Left ventricular volume measurement in mice by conductance catheter: evaluation and optimization of calibration.

The conductance catheter (CC) allows thorough evaluation of cardiac function because it simultaneously provides measurements of pressure and volume. Calibration of the volume signal remains challenging. With different calibration techniques, in vivo left ventricular volumes (V(CC)) were measured in mice (n = 52) with a Millar CC (SPR-839) and compared with MRI-derived volumes (V(MRI)). Significant correlations between V(CC) and V(MRI) [end-diastolic volume (EDV): R(2) = 0.85, P < 0.01; end-systolic volume (ESV): R(2) = 0.88, P < 0.01] were found when injection of hypertonic saline in the pulmonary artery was used to calibrate for parallel conductance and volume conversion was done by individual cylinder calibration. However, a significant underestimation was observed [EDV = -17.3 microl (-22.7 to -11.9 microl); ESV = -8.8 microl (-12.5 to -5.1 microl)]. Intravenous injection of the hypertonic saline bolus was inferior to injection into the pulmonary artery as a calibration method. Calibration with an independent measurement of stroke volume decreased the agreement with V(MRI). Correction for an increase in blood conductivity during the in vivo experiments improved estimation of EDV. The dual-frequency method for estimation of parallel conductance failed to produce V(CC) that correlated with V(MRI). We conclude that selection of the calibration procedure for the CC has significant implications for the accuracy and precision of volume estimation and pressure-volume loop-derived variables like myocardial contractility. Although V(CC) may be underestimated compared with MRI, optimized calibration techniques enable reliable volume estimation with the CC in mice.

[1]  Ronald R. Watson,et al.  Validation of Conductance Catheter System for Quantification of Murine Pressure-Volume Loops , 2001, Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research.

[2]  W J Manning,et al.  In vivo assessment of LV mass in mice using high-frequency cardiac ultrasound: necropsy validation. , 1994, The American journal of physiology.

[3]  Monique Bernard,et al.  Myocardial blood flow mapping in mice using high‐resolution spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging: Influence of ketamine/xylazine and isoflurane anesthesia , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  D. Kass,et al.  Estimation of parallel conductance by dual-frequency conductance catheter in mice. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[5]  Victor Mor-Avi,et al.  Improved quantification of left ventricular volumes and mass based on endocardial and epicardial surface detection from cardiac MR images using level set models. , 2005, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[6]  P. Steendijk,et al.  Comparison of intravenous and pulmonary artery injections of hypertonic saline for the assessment of conductance catheter parallel conductance. , 2000, Cardiovascular research.

[7]  J. Spinelli,et al.  Conductivity and geometrical factors affecting volume measurements with an impedancimetric catheter , 1986, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[8]  B Buis,et al.  Continuous measurement of left ventricular volume in animals and humans by conductance catheter. , 1984, Circulation.

[9]  T. Skalak,et al.  Accuracy of the conductance catheter for measurement of ventricular volumes seen clinically: effects of electric field homogeneity and parallel conductance , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  J. G. Webster,et al.  Impedance of Skeletal Muscle from 1 Hz to 1 MHz , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Stefan Neubauer,et al.  Magnetic resonance microimaging for noninvasive quantification of myocardial function and mass in the mouse , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[13]  Stefan Neubauer,et al.  How to perform an accurate assessment of cardiac function in mice using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. , 2006, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[14]  P. Doevendans,et al.  Left ventricular pressure–volume measurements in mice: Comparison of closed–chest versus open–chest approach , 2004, Basic Research in Cardiology.

[15]  Jonathan W. Valvano,et al.  Nonlinear conductance-volume relationship for murine conductance catheter measurement system , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  G L Freeman,et al.  Validation of a mouse conductance system to determine LV volume: comparison to echocardiography and crystals. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[17]  P. Steendijk,et al.  Dependence of anisotropic myocardial electrical resistivity on cardiac phase and excitation frequency , 1994, Basic Research in Cardiology.

[18]  C. H. Chen,et al.  Special Communication , 2004 .

[19]  E. Pitman A NOTE ON NORMAL CORRELATION , 1939 .

[20]  R. Watson,et al.  Age-related left ventricular function in the mouse: analysis based on in vivo pressure-volume relationships. , 1999, The American journal of physiology.

[21]  J A Pearce,et al.  Development of a multifrequency conductance catheter-based system to determine LV function in mice. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[22]  U. Flögel,et al.  Direct comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and conductance microcatheter in the evaluation of left ventricular function in mice , 2005, Basic Research in Cardiology.

[23]  T J Gawne,et al.  Estimating left ventricular offset volume using dual-frequency conductance catheters. , 1987, Journal of applied physiology.

[24]  H. P. Schwan,et al.  Electrical properties of blood and its constitutents: Alternating current spectroscopy , 1983, Blut: Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Blutforschung.