Phenotypic information in genomic variant databases enhances clinical care and research: The international standards for cytogenomic arrays consortium experience

Whole‐genome analysis, now including whole‐genome sequencing, is moving rapidly into the clinical setting, leading to detection of human variation on a broader scale than ever before. Interpreting this information will depend on the availability of thorough and accurate phenotype information, and the ability to curate, store, and access data on genotype–phenotype relationships. This idea has already been demonstrated within the context of chromosomal microarray (CMA) testing. The International Standards for Cytogenomic Arrays (ISCA) Consortium promotes standardization of variant interpretation for this technology through its initiatives, including the formation of a publicly available database housing clinical CMA data. Recognizing that phenotypic data are essential for the interpretation of genomic variants, the ISCA Consortium has developed tools to facilitate the collection of these data and its deposition in a standardized structured format within the ISCA Consortium database. This rich source of phenotypic data can also be used within broader applications such as developing phenotypic profiles of emerging genomic disorders, identification of candidate regions for particular phenotypes, or creation of tools for use in clinical practice. We summarize the ISCA experience as a model for ongoing efforts incorporating phenotype data with genotype data to improve the quality of research and clinical care in human genetics. Hum Mutat 33:787–796, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Variability in interpreting and reporting copy number changes detected by array-based technology in clinical laboratories , 2009, Genetics in Medicine.

[2]  Gregory M. Cooper,et al.  A Copy Number Variation Morbidity Map of Developmental Delay , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[3]  A. Ramalingam,et al.  16p13.11 duplication is a risk factor for a wide spectrum of neuropsychiatric disorders , 2011, Journal of Human Genetics.

[4]  H. Mefford,et al.  Recurrent reciprocal deletions and duplications of 16p13.11: the deletion is a risk factor for MR/MCA while the duplication may be a rare benign variant , 2008, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[5]  Manuel Corpas,et al.  DECIPHER: Database of Chromosomal Imbalance and Phenotype in Humans Using Ensembl Resources. , 2009, American journal of human genetics.

[6]  Rob W.W. Hooft,et al.  The value of data , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[7]  Caleb Webber,et al.  Accurate Distinction of Pathogenic from Benign CNVs in Mental Retardation , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[8]  K. Cornish,et al.  Cri du chat syndrome: genotype‐phenotype correlations and recommendations for clinical management , 2002, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[9]  H. Döhner,et al.  Matrix‐based comparative genomic hybridization: Biochips to screen for genomic imbalances , 1997, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[10]  S. South,et al.  American College of Medical Genetics recommendations for the design and performance expectations for clinical genomic copy number microarrays intended for use in the postnatal setting for detection of constitutional abnormalities , 2011, Genetics in Medicine.

[11]  Swaroop Aradhya,et al.  An evidence-based approach to establish the functional and clinical significance of copy number variants in intellectual and developmental disabilities , 2011, Genetics in Medicine.

[12]  P. Bork,et al.  Association of genes to genetically inherited diseases using data mining , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[13]  E. Thorland,et al.  Towards an evidence‐based process for the clinical interpretation of copy number variation , 2012, Clinical genetics.

[14]  L Hotić,et al.  [The cri-du-chat syndrome]. , 1986, Medicinski arhiv.

[15]  S. Mundlos,et al.  The Human Phenotype Ontology , 2010, Clinical genetics.

[16]  Mark Gerstein,et al.  Integration of curated databases to identify genotype-phenotype associations , 2006, BMC Genomics.

[17]  Fikret Erdogan,et al.  Array CGH identifies reciprocal 16p13.1 duplications and deletions that predispose to autism and/or mental retardation , 2007, Human mutation.

[18]  P. Robinson,et al.  The Human Phenotype Ontology: a tool for annotating and analyzing human hereditary disease. , 2008, American journal of human genetics.

[19]  Ulf Leser,et al.  Mining phenotypes for gene function prediction , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[20]  W. Kuo,et al.  High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[21]  John M. Hancock,et al.  Entity/quality-based logical definitions for the human skeletal phenome using PATO , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[22]  B. Littenberg,et al.  Passive consent for clinical research in the age of HIPAA , 2006, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[23]  R. Scarinci,et al.  [Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome]. , 1985, La Pediatria medica e chirurgica : Medical and surgical pediatrics.

[24]  Roger T. Anderson,et al.  Variations among Institutional Review Board reviews in a multisite health services research study. , 2005, Health services research.

[25]  Marcel H. Schulz,et al.  Clinical diagnostics in human genetics with semantic similarity searches in ontologies. , 2009, American journal of human genetics.

[26]  B. D. de Vries,et al.  European Cytogeneticists Association Register of Unbalanced Chromosome Aberrations (ECARUCA); an online database for rare chromosome abnormalities. , 2006, European journal of medical genetics.

[27]  L. Vissers,et al.  Clinical and molecular delineation of the 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome , 2008, Journal of Medical Genetics.