Measuring performance of the Malaysian construction industry

A systematic measurement framework for the Malaysian construction industry is essential to enable the industry to monitor its progress towards achieving the goals set out in the Construction Industry Master Plan 2006–15. The objectives were to develop a comprehensive set of performance measures for the construction industry, to compute these measures for the 2006 base year and to benchmark the available data. The Balanced Scorecard approach was used to examine the links between the critical success factors and strategic thrusts defined in the master plan to ensure that these provide a balanced view of the industry’s competitive standing. The resulting strategy map revealed that the eight critical success factors and seven strategic thrusts of the master plan generally cover all four Balanced Scorecard perspectives with a strong emphasis on learning and growth. Thirty‐four performance measures were adapted from other initiatives, modified to suit local practices, or were created specifically to measure the outcomes of the strategic thrusts. Performance measures were computed for the 2006 base year. A comparative analysis of the available data was conducted to determine tentative targets for these measures.

[1]  Sai S. Nudurupati,et al.  Performance measurement in the construction industry: An action case investigating manufacturing methodologies , 2007, Comput. Ind..

[2]  Sangyoon Chin,et al.  Comparable Performance Measurement System for Construction Companies , 2007 .

[3]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[4]  Qiping Shen,et al.  Measuring the performance of value management studies in construction : critical review , 2007 .

[5]  Paul R. Niven,et al.  Balanced Scorecard Step-by-Step: Maximizing Performance and Maintaining Results , 2002 .

[6]  Francis D. Tuggle,et al.  Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes , 2004 .

[7]  Aminah Robinson Fayek,et al.  Initial metrics and pilot program results for measuring the performance of the Canadian construction industry , 2008 .

[8]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes , 2003 .

[9]  Keijiro Tamenaga,et al.  International Patent Classification , 1980 .

[10]  Andrew D.F. Price,et al.  Performance Measurement in Construction , 2004 .

[11]  T. Thorpe,et al.  KPIs: a critical appraisal of their use in construction , 2004 .

[12]  Carl-Henric Nilsson,et al.  Do quality systems really make a difference? , 2001 .

[13]  Sherif Ali Mohtady Mohamed,et al.  Scorecard Approach to Benchmarking Organizational Safety Culture in Construction , 2003 .

[14]  Ghassan Aouad,et al.  Performance management in construction: a conceptual framework , 2001 .

[15]  Paul Dewick,et al.  Innovation in construction: A European analysis , 2004 .

[16]  A. Akintoye,et al.  PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS IN CONSTRUCTION , 2005 .

[17]  Malaysia,et al.  Ninth Malaysia plan, 2006-2010 , 2006 .

[18]  C. Caldas,et al.  Benchmarking Initiatives in the Construction Industry: Lessons Learned and Improvement Opportunities , 2006 .

[19]  H. Volger WIPO – World Intellectual Property Organization , 2010 .

[20]  Stefano Tonchia,et al.  Performance Measurement Systems , 2010 .