ESTIMATING THE IMPACT OF A DIFFUSE TECHNOLOGY ON THE RUNNING COSTS OF A HOSPITAL

Objectives: This paper considers the methodological problems that arise in conducting cost analyses in economic evaluations where only observational (rather than experimental) data are available and where the technology being evaluated is diffuse, such that the unit of analysis has to be the institution rather than the patient. Methods: A case study is reported that concerns the application of computer technology in radiology: picture archiving and communication systems (PACS). A range of different approaches were used to estimate changes in running costs, including time series analyses of routine data and direct observation of resource use.Results:The analysis illustrates some of the difficulties involved in costing the introduction of a diffuse technology. Nevertheless, it provides a firm indication that, overall, the introduction of PACS was found to be associated with a significant increase in hospital costs, suggesting that the initial expectations of financial savings were unduly optimistic. Conclusions: The research demonstrates that, using multiple methods, it is possible to estimate cost changes within a single hospital. In addition, the paper discusses the nature of the uncertainties in such analyses and possible ways of representing such uncertainty in terms of confidence intervals.

[1]  G Weatherburn,et al.  Evaluation of diffuse technologies: the case of digital imaging networks. , 1995, Health policy.

[2]  S G Thompson,et al.  Analysis and interpretation of cost data in randomised controlled trials: review of published studies , 1998, BMJ.

[3]  M. Buxton,et al.  The benefits of hospital-wide picture archiving and communication systems: a survey of clinical users of radiology services. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.

[4]  J. Watkins,et al.  A hospital-wide picture archiving and communication system (PACS): the views of users and providers of the radiology service at Hammersmith Hospital. , 1999, European journal of radiology.

[5]  A Briggs,et al.  The Distribution of Health Care Costs and Their Statistical Analysis for Economic Evaluation , 1998, Journal of health services research & policy.

[6]  P Fenn,et al.  The Analysis of Censored Treatment Cost Data in Economic Evaluation , 1995, Medical care.

[7]  G Weatherburn,et al.  Issues in the evaluation of picture archiving and communication systems. , 1995, Health policy.

[8]  E. Feuer,et al.  Estimating medical costs from incomplete follow-up data. , 1997, Biometrics.

[9]  G C Weatherburn,et al.  The effect of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) on patient radiation doses for examination of the lateral lumbar spine. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.

[10]  M J Buxton,et al.  Radiology report times: impact of picture archiving and communication systems. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  L J van Erning,et al.  Overview of CAPACITY data. , 1992, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[12]  H L Kundel,et al.  Incremental cost of department-wide implementation of a picture archiving and communication system and computed radiography. , 1998, Radiology.

[13]  S Bryan,et al.  Extrapolation of Cost-Effectiveness Information to Local Settings , 1998, Journal of health services research & policy.

[14]  G C Weatherburn,et al.  The effect of PACS on the visualization of the lateral cervical spine and the management of patients presenting with trauma. , 1997, Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique.

[15]  G Weatherburn,et al.  Evaluation of a Hospital Picture Archiving and Communication System , 1999, Journal of health services research & policy.

[16]  G Weatherburn,et al.  The effect of a Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS) on diagnostic performance in the accident and emergency department , 2000, Journal of accident & emergency medicine.