

[44]  Miron Livny,et al.  BioMagResBank , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[45]  S. Grzesiek,et al.  Direct Observation of Hydrogen Bonds in Proteins by Interresidue 3hJNC' Scalar Couplings , 1999 .

[46]  Shoshannah A. Pearlman,et al.  A Comparison Of Density Functional Methods For The Estimation Of Proton Chemical Shifts With Chemical Accuracy , 1999 .

[47]  J. Pople,et al.  Proton Magnetic Resonance of Hydrocarbons , 1956 .

[48]  D. Case,et al.  A new model for chemical shifts of amide hydrogens in proteins , 2007, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[49]  Jun Hyoung Lee,et al.  Phenotypic engineering by reprogramming gene transcription using novel artificial transcription factors in Escherichia coli , 2008, Nucleic acids research.