Intensity image quality assessment based on multiscale gradient magnitude similarity deviation

Abstract. Laser active imaging is widely used in many fields. The intensity image quality of laser active imaging is affected by various degradations, such as speckle effect and noise. Most existing objective image quality assessment (IQA) methods that consider only a single distorted image are not suitable for an intensity image. A multiscale full-reference intensity IQA method is presented. The proposed method is based on an improved gradient magnitude similarity deviation (GMSD) in the nonsubsampled contourlet transform (NSCT) domain. The reference and distorted images are decomposed by NSCT to emulate the multichannel structure of the human visual system. Then, the GMSD of each sub-band is computed to capture the intensity image quality. At last, the contrast sensitivity function implementation is employed in the sub-bands of the NSCT domain. All sub-bands’ GMSD is evaluated and pooled together to yield the objective quality index of a distorted intensity image. Experimental results show that the proposed method can effectively and accurately evaluate the quality of intensity images, and it is highly consistent with subjective perception.

[1]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003, The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003.

[2]  D. Chandler Seven Challenges in Image Quality Assessment: Past, Present, and Future Research , 2013 .

[3]  Miaomiao Yu,et al.  Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment by Combining Features in Spatial and Frequency Domains , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[4]  Weisi Lin,et al.  A ParaBoost Method to Image Quality Assessment , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[5]  Qunfei Zhao,et al.  Nonsubsampled contourlet transform-based algorithm for no-reference image quality assessment , 2011 .

[6]  Yeli Li,et al.  Image Quality Assessment by Considering Multiscale and Multidirectional Visibility Differences in Shearlet Domain , 2019, IEEE Access.

[7]  Huimin Xie,et al.  Mean intensity gradient: An effective global parameter for quality assessment of the speckle patterns used in digital image correlation , 2010 .

[8]  Dong-O Kim,et al.  Gradient information-based image quality metric , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics.

[9]  Weisi Lin,et al.  Image Quality Assessment Based on Gradient Similarity , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  Sebastian Bosse,et al.  Deep Neural Networks for No-Reference and Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[11]  Xuelong Li,et al.  Image Quality Assessment Based on Multiscale Geometric Analysis , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  Ove Steinvall Review of laser sensing devices and systems , 2005, SPIE Security + Defence.

[13]  王灿进 Wang Canjin,et al.  Image deblurring for laser active illumination based on light vein features , 2016 .

[14]  Xiaofeng Li,et al.  Intensity image denoising for laser active imaging system using nonsubsampled contourlet transform and SURE approach , 2012 .

[15]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Complex Wavelet Structural Similarity: A New Image Similarity Index , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[16]  Kefei Lu,et al.  Quality assessment of laser speckle patterns for digital image correlation by a Multi-Factor Fusion Index , 2020 .

[17]  Bülent Sankur,et al.  Statistical evaluation of image quality measures , 2002, J. Electronic Imaging.

[18]  Minh N. Do,et al.  The Nonsubsampled Contourlet Transform: Theory, Design, and Applications , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[19]  Baojun Zhao,et al.  NMF-Based Image Quality Assessment Using Extreme Learning Machine , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[20]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Information Content Weighting for Perceptual Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[21]  Weisi Lin,et al.  Perceptual visual quality metrics: A survey , 2011, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[22]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  No-Reference Image Quality Assessment in the Spatial Domain , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[23]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  The Laplacian Pyramid as a Compact Image Code , 1983, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[24]  Deshi Li,et al.  RVSIM: a feature similarity method for full-reference image quality assessment , 2018, EURASIP J. Image Video Process..

[25]  Lai-Man Po,et al.  No-reference image quality assessment with shearlet transform and deep neural networks , 2015, Neurocomputing.

[26]  Yang Zhao,et al.  Image quality assessment based on multi-feature extraction and synthesis with support vector regression , 2017, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[27]  Sebastian Bosse,et al.  A Haar wavelet-based perceptual similarity index for image quality assessment , 2016, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[28]  Robert A. Brown,et al.  Powered low cost autonomous attack system: a network-centric munition concept demonstration , 2006, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[29]  J. Goodman Speckle Phenomena in Optics: Theory and Applications , 2020 .

[30]  Hua Huang,et al.  No-reference image quality assessment in curvelet domain , 2014, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[31]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[32]  David J. Sakrison,et al.  The effects of a visual fidelity criterion of the encoding of images , 1974, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[33]  Gwanggil Jeon,et al.  Image Quality Assessment with Saliency Map in Nonsubsampled Contourlet Transform Domain , 2016, MUE 2016.

[34]  Hua Huang,et al.  Image Quality Assessment Using Directional Anisotropy Structure Measurement , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[35]  Syed Muhammad Anwar,et al.  Blind image quality assessment using natural scene statistics of stationary wavelet transform , 2020 .

[36]  P. Andersson Long-range three-dimensional imaging using range-gated laser radar images , 2006 .

[37]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[38]  Xin Yang,et al.  Image quality assessment using contourlet transform , 2009 .

[39]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Why is image quality assessment so difficult? , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[40]  Xuelong Li,et al.  Blind Image Quality Assessment via Deep Learning , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[41]  Wenzhong Guo,et al.  2D and 3D Image Quality Assessment: A Survey of Metrics and Challenges , 2019, IEEE Access.

[42]  Gustavo de Veciana,et al.  An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[43]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Index , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[44]  Paolo Napoletano,et al.  On the use of deep learning for blind image quality assessment , 2016, Signal Image Video Process..

[45]  David Zhang,et al.  FSIM: A Feature Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[46]  Azadeh Mansouri,et al.  SSVD: Structural SVD-based image quality assessment , 2019, Signal Process. Image Commun..