Experimental Investigation of Geopolymers for Application in High-Temperature and Geothermal Well Cementing

With recurrent calls for a reduction in carbon emissions, geothermal energy has received increasing attention in recent years as a prominent source of clean energy. With current drilling technology, geothermal wells are being constructed in extremely challenging temperature environments, which could reach up to 600°F/315°C in-situ temperature and beyond. However, geothermal well-cementing technology has not changed much over the past few decades, with Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) still being the primary choice of cementing material. OPC has several drawbacks such as brittle behavior, shrinkage upon setting, poor bond strength to formation and casing, susceptibility to acid gas attack, temperature-induced strength retrogression, low tolerance towards drilling fluid contamination, etc. These factors could lead to a poor cementing job, thus compromising well integrity and not ensuring proper zonal isolation for the life of the geothermal well. Thus, there is a need to develop an alternative material that is compatible with the geothermal environment and able to provide long-term zonal isolation. With a low carbon footprint, self-healing ability, and low shrinkage sensitivity, geopolymers or alkali-activated materials could be a suitable option to augment or even replace OPC. Some of the previous studies on geopolymers have shown that they could be a potential candidate for oil and gas well cementing and civil engineering applications, with some being stable at very high temperatures (up to 1470°F/800°C). Geopolymers are formed by mixing an aluminosilicate source such as fly ash with an alkali-activating solution, such as sodium or potassium hydroxide or silicate. The aim of the study reported here is to demonstrate the applicability of geopolymers for geothermal well cementing. An experimental investigation was carried out to understand the behavior of geopolymer formulations made from fly ash, metakaolin, and blast furnace slag in a high-temperature environment. The material properties such as porosity, viscosity, thickening/pump time, compressive strength, tensile strength, and bond strength were tested in the laboratory. It was found that geopolymer formulations can be formulated to have the desired rheological properties with adequate pump time and resistance to drilling fluid contamination. In addition, the formulations can exceed the required compressive and tensile strength for geothermal cementing operations, while obtaining excellent bond strength values. These findings indicate that geopolymers are cementing materials that are well-suited to provide long-term zonal isolation in high-temperature geothermal wells.

[1]  M. Juenger,et al.  Fly Ash-Based Geopolymers as Lower Carbon Footprint Alternatives to Portland Cement for Well Cementing Applications , 2022, Energies.

[2]  S. Miska,et al.  Cement Sheath Fatigue Failure Prediction by Support Vector Machine Based Model , 2022, Day 2 Wed, October 19, 2022.

[3]  M. Juenger,et al.  Permeability Recovery by Self-Healing of Class F Fly Ash-Based Geopolymers , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[4]  S. Miska,et al.  The Influence of Formation Creeping on Wellbore Integrity , 2021, Day 1 Fri, November 26, 2021.

[5]  G. K. Wong,et al.  A New Fundamental Understanding of Gas in the Drilling Riser , 2021, Day 4 Thu, August 19, 2021.

[6]  D. Gao,et al.  A Parametric Study for Radial Cracking in Cement Under Different Loading Events Based on the Stress Intensity Factor , 2021, Journal of Energy Resources Technology.

[7]  A. Saasen,et al.  Alternative setting materials for primary cementing and zonal isolation – Laboratory evaluation of rheological and mechanical properties , 2021 .

[8]  E. Oort,et al.  Globally scalable geothermal energy production through managed pressure operation control of deep closed-loop well systems , 2021 .

[9]  S. Salehi,et al.  Impact of Drilling Fluid Contamination on Performance of Rock-Based Geopolymers , 2021, SPE Journal.

[10]  E. Oort,et al.  Constructing Deep Closed-Loop Geothermal Wells for Globally Scalable Energy Production by Leveraging Oil and Gas ERD and HPHT Well Construction Expertise , 2021 .

[11]  G. K. Wong,et al.  Pressure-Difference Method for Gas-Kick Detection in Risers , 2021 .

[12]  Payam Allahvirdizadeh A review on geothermal wells: Well integrity issues , 2020 .

[13]  Benjamin M. Adams,et al.  Advanced drilling technologies to improve the economics of deep geo-resource utilization , 2020 .

[14]  A. Al-Tabbaa,et al.  Development and Application of Novel Sodium Silicate Microcapsule-Based Self-Healing Oil Well Cement , 2020, Materials.

[15]  M. Juenger,et al.  Silicate-Activated Geopolymer Alternatives to Portland Cement for Thermal Well Integrity , 2019 .

[16]  Mohamed Ahdaya,et al.  Fly ash Class C based geopolymer for oil well cementing , 2019, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.

[17]  M. Juenger,et al.  Long-term Oil Well Zonal Isolation Control Using Geopolymers: An Analysis of Shrinkage Behavior , 2019, Day 3 Thu, March 07, 2019.

[18]  M. Mahmoud,et al.  Nanoclay Content Influence on Cement Strength for Oil Wells Subjected to Cyclic Steam Injection and High-Temperature Conditions , 2018, Day 1 Mon, November 12, 2018.

[19]  Sun Baojiang,et al.  Utilization of alkali-activated slag based composite in deepwater oil well cementing , 2018, Construction and Building Materials.

[20]  Antonio Eduardo Martinelli,et al.  A geopolymer cementing system for oil wells subject to steam injection , 2018, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.

[21]  Arild Saasen,et al.  Bond Strength Between Different Casing Materials and Cement , 2018 .

[22]  J. Gillies,et al.  Unlocking the Economic Potential of a Mature Field Through Rigless Remediation of Microchannels in a Cement Packer Using Epoxy Resin and Ultrafine Cement Technology to Access New Oil Reserves , 2018 .

[23]  M. Juenger,et al.  Extending supplementary cementitious material resources: Reclaimed and remediated fly ash and natural pozzolans , 2017, Cement and Concrete Composites.

[24]  S. Nair,et al.  True Self-Healing Geopolymer Cements for Improved Zonal Isolation and Well Abandonment , 2017 .

[25]  Chen-hui Huang,et al.  Properties of oil well cement with high dosage of metakaolin , 2016 .

[26]  S. Nair,et al.  Contamination of deepwater well cementations by synthetic-based drilling fluids , 2014 .

[27]  Alice Chougnet-Sirapian,et al.  Expanding Cement For Improved Wellbore Sealing: Prestress Development, Physical Properties, And Logging Response , 2014 .

[28]  S. L. Roy-Delage,et al.  Autogenous shrinkage of hardening cement paste in oil wells , 2013 .

[29]  T. Sugama,et al.  Thermal Shock-resistant Cement , 2012 .

[30]  J. Ideker,et al.  Advances in alternative cementitious binders , 2011 .

[31]  G. Corder,et al.  Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary portland cement , 2011 .

[32]  Erich D. Rodríguez,et al.  Mechanical and thermal characterisation of geopolymers based on silicate-activated metakaolin/slag blends , 2011, Journal of Materials Science.

[33]  J. Deventer,et al.  The Role of Inorganic Polymer Technology in the Development of ‘Green Concrete’ , 2007 .

[34]  Fatemeh K. Saleh,et al.  Study and Use of Geopolymer Mixtures for Oil and Gas Well Cementing Applications , 2018 .

[35]  Amanda M. M. Bustin,et al.  Impact of Shale Properties on Pore Structure and Storage Characteristics , 2008 .

[36]  C. R. Miranda,et al.  Minimizing Fluid Contamination During Oilwell Cementing Operations , 2007 .

[37]  T. Sugama,et al.  Ceramic fibre-reinforced calcium aluminate/flyash/polyphosphate cements at a hydrothermal temperature of 280°C , 2002 .

[38]  J. J. Nahm,et al.  Universal Fluid: A Drilling Fluid To Reduce Lost Circulation and Improve Cementing , 1994 .

[39]  S. Miska,et al.  The Influence of Elliptical-geometry Wellbore on Zonal Isolation , 2022, Proceedings 56th US Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium.